Quantcast
Channel: Pax on both houses
Viewing all 30150 articles
Browse latest View live

American Conservatives: Parasitizing Ebola

$
0
0

GOP Candidates' Scariest Ebola Warnings
New York Magazine
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/10/gop-politicians-scariest-ebola-warnings.html

***

"Republicans Want You Scared Of Ebola"
Newsweek
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/27/republicans-want-you-scared-of-ebola.html

***

"Ebola Represents A Trivial Threat To Americans' Health"

***

"Self-Terrorization Is The National Pastime"

***

"Any Religion That Needs Fear To Thrive Is Bad Religion"

"There is no fear in love. 
But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. 
The one who fears is not made perfect in love."
1 John 4:18 

***

"Terror And The Other Religions"

12% of Americans think a family member 
will be infected with Ebola in the next year.

Bill Maher: The Zombie Life Cycle Of Republican Lies. They Never - Ever - Die

"American Conservatives And Oppositional-Defiant Disorder"
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2013/09/arrested-development-american.html

"Conservatives Scare More Easily Than Liberals"

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal Criticizes The Stupid Party
"Simply protects the rich so they get to keep their toys"




The Hand Throuigh The Fence. What A Childhood Encounter Taught Neruda

$
0
0

The Hand Through the Fence: Pablo Neruda on What a Childhood Encounter Taught Him About Writing and Why We Make Art

Since our cave-dwelling days, the question of why we make art and why we enjoy it has haunted us as a perennial specter of the human experience. For Leo Tolstoy, it was about the transference of "emotional infectiousness"; for Jeanette Winterson, about "active surrender"; for Oscar Wilde, about cultivating a "temperament of receptivity."

That question is what beloved Chilean poet and Nobel laureate Pablo Neruda answers with unparalleled elegance in a short essay from the early 1950s titled "Childhood and Poetry,"found in the altogether enchanting collectionNeruda and Vallejo (public library).

Neruda relays an anecdote from his childhood that profoundly influenced not only his poetry but also his understanding of art and of life itself:
One time, investigating in the backyard of our house in Temuco the tiny objects and minuscule beings of my world, I came upon a hole in one of the boards of the fence. I looked through the hole and saw a landscape like that behind our house, uncared for, and wild. I moved back a few steps, because I sensed vaguely that something was about to happen. All of a sudden a hand appeared – a tiny hand of a boy about my own age. By the time I came close again, the hand was gone, and in its place there was a marvelous white sheep.
The sheep’s wool was faded. Its wheels had escaped. All of this only made it more authentic. I had never seen such a wonderful sheep. I looked back through the hole, but the boy had disappeared. I went into the house and brought out a treasure of my own: a pinecone, opened, full of odor and resin, which I adored. I set it down in the same spot and went off with the sheep.
He never saw the hand nor the boy it belonged to again. The lamb toy perished in a fire years later. But that boyhood encounter, with the simplicity of its symbolism, impressed upon him a lifelong learning – the second he grasped that faded-wool lamb he grasped a deep truth about the longing for mutuality that impels us to make art:
To feel the intimacy of brothers is a marvelous thing in life. To feel the love of people whom we love is a fire that feeds our life. But to feel the affection that comes from those whom we do not know, from those unknown to us, who are watching over our sleep and solitude, over our dangers and our weaknesses – that is something still greater and more beautiful because it widens out the boundaries of our being, and unites all living things.
That exchange brought home to me for the first time a precious idea: that all of humanity is somehow together...
It won’t surprise you then that I attempted to give something resiny, earthlike, and fragrant in exchange for human brotherhood. Just as I once left the pinecone by the fence, I have since left my words on the door of so many people who were unknown to me, people in prison, or hunted, or alone.
Also included in the volume is a 1966 interview by Bly under the title "The Lamb and the Pine Cone," in which Neruda revisits the formative incident and how it shaped his understanding of the creative experience:
This exchange of gifts – mysterious – settled deep inside me like a sedimentary deposit.
Neruda and Vallejo is a joy in its entirety. Complement it with Tom O'Bedlam's beautiful reading of Neruda's "Ode to the Book" and Robert Henri on how art binds us together.


William James On Choosing Purpose Over Profit

$
0
0
William James
Wikipedia

"The moral flabbiness born of the exclusive worship of the bitch-goddess Success. That - with the squalid cash interpretation put on the word "success" - is our national disease." 

***

William James on Choosing Purpose Over Profit and the Life-Changing Power of a Great Mentor

by 
“After all, the great problem of life seems to be how to keep body and soul together.”
William James is celebrated as one of the most influential philosophers of all time. His publication of The Principles of Psychology in 1890 established him as the father of American psychology. His 1901 treatise The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature, originally delivered at the prestigious Gifford Lectures, remains one of the most important theological works of all time and inspired Carl Sagan’s superb The Varieties of Scientific Experience. But if James were alive today, his contributions might well be dismissed underthe fashionable accusation of privilege — he was born into a wealthy family and his father, a prominent theologian, was independently wealthy himself a century and a half before the term “independently wealthy” entered the vernacular; his godfather was Ralph Waldo Emerson. But he also endured an undue share of physical hardship, suffering from a range of physical ailments since childhood — near-blindness, debilitating back pain, and various skin and stomach conditions — as well as regular bouts of severe, suicidal depression since early adulthood. His life was defined by dualities in deeper ways, too — James was a man straddling two epochs as a scholar of theology in an era when the dogmatic beliefs of the previous generation where past the point of repair and a science-minded skeptic before the golden age of twentieth-century scientific discovery.
And yet despite these vexing dualities, James navigated his life with tremendous faith in the power of personal choice in shaping one’s destiny — which included, as it always has and always will, the discomfiting luxury of making difficult decisions. Nearly four decades before he came to put this conviction into words in his timeless treatise on habit — “We are spinning our own fates, good or evil, and never to be undone.” — he enacted it in his own life as he stood on the precipice of a monumental choice, the kind all of us have to make at one point or another, the value of which we only ever appreciate in hindsight.
In 1861, 19-year-old William enrolled into Harvard to study science after a short apprenticeship with the artist William Morris Hunt. But as he immersed himself in the pursuit of a medical degree, he grew increasingly disillusioned with the prospects laid before him by this established path to a “successful” life as a respectable doctor — a life of steady income and steady petrification of his deeper aspirations. He knew he had to confront the trying choice between profit and purpose. (Around the same time, halfway around the world, a young Leo Tolstoy was tussling with a parallel tension between income and ideals.)
In a letter to his cousin Kitty from September of 1863, found in the altogether illuminating The Letters of William James, Vol. 1 (public libraryfree download), 21-year-old James outlines his choices with equal parts exasperation and snark:
I have four alternatives: Natural History, Medicine, Printing, Beggary… After all, the great problem of life seems to be how to keep body and soul together, and I have to consider lucre. To study natural science, I know I should like, but the prospect of supporting a family on $600 a year is not one of those rosy dreams of the future with which the young are said to be haunted. Medicine would pay, and I should still be dealing with subjects which interest me — but how much drudgery and of what an unpleasant kind is there!
He adds a lament about the crippling industrial model of higher education, which shoves young people down the conveyer belt of specialization and careerism before they’ve had a chance to find their true purpose — a lament equally, if not more, valid today:
The worst of this matter is that everyone must more or less act with insufficient knowledge — “go it blind,” as they say. Few can afford the time to try what suits them.
In a letter to his mother later that month, James exorcizes the growing urgency and unease of his impending choice:
I feel very much the importance of making soon a final choice of my business in life. I stand now at the place where the road forks. One branch leads to material comfort, the flesh-pots; but it seems a kind of selling of one’s soul. The other to mental dignity and independence; combined, however, with physical penury.
James, longing to be a family man, peers into the future and considers how choosing the pursuit of purpose over profit would affect his imaginary future love, to whom he refers by a Shakespearean allusion, as he revisits his four options:
If I myself were the only one concerned I should not hesitate an instant in my choice. But it seems hard on Mrs. W. J., “that not impossible she,” to ask her to share an empty purse and a cold hearth. On one side is science, upon the other business (the honorable, honored and productive business of printing seems most attractive), with medicine, which partakes of the advantages of both, between them, but which has drawbacks of its own. I confess I hesitate. I fancy there is a fond maternal cowardice which would make you and every other mother contemplate with complacency the worldly fatness of a son, even if obtained by some sacrifice of his “higher nature.” But I fear there might be some anguish in looking back from the pinnacle of prosperity (necessarily reached, if not by eating dirt, at least by renouncing some divine ambrosia) over the life you might have led in the pure pursuit of truth. It seems as if one couldnot afford to give that up for any bribe, however great.
And yet, admitting to being “undecided” still, James is aware of the rare privilege that renders him among those few young people who “can afford the time to try what suits them.” He tells his mother with a self-conscious wink:
I want you to become familiar with the notion that I maystick to science, however, and drain away at your property for a few years more.
James did choose to stick to science. Around the time he wrote that letter to his mother, he changed majors from Chemistry to Comparative Anatomy and Physiology — the Harvard department where he lucked into one of the most formative relationships of his life. There, he came to study under a professor named Jeffries Wyman, whose influence on James’s ideals and decisions became a spectacular testament to how unsung mentors and champions shape creative geniuses. A brilliant yet humble man — a perennially rare combination — he imparted on his pupils, by way of personal example, enduring values of kindness, generosity, humility, unflinching integrity, and resolute refusal to advance himself at anyone else’s expense. Under Wyman’s wing during those two critical years of determining the course of his entire life, James blossomed into himself — his ideals, his values, his character — with courageous authenticity. He would later come to write of his mentor:
His extraordinary effect on all who knew him is to be accounted for by the one word, character. Never was a man so absolutely without detractors. The quality which every one first thinks of in him is his extraordinary modesty, of which his unfailing geniality and serviceableness, his readiness to confer with and listen to younger men… Next were his integrity, and his complete and simple devotion to objective truth. These qualities were what gave him such incomparable fairness of judgment in both scientific and worldly matters… He had if anything too little of the ego in his composition, and all his faults were excesses of virtue. A little more restlessness of ambition, and a little more willingness to use other people for his purposes, would easily have made him more abundantly productive, and would have greatly increased the sphere of his effectiveness and fame. But his example on us younger men, who had the never-to-be-forgotten advantage of working by his side, would then have been, if not less potent, at least different from what we now remember it; and we prefer to think of him forever as the paragon that he was of goodness, disinterestedness, and single-minded love of the truth.
James graduated from Harvard with a degree in medicine, but wasn’t interested in practicing. Instead, he followed his calling and set out to study philosophy and psychology on his own, imbibing self-education with diligent visits to the Harvard and Boston libraries. He persevered through failing eyesight, debilitating depression, and frequent brushes with the very “beggary” he foresaw and feared. Decades later, having followed his purpose to become America’s first great psychologist, he joked“I never had any philosophic instruction, the first lecture on psychology I ever heard being the first I ever gave.”
The Letters of William James is full of soul-stretching insight into one of the greatest minds and most visionary spirits humanity has ever known, featuring James’s meditations on melancholy, happiness, writing, creativity, and human nature. His brother, the great novelist Henry James, captures this beautifully in the introduction to the 1920 edition:
Life spoke to him in even more ways than to most men, and he responded to its superabundant confusion with passion and insatiable curiosity. His spiritual development was a matter of intense personal experience.
Complement this particular snippet with a recentering read on how to find your purpose, then revisit Alan Watts on money vs. wealth and Eleanor Roosevelt on living with integrity.


NPR: Latin Music Celebrates "El Día de los Muertos"

Neil Gaiman Reimagines Hansel And Gretel

$
0
0

Neil Gaiman Reimagines Hansel & Gretel, with Gorgeous Black-and-White Illustrations by Italian Graphic Artist Lorenzo Mattotti

J.R.R. Tolkien memorably asserted that there is no such thing as writing "for children" and Maurice Sendak similarly scoffed that we shouldn't shield young minds from the dark. It's a sentiment that Neil Gaiman – one of the most enchanting and prolific writers of our time, a champion of the creative life,underappreciated artistdisciplined writer, andsage of literature – not only shares, in contemplating but also enacts beautifully in his work. More than a decade after his bewitching and widely beloved Coraline, Gaiman returns with another terrific embodiment of this ethos – his adaptation of the Brothers Grimm classicHansel & Gretel (public library), illustrated by Italian graphic artistLorenzo Mattotti, the talent behind Lou Reed's adaptation of The Raven.






The fairy tales of the Brothers Grimm have attracted a wealth of reimaginings over their long history, including interpretations as wide-ranging as those by David Hockney in 1970Edward Gorey in 1973, andPhilip Pullman in 2012. But Gaiman's is decidedly singular – a mesmerizing rolling cadence of language propelling a story that speaks to the part of the soul that revels in darkness but is immutably drawn to the light, that listens for the peculiar crescendo where the song of the dream becomes indistinguishable from the scream of the nightmare.








With stark subtlety, Mattotti's haunting visual interpretation amplifies the atmosphere that Gaiman so elegantly evokes.










In this wonderful short video, Gaiman discusses what makes fairy tales endure with legendary graphic storyteller Art Spiegelman and longtime New Yorker art director Françoise Mouly:

I think if you are protected from dark things then you have no protection of, knowledge of, or understanding of dark things when they show up. I think it is really important to show dark things to kids – and, in the showing, to also show that dark things can be beaten, that you have power. Tell them you can fight back, tell them you can win. Because you can – but you have to know that.
And for me, the thing that is so big and so important about the darkness is [that] it’s like in an inoculation... You are giving somebody darkness in a form that is not overwhelming – it’s understandable, they can envelop it, they can take it into themselves, they can cope with it. And, it’s okay, it’s safe to tell you that story – as long as you tell them that you can be smart, and you can be brave, and you can be tricky, and you can be plucky, and you can keep going.
Hansel & Gretel is wholly enthralling from cover to cover. It is also available as a deluxe edition – a lavish large-format volume with a die-cut cover, and dog knows die-cut treats are impossible to resist.


Complement it with Gaiman on why scary stories appeal to us, Tolkien on the psychology of fairy tales, and the best illustrations of the Brothers Grimm tales. For more of Mattotti's enchanting art, see his visual interpretation of Edgar Allan Poe.



Play Ball!

Jon Stewart Welcomes The Koch Brothers As Advertisers On The Daily Show

'Yes Is Such A Big And Powerful Word... Yes Is Who Americans Are And What We Do'

$
0
0
Dear Fred,

Thanks for this excellent issue of Frog Hospital.

Excerpt:"Yes is such a big important and powerful word! Yes is a most American word. Yes is who we are and what we do. Yes is Walt Whitman and the broad expanses of Kansas. Yes is Kurt Vonnegut saying Yes in spite of everything and everybody saying No. Yes is Oprah Winfrey and her trite confessions of self-esteem, but it is Yes, still Yes. Yes is winter in Chicago. Yes is the blues in New Orleans and Yes is the rain in Oregon."

No, you are NOT losing your touch.

Pax tecum

Alan
Inline image 1


On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Fred Owens <froghospital911@gmail.com> wrote:

FROG HOSPITAL – Celebrating Four Years in California

Nov. 2, 2014  ---- Unsubscribe anytime

Celebrating Four Years in California

By Fred Owens
It was four years ago this November. I worked the last day at Hedlin’s Farm Stand in LaConner. It was the end of the season and all the dahlias had been killed by an early frost…….. I closed up the shop. I had already stored my earthly goods at a generous barn on Beaver Marsh Road. It only remained for me to throw a few things in my trusty old Toyota and head south.

That was the smartest thing I have ever done. I am sure glad to be here in California – the Golden State. I love the sunshine. I love the beach. I love the lady I live with. It couldn’t be better.

One of the things I like about California is how big it is, and how important it is. I like living someplace that’s big and important. They make a lot of mistakes here in California – big mistakes – and I like that.
They make big mistakes because they – I mean we – are willing to throw it all in and give something a chance. The road to success is paved with a hundred failures…. Hey, I need to send an email to the Governor because I had this idea last night, it might sound a little crazy, but if we tried it …… That’s California.

Yes Means Yes

Speaking of big mistakes made in California, the Governor signed a law regulating sexual conduct at the university. Affirmative assent must be given and never assumed, the law states, on college campuses, although not elsewhere. This opens up the widest possible grammatical interpretations. 

Affirmative assent must be verbal, but must it also be oral?  There is a difference as you all know. 

And there is a crucial difference between “Yes you can” and “Yes you may.” Horny sophomores missing that fine point might find themselves in jail.

And No always means No, but does it mean No Not Now, or does it mean No Not Ever? This is a point of law that awaits adjudication. Bring on the lawyers.

There is a kind of progress here. We no longer have meddlesome priests dictating morality. No black-robed zealots screaming damnation. No clique of pinch-faced clerics inhibiting our natural desires. We are free of the Church, at last.

Unfortunately, that leaves the secular chieftains in charge. The poor college students – piling up massive debts while making painstaking bureaucratic distinctions at a Saturday night drinking brawl.  It will be a feast for the lawyers.

Personally, I avoid college campuses. I do not take these people seriously to any degree. 

Losing My Touch

That wasn’t even funny – what I just wrote. I’m losing my touch.

No, no, just let me try again. First, I know nothing about campus life in the year 2014, and if they say they have a problem, and if they say this is how they will deal with it, then who am I to go against them.

In other words, I have no knowledge about the nature of sexual congress among the young people. I only know they are tormented, passionate, idealistic and troubled. I only wish them the best, and I hope it can be wonderful for them.

But yes is such a word! Yes is such a big important and powerful word! Yes is a most American word. Yes is who we are and what we do. Yes is Walt Whitman and the broad expanses of Kansas. Yes is Kurt Vonnegut saying Yes in spite of everything and everybody saying No. Yes is Oprah Winfrey and her trite confessions of self-esteem, but it is Yes, still Yes. Yes is winter in Chicago. Yes is the blues in New Orleans and Yes is the rain in Oregon.

Yes means Yes, most emphatically and most completely Yes, most consciously and most deliberately Yes, and Yes forever and always Yes. 

Molly Bloom Said Yes

“I was a Flower of the mountain yes when I put the rose in my hair like the Andalusian girls used or shall I wear a red yes and how he kissed me under the Moorish wall and I thought well as well him as another and then I asked him with my eyes to ask again yes and then he asked me would I yes to say yes my mountain flower and first I put my arms around him yes and drew him down to me so he could feel my breasts all perfume yes and his heart was going like mad and yes I said yes I will Yes.”

Boston Legal

We are watching Season One of Boston Legal, with James Spader and William Shatner, first broadcast in 2004.  It’s a really good show. Candace Bergen will appear in later episodes and we look forward to her verbal combat with – Denny Crain!

It’s just that we got tired of those nasty violent shows, like Breaking Bad and Orange is the New Buffet Supper. You couldn’t pay me to watch a high school teacher cooking meth, or females wrestling in the penitentiary. It’s just too grim. Or even House of Cards, which is not violent but utterly, utterly cynical. The Kevin Spacey character has no redeeming virtues, making him flat and uninteresting, making his behavior quite predictable. 

Which leaves us with Game of Thrones, resplendent with slashing swords and gratuitous nudity. We deplore such violence but in this case we invoke the medieval exception. In other words, it’s okay because it happened in the Middle Ages with velvet costumes and prancing horses and great oaken woods – just a romping good time.

Please feel free to consult with me on your viewing choices – it would be my pleasure to offer any assistance.

Fred Owens
cell: 360-739-0214

My gardening blog is  Fred Owens
My writing blog is Frog Hospital

send mail to:

Fred Owens
35 West Main St Suite B #391
Ventura CA 93001


"The Politics Of Horror In Conservative Evangelicalism,"'09 Outstanding Academic Title

$
0
0
Religion of Fear:
The Politics of Horror in Conservative Evangelicalism
2009 CHOICE Outstanding Academic Title

Description

Conservative evangelicalism has transformed American politics, disseminating a sometimes fearful message not just through conventional channels, but through subcultures and alternate modes of communication. Within this world is a "Religion of Fear," a critical impulse that dramatizes cultural and political conflicts and issues in frightening ways that serve to contrast "orthodox" behaviors and beliefs with those linked to darkness, fear, and demonology. Jason Bivins offers close examinations of several popular evangelical cultural creations including the Left Behind novels, church-sponsored Halloween "Hell Houses," sensational comic books, especially those disseminated by Jack Chick, and anti-rock and -rap rhetoric and censorship. Bivins depicts these fascinating and often troubling phenomena in vivid (sometimes lurid) detail and shows how they seek to shape evangelical cultural identity.

As the "Religion of Fear" has developed since the 1960s, Bivins sees its message moving from a place of relative marginality to one of prominence. What does it say about American public life that such ideas of fearful religion and violent politics have become normalized? Addressing this question, Bivins establishes links and resonances between the cultural politics of evangelical pop, the activism of the New Christian Right, and the political exhaustion facing American democracy.

Religion of Fear is a significant contribution to our understanding of the new shapes of political religion in the United States, of American evangelicalism, of the relation of religion and the media, and the link between religious pop culture and politics.

3840x2160 Wallpaper the eye, fear, horror, hand, fingers, eye, eyelashes, pupil
"Any Religion That Needs Fear To Thrive Is Bad Religion"

Reviews

"Jason Bivins takes readers on an engaging but unsettling tour of 'the dark corners and sub-basements of American culture,' from Hell Houses to comic books, and along the way we learn a great deal about religion and politics in the United States. Indispensable for those interested in popular culture and conservative evangelicalism." --Thomas A. Tweed, author of Crossing and Dwelling: A Theory of Religion
"In this fine work of critical cultural analysis, Bivins finds the anxious heart of modern conservative evangelicalism in the United States, showing that fear, powerfully nurtured and exacerbated, has been a potent energizer of Christian public activism. This is a dark but necessary story. Democracy always has its demons, and it is best we know their names. This is a sharp work of social and religious analysis that deserves to be widely read." --Robert Orsi, Grace Craddock Nagle Chair in Catholic Studies, Northwestern University
"Jason Bivins takes us on a fantastic tour of Christian Right efforts to -- quite literally -- scare the hell out of true believers. Along the way, Religion of Fear reveals edgy new ways of drawing the age-old line between a righteous us and a sinful them. Lucid, graceful, fun, and disquieting." --James Morone, author of Hellfire Nation: The Politics of Sin in American History and coeditor of Healthy, Wealthy and Fair
"Well-written and clearly argued, Religion of Fear makes a major contribution to the study of religion in American culture. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-level undergraduates and above; general readers." --Choice
"Adroit and theoretically sophisticated... Bivins has offered a theoretically astute interpretive framework that is relevant for the analysis of far more than the particular examples to which he masterfully applies it in this book. Religion of Fear is a persuasive study in its own right, but it also offers critical tools for understanding our contemporary religio-political situation. In addition, it provides a compelling argument for attempting to do so. I recommend this book very highly, and I hope it acquires the rich and idverse readership within the academy and beyond that it clearly deserves." --Journal of the American Academy of Religion

About the Author(s)


Jason C. Bivins is Associate Professor of Religion at North Carolina State University and the author of The Fracture of Good Order: Christian Antiliberalism and the Challenge to American Politics. He lives in Durham, North Carolina.
   ***
Meet Jason Bivens - NPR Interview: 

***
Below are biographical sketches of two people who epitomize the Religion of Fear, and Fear as the cornerstone of "religion." 



***

Bill McKibben: "The Christian paradox: How a faithful nation gets Jesus wrong."


(And they don't want to find out.)


"Nutritious Acorns Don't Have To Just Be Snacks For Squirrels," NPR

$
0
0
To turn acorns into something edible, you've got to crack the shells, pick out the nut meats, weed out the bad ones, dry them and grind them into meal.
To turn acorns into something edible, you've got to crack the shells, pick out the nut meats, weed out the bad ones, dry them and grind them into meal.
Audio File: http://www.npr.org/player/v2/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=358527018&m=360859121
These days, Americans are all about eating local foods. But one important local crop drops to the ground mostly unnoticed every fall. Well, unless you're a squirrel. Yes, we're talking about acorns.
Although acorns don't get the love that hazelnuts and walnuts enjoy, this wasn't always the case.Bill Logan is an arborist in New York, who traced the history of eating acorns for his book Oak: The Frame of Civilization.
"There's a lot of references in ancient Greek literature to acorn," Logan recounts. "There's some suggestion that at some of the earliest central settlements, there are unexplained pits which may have been for storage of acorn." Logan also notes that in Tunisian, the word for oak means the "meal-bearing" tree.
And it makes sense that the history of acorn-eating spans the globe. Because oak trees are almost everywhere: "all through North America, down into South America," notes Logan. "Then across the way into Europe, from temperate Russia and south. And then you go on out into China, and then out into Southeast Asia."
But despite this wide geographic range and long culinary history, these days very few people eat acorns. Beyond the occasional enthusiastic forager, widespread consumption is pretty much limited to Korean cuisine (which favors an acorn jelly), and several Native American tribes. That's because while acorns do have a lot of good qualities — fats, protein and minerals — they also have some drawbacks, namely, tannins.
John Kallas, director of Wild Food Adventures, leads a class on making acorn pudding at his home in Portland, Ore. He shows students how to shell, grind, process and leach acorns to get a subtly flavored flour.
John Kallas, director of Wild Food Adventures, leads a class on making acorn pudding at his home in Portland, Ore. He shows students how to shell, grind, process and leach acorns to get a subtly flavored flour.
Leah Nash For NPR
If you've ever tried a raw acorn, and quickly spat it out, that's probably due to tannins. These compounds give raw acorns an astringent, puckery quality (they can also do some damage to your kidneys as well). But, as people have learned throughout history, tannins can be removed.
Students grind shelled acorns for a class on making acorn pudding led by John Kallas, in Portland, Ore.
Leah Nash For NPR
In Portland, Ore., wild food expert John Kallas teaches workshops on how to process acorns. Luckily the tannins are water-soluble, so you can leach them out with a few changes of water.
But you've also got to crack the shells (bricks, rocks and hammers were employed at the workshop), pick out the nut meats, weed out the bad ones and grind the nuts into meal. (At Kallas' workshop, that resulted in breaking one of the heavy metal grinder plates.) You've also got to dry the meats properly, as they have a tendency to grow mold quickly. All in all, not a terribly convenient food.
And after all that work, what are you left with? A very subtly flavored flour. Much like other starches, making acorns delicious is all about what you do with them — and what you top them with.
Kallas adds vanilla to acorns to make acorn pudding.
Kallas adds vanilla to acorns to make acorn pudding.
Leah Nash For NPR
Frank Lake comes from the Yurok and Karuk tribes of California. His traditional acorn preparation is a simple soup, cooked with hot stones directly in a basket. But whether it's soup or flatbreads, baked or stovetop, it all comes down to what you pair it with.
"For me, growing up eating acorns, it was always what you added to it," like grilled salmon, huckleberries or seaweed, says Lake.
Lake is a research ecologist with the U.S. Forest Service, working with the tribes on their acorn forests — or, as Lake likes to call them, orchards.
"We try to gather acorns and have them as part of our diet as much as we can," Lake explains. "But because of the changes in forest management, and particularly acorn quality, it went from being a staple, to then being more of a speciality food."
Lake says tribal oak orchards have shrunk due to a few factors: losing land, not burning off enough of the undergrowth to clear out pests that can destroy acorns (namely a pesky weevil) and favoring fast-growing timber trees over slow-growing oak.
But there are many places where oaks are thriving — or they've actually been planted, because of their nice picnic-friendly canopies. And there, Lake says, acorns can be great untapped resource.
There are a few businesses starting to explore this commercially, making acorn flour crackers. But for the most part, the acorn market is still the realm of backyard enthusiasts who are willing to undergo the collecting, grinding, leaching, drying and baking on their own. Which means there should be plenty of nuts left for the squirrels.

Let The Chaos Begin: Cruz Will "Take On" Obama; Won't Vow Support For McConnell

$
0
0
 November 2, 2014   
 Sen. Ted Cruz spent the final weekend of the midterms on the far edge of the country trying to help fellow Republican Dan Sullivan win a race the GOP is counting on in its effort to retake the Senate.
It’s a team-player role the tea party firebrand from Texas has filled a handful of times this fall — but one he plans to abandon if Republicans win control of both congressional chambers.
In an interview at the Hotel Captain Cook here between campaign stops for Sullivan, Cruz made it clear he would push hard for a Republican-led Senate to be as conservative and confron­tational as the Republican-led House.
Piggybacking on what House leaders have done, Cruz said the first order of business should be a series of hearings on President Obama, “looking at the abuse of power, the executive abuse, the regulatory abuse, the lawlessness that sadly has pervaded this administration.”
Cruz also would like the Senate to be as aggressive in trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act as the House, which has voted more than 50 times to get rid of the law.

Republicans should “pursue every means possible to repeal Obamacare,” Cruz said, including forcing a vote through parliamentary procedures that would get around a possible filibuster by Democrats. If that leads to a veto by Obama, Cruz said, Republicans should then vote on provisions of the health law “one at a time.”
And when asked whether he would back Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky for Republican leader, Cruz would not pledge his support — an indication that there are limits to how much of a partner he’s willing to be.
At the heart of Cruz’s shift from the insular approach that defined his first year in office is a belief that he can use his popularity with conservatives to expand his influence in the Senate and improve his standing as he considers a 2016 presidential campaign.
Cruz’s desire to turn his party further right in the coming months is one of the challenges already facing McConnell should Republicans regain the Senate, with tea party leaders inside and outside the Capitol spoiling for a number of hard-line moves.
“Senator Cruz has been rather quiet over the past few months,” said Ron Bonjean, a spokesman for Trent Lott when the Mississippian was the Senate Republican leader. “That time seems to be coming to an end. I understand why he’s eager to go after Obamacare. But the reality is that it’ll take 60 votes to repeal it and Republicans will have nowhere near that amount. If Obamacare remains the focus, he will certainly get the base jazzed up about what he’s doing, but he won’t get rid of the law.”
Cruz has gained some traction in terms of shaping the contours of what a Republican Senate would do, in part because McConnell and House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) have not offered their own definitive vision of what a Republican-led Congress would look like.
Two weeks ago, Cruz wrote an opinion piece in USA Today laying out 10 conservative priorities he thinks Republicans should pursue, including moving toward a flat tax and drawing a hard line on illegal immigrants. In the interview here, Cruz reiterated some of those points, such as approving the Keystone XL pipeline.
McConnell has mostly been coy about what he would like to accomplish other than adding amendments to curb federal regulations to spending bills as a means of putting pressure on the president.
“It’s never a good idea to tell the other side what the first play is going to be,” McConnell said at an event last month.
Cruz is not interested in adding amendments that may put indirect pressure on Obama. He favors direct political combat. That way, either the president gives in, or, Cruz said, “you have clear accountability. It becomes transparent to everyone that it is the Democrats blocking meaningful progress.”
Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), a Long Island moderate, said Republicans should be wary of Cruz’s guidance. “He is the last one we should listen to,” King said in an interview Sunday. “Don’t forget — a year ago he brought Republicans over the cliff.”
Still, Cruz’s help on the trail has improved his image among some Republicans, while easing a measure of the anger aimed at him from some of the donors and colleagues he infuriated in October 2013 when he led a shutdown of the government.
Cruz should be able to count on a handful of new friends, if not allies, when the Senate convenes next year. In recent weeks, he has campaigned for Senate contenders who beat Cruz-admiring insurgents in Republican primaries, from businessman David Perdue in Georgia and state Sen. Joni Ernst in Iowa to Sullivan and Sen. Pat Roberts, Kansas’s embattled incumbent.
If she wins, Ernst is poised to be a powerful player in the run-up to the Iowa caucuses, the first nominating contest in the 2016 race for the GOP presidential nomination. Perdue, who has weak ties to his red state’s GOP base, could hew close to Cruz on some votes to keep conservatives in Georgia at bay. Sullivan, for similar reasons, could do the same.
Cruz is not the only conservative Republican with national ambitions who is working to show skeptical Republicans that they can do more than squabble. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has cut ads for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, one of the groups that opposed tea party candidates in Senate primaries, and stumped for moderate former Massachusetts senator Scott Brown, who is running for Senate in New Hampshire.
Cruz declined to say whether he’s going to run for president, but was dismissive of moderates in his party, particularly those who may challenge him for the 2016 Republican nomination. Of Jeb Bush, for instance, Cruz said he likes and respects him, “but I think we have seen election after election that when Republicans fail to draw a clear distinction with the Democrats, when we run to the mushy middle, we lose.”
“At some point,” Cruz continued, “after Gerald Ford and Bob Dole and John McCain and Mitt Romney . . . we shouldn’t keep making the same mistakes over and over again.
“One of the reasons Republicans have lost elections recently is that we have failed to engage in a meaningful way on the great issues of the day,” Cruz said. “We’ve played a prevent defense. You don’t win elections that way.”

Nik Wallenda Walks High Wire Between Chicago Skyscrapers

Paul Krugman: Business Leaders Habitually Give Bad Advice On The Economy

$
0
0
KRUGMAN: Business leaders habitually give bad advice on the economy. Many people expect the business community to have a useful perspective on economic policy. "But success in business does not seem to convey any special insight into economic policy." Managing a national economy is just a very different job than managing a business. The New York Times.


Why Is Obama Unpopular? Economy Rescued. Ebola Trivial. ISIS In Retreat

$
0
0

"Brazen Lies About Obama"

"Obama Hatred"

The American Conservative: "Obama Is A Republican"

DOUTHAT: But why is Obama so unpopular? People might be upset about his policies on health care, the economy or foreign affairs, or they might blame him for dysfunction in Congress. Yet while these issues might move voters away from Democrats, they might not push them toward Republicans either. The G.O.P. still has work to do in defining a positive and compelling agenda. The New York Times.

BLOW: Part of the reason might be that he's black. On the other hand, the president's race has also guaranteed him the support of the black community, whom Democrats are relying on heavily to turn out on Tuesday. The New York Times.




Racism And Xenophobia Contribute To The Irrational Fear Of Ebola

$
0
0

"Ebola Represents A Trivial Threat To Americans' Health"

Racism and xenophobia contribute to the irrational fear of Ebola. Psychological research shows that people worried about disease have more negative attitudes toward immigrants from Africa rather than Asia, and many Americans (wrongly) believe that people infected with Ebola are crossing the Mexican border. It's hard to imagine the public responding the same way to a disease that originated in Canada. Leon Krauze in The New Republic.



"Self-Terrorization Is The National Pastime"

Air Space Restrictions Designed To Keep News Helicopters From Filming Ferguson

$
0
0

"Bad Black People." Why Bill O'Reilly Is Wrong Even When He's Right"


***

Airspace restrictions were intended to keep news helicopters from filming protests in Ferguson. In recorded telephone conversations, the Federal Aviation Administration and police in Ferguson discussed how to keep media from flying over the protests there this summer, while allowing other commercial aircraft to pass through the area. Jack Gillum and Joan Lowy for the Associated Press.



Netherlands Closing 19 Prisons Due To Declining Crime Rates

$
0
0
Alan: Maybe it's the Socialism?
The United States has more incarcerated more citizens per capita than any country - ever! 
Maybe it's the Capitalism?
***
The reason the Netherlands Is closing its prisons is staggering, especially for the American reader: there are not enough offenders because of the country’s progressive philosophy and best practices it is using. 

The Criminal Justice Alliance (CJA), representing over 60 organisations, called for the government to urgently limit “unnecessary use of prison, ensuring it is reserved for serious, persistent and violent offenders for whom no alternative sanction is appropriate”.

In 2009, the Dutch justice ministry announced a plan to close eight prisons in the Netherlands. Why? A declining crime rate that is expected to continue. In 2013, a staggering 19 prisons were scheduled to close. Officials have announced they are in the process of cutting 3,500 jobs.

How did they do it?

Primary reasons for fewer offenders and prisoners in the Netherlands include a continued general decline in crime rates, a focus on rehabilitation of offenders, progressive drug laws, and also, those convicted are choosing electronic tagging instead of incarceration.

The tagging allows people to go back to work and continue as productive members of society. Not only that, it saves approximately $50,000 per year per person (about $50 million saved annually for every 1000 people).

A prison overcrowding report last year in the Nehterlands noted that surging prison populations undermined rehabilitation of prisoners and risked increasing reoffending in the future.

Declining crime rates in the Netherlands mean that, although the country has the capacity for 14,000 prisoners, there are only 12,000 detainees, reported the nrc.nl.

The decrease is expected to continue, the ministry said, with Deputy justice minister Nebahat Albayrak saying that natural redundancy and other measures should counter any forced lay-offs.

Johnson County and the Netherlands have something in common. The average incarceration rate in the Netherlands is about 163 people per 100,000. In Johnson County, the rate of incarceration is the about the same – slightly lower. (Source: 2012 Annual Sheriff’s Report – PDF)

Counties and countries with low incarceration rates typically take a different approach to criminal justice and investing in social services. 

In comparison, the United States “tough on crime” focused justice and prison systems are failing miserably. Overall, the incarceration rate is 10 times higher in the U.S. than it is in the Netherlands.


The Dutch largely kept the Napoleonic Code after their independence, but made it significantly more rehabilitative. The Dutch incarceration philosophy stresses the need to minimize hardships on the prisoner and emphasizes maximizing prisoner contacts with family and the preservation of community ties. (Downes, David. (2007) Visions of Penal Control in the Netherlands, p. 117. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007. ISBN 0-226-80664-5)

Crime rates have fallen slightly in recent years in the Netherlands but are not notably lower there than in neighboring countries,

Prisoners are able to enjoy many of the benefits of life on the outside. For example, inmates can receive visitors once a week, talk on the phone, and participate in sports.
Sources: True Activist, News 13 (Amsterdam) Wikipedia, We Are Change Netherlands,  www.beyondblindfold.com, Eric Barlow

Jaw Dropping Truths

$
0
0

Tom Magliozzi, Popular Co-Host Of NPR's 'Car Talk,' Dies At 77

$
0
0
Tom Magliozzi's laugh boomed in NPR listeners' ears every week as he and his brother, Ray, bantered on Car Talk.
Tom Magliozzi's laugh boomed in NPR listeners' ears every week as he and brother Ray, bantered on Car Talk.The Car Guys, Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_Talk
Tom Magliozzi, one of public radio's most popular personalities, died on Monday of complications from Alzheimer's disease. He was 77 years old.
Tom and his brother, Ray, became famous as "Click and Clack the Tappet Brothers" on the weekly NPR show Car Talk. They bantered, told jokes, laughed and sometimes even gave pretty good advice to listeners who called in with their car troubles.
If there was one thing that defined Tom Magliozzi, it was his laugh. It was loud, it was constant, it was infectious.
Tom (right) and Ray grew up great friends despite a 12-year gap between them. Both graduated from MIT before going into the car repair business.
Courtesy of Car Talk
"His laugh is the working definition of infectious laughter," says Doug Berman, the longtime producer of Car Talk. He remembers the first time he ever encountered Magliozzi.
"Before I ever met him, I heard him, and it wasn't on the air," he recalls.
Berman was the news director of WBUR at the time.
"I'd just hear this laughter," he says. "And then there'd be more of it, and people would sort of gather around him. He was just kind of a magnet."
The Magliozzi brothers grew up in a tough neighborhood of East Cambridge, Mass., in a close-knit Italian family. Tom was 12 years older, the beloved older brother to Ray. They liked to act like they were just a couple of regular guys who happened to be mechanics, but both of them graduated from MIT.
After getting out of college, Tom Magliozzi went to work as an engineer. One day he had a kind of epiphany, he told graduates when he and Ray gave the 1999 commencement address at their alma mater.
He was on his way to work when he had a near-fatal accident with a tractor-trailer. He pulled off the road and decided to do something different with his life.
"I quit my job," he said. "I became a bum. I spent two years sitting in Harvard Square drinking coffee. I invented the concept of the do-it-yourself auto repair shop, and I met my lovely wife."
Well, he wasn't exactly a bum; he worked as a consultant and college professor, eventually getting a doctoral degree in marketing. And Tom and Ray Magliozzi did open that do-it-yourself repair shop in the early '70s. They called it Hackers Heaven. Later they opened a more traditional car repair shop called the Good News Garage.
They got into radio by accident when someone from the local public radio station, WBUR, was putting together a panel of car mechanics for a talk show.
"They called Ray, and Ray thought it was a dumb idea, so he said, 'I'll send my brother' and Tom thought, 'Great, I'll get out of breaking my knuckles for a couple of hours.' And he went over and he was the only one who showed up," Berman says.
Berman says the station liked what Tom did and asked him to come back the next week. This time he brought Ray. The rest, as they say, is history.
In 1987 Car Talk went national on NPR. The Magliozzi brothers were a huge success. Listeners loved their blend of humor, passion, expertise and just plain silliness.

The Tollbooth Fugitive

On one episode of Car Talk, a woman called in because she had failed to pay a toll on a bridge and was worried about getting caught. Tom had the idea of calling the person in charge of the bridge. The ensuing conversation is hilarious.
When it came to cars, Berman says the brothers really did know what they were talking about. But, he says, that's not why people listen to the show.
"I think it has very little to do with cars," he says. "It's the guys' personalities. And Tom especially — really a genius. With a great, facile mind. And he's mischievous. He likes to prod people into honesty."
It is almost impossible to talk about Tom Magliozzi without talking about Ray. Berman says the affection you heard on the radio dated back to their childhood — and it was real.
"For Ray, he idolized Tom. This is the guy who introduced him to everything in life, and Tom liked having his little brother around," Berman says. "He liked the guy. So when they grew up they were really, really great friends."
Tom and Ray haven't done the show live for two years; Car Talk has been airing archives of old shows. Berman says Ray would like to continue doing that, as a tribute to his brother.

TED: Can Prosthetic Body Parts Be Better Then The Originals?

Viewing all 30150 articles
Browse latest View live