Quantcast
Channel: Pax on both houses
Viewing all 30150 articles
Browse latest View live

Disillusioned Ex-Relief Manager Of Red Cross No Longer Donates To The Organization

$
0
0
American Red Cross CEO Gail McGovern speaks at a post-Sandy press conference on Staten Island, N.Y. But two pastors, who organized much of that area's relief efforts, say they did so without the aid of the Red Cross.
American Red Cross CEO Gail McGovern speaks at a post-Sandy press conference on Staten Island, N.Y. But two pastors, who organized much of that area's relief efforts, say they did so without the aid of the Red Cross.
Charitable Giving Recommendationshttp://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2013/12/charitable-giving-recommendations.htmlCharity Navigator: Top Rated Charitieshttp://www.charitywatch.org/toprated.html***
Americans donated more than $300 million to the American Red Cross after Superstorm Sandy in 2012. Some are challenging the charity's effectiveness and its priorities. This isn't the first time.
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
This week we have been reporting on the American Red Cross and its performance around Superstorm Sandy. After that storm devastated parts of the East Coast two years ago, Americans donated more than $300 million to the charity, but now some are challenging the charity's effectiveness and its priorities.
NPR and ProPublica obtained internal documents suggesting that the American Red Cross put public relations ahead of helping the needy. In the second of two stories, NPR's Laura Sullivan reports that the problems didn't begin with Sandy.
LAURA SULLIVAN, BYLINE: There's a picture online of Gail McGovern, the head of the American Red Cross, two weeks into Superstorm Sandy's recovery. She's standing at a podium at a press conference on Staten Island. And behind her, as a sort of backdrop, two of the charity's emergency vehicles sit idle. It's a frustrating image for two pastors who organized much of that area's relief efforts. Reverends Daniel Delgado and John Rocco Carlo were barely three miles away here in the parking lot of Carlo's Christian Pentecostal Church.
REVEREND DANIEL DELGADO: This is where we were able to set up. We set up tents here.
SULLIVAN: In the days after the storm, thousands of people gathered on this black asphalt for help. But the pastors say the Red Cross wasn't among those who showed up.
DELGADO: They gave us nothing - not a shovel, not a rake - nothing.
REVEREND JOHN ROCCO CARLO: Every commercial on the news - give, you know, and they would show pictures, and I'd recognize the pictures. I was like, you guys weren't there.
SULLIVAN: Delgado and Carlo organized their own box truck deliveries and started serving 8,000 meals a day. It's the kind of thing they thought the Red Cross would be doing. When workers did trickle in in the days and weeks that followed, Delgado and Carlo say they were impressed with the volunteers but not the organization.
DELGADO: We had to give them blankets.
CARLO: That's right. Yes, we did.
SULLIVAN: NPR and ProPublica obtained internal documents and emails and interviewed top current and former officials. They depict an organization struggling to feed, clothe and shelter, and one that put public relations and the appearance of helping people over actually helping them.
But while the documents and officials say these problems came to a head during Sandy, their origins go back years. The Red Cross face allegations of financial mismanagement after 9/11 and a slow and incompetent response after Hurricane Katrina. In recent years, the charity has been beset with budget problems and the loss of talented staff. And several top officials described a problematic response to Hurricane Isaac, which hit Mississippi and Louisiana in 2012.
TREVOR RIGGEN: I will say that Isaac was a logistics challenge on moving people around, and so we were additionally, you know, somewhat limited in the resources we had on hand.
SULLIVAN: Trevor Riggen is the Red Cross's vice president of Disaster Services. And he says the organization has recently improved its supply chain and reorganized its workforce. But he denies the charity would ever put public affairs over the needs of clients in any storm.
RIGGEN: I would just disagree that that was driving our service delivery at all. I don't believe that that's the way that our leadership has used resources on the ground or that that was a driving factor in their decisions.
SULLIVAN: Several current and formal top Red Cross officials see it differently.
Are you Richard?
RICHARD RIECKENBERG: I am.
SULLIVAN: I'm Laura. It's so nice to meet you.
Richard Rieckenberg lives in a beige, adobe-style house half-hour outside of Santa Fe. He joined the Red Cross after 20 years in the Navy as a chief engineer on nuclear submarines. And he managed relief efforts for dozens of the nation's disasters since 2005.
RIECKENBERG: I think the Red Cross serves an important function. I wouldn't give you this interview if I didn't think that the Red Cross needs to hear it.
SULLIVAN: Rieckenberg says the Red Cross was one of the best jobs he's had. But in recent years, small incidents started to pile up about the time the Red Cross started facing large budget deficits. By 2012, when Hurricane Isaac hit, Rieckenberg says the organization was unprepared, undersupplied and understaffed.
RIECKENBERG: We didn't have food in the shelters. We didn't have cots. We didn't have blankets in the shelter, which to me was incredible because we saw this hurricane coming a long way away.
SULLIVAN: According to internal documents and emails, he wasn't the only top official to feel that way. Bob Scheifle ran the Red Cross's recovery efforts in Louisiana.
BOB SCHEIFLE: Which one is more important: giving the person the hot meal or telling somebody that you did it? I think it's the former.
SULLIVAN: Scheifle still works for the Red Cross, and he believes in it. But he says after Isaac, he was angry. He thought the organization was becoming too focused on image.
SCHEIFLE: We do things right because it's important and right to do it, not because it looks good. We don't do it because the television cameras are looking at us from the corner.
SULLIVAN: Another current Red Cross official who spoke on condition of anonymity described an incident during Isaac in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, where the charity sent out as many as 80 trucks to drive around neighborhoods with little or nothing in them.
Richard Rieckenberg says he remembers it well, too. It was days into the storm, and the bulk of the supplies still hadn't arrived. The trucks were sitting in a parking lot.
RIECKENBERG: We were directed to send them out and drive through the communities. And we didn't have anything in them.
SULLIVAN: The idea, Rieckenberg says, was to make it appear as though the Red Cross was delivering supplies.
RIECKENBERG: That's demoralizing. It's wrong. It's probably not the worst thing you can do, but it's wrong.
SULLIVAN: Red Cross officials say they are unaware of any such incident and don't believe it happened. They say sometimes empty trucks are sent out to do reconnaissance to find where relief supplies are needed. But Jim Dunham is a Red Cross volunteer who says he drove an empty truck. He didn't want to talk on tape, but he says he was told to just get out there and be seen, be seen, be seen. He describes the relief effort as, quote, "worse than the storm."
Bob Scheifle says he heard a lot of complaints from volunteers during Isaac and other disasters. He said he believes they were warranted. Many of the workers are retirees, and they'd come and tell him the same thing.
SCHEIFLE: I'm retired. I don't need to do this stuff. Why am I banging my head against the wall when this guy tells me to go this way and halfway there, I get scolded, and I'm told to go this way? Your most important product is the lowest ranking person out there who's going to serve the food on the clamshell. That's the person that we have to nurture. And I don't think that they disagree. It's just that they haven't gotten there yet.
SULLIVAN: In Isaac, many volunteers were also frustrated because Red Cross officials at headquarters sent almost 500 of them to Tampa, the site of the Republican National Convention, even though the National Hurricane Center said five days out the hurricane was headed much farther west.
After the storm, Bob Scheifle and Rich Rieckenberg took their concerns first in an email and then in person to Red Cross headquarters. Rieckenberg wrote to Trevor Riggen, the vice president. He said the last three disasters he had worked were marked by, quote, "political wrangling, power struggles and ineffectiveness." In the interview, Riggen said he did not agree with that assessment.
RIGGEN: I did take those seriously, but I just don't see a striving service delivery for public affairs purposes.
SULLIVAN: Two years ago, however, in an email when he wrote Rieckenberg back, he said, from a broad perspective, I completely agree with you. Much of this is extremely systemic. Rieckenberg says by the time Superstorm Sandy hit later that year, he and many other disaster responders were demoralized. One of his last memories of the storm was standing in a kitchen in New York where volunteers had just been ordered to produce meals that ended up going to waste. He listened as someone from headquarters called one of the volunteers and berated her over the phone.
RIECKENBERG: I felt so ashamed and - so, I just felt ashamed. And I used to teach a course on leadership for the Red Cross, and one of the principles was from Colin Powell. He said if you are unable or unwilling to solve the problems of your people then you are not a leader. And I said, that's me. I'm unable to solve these problems. And so I can't stay here.
SULLIVAN: After leading the disaster efforts for more than two dozen of the country's worst storms in the past decade, Richard Rieckenberg resigned from the Red Cross.
Do you think that people should donate to the Red Cross?
RIECKENBERG: I don't donate to the Red Cross. So people should do what they think is best for them.
SULLIVAN: For more than a hundred years, the Red Cross has welcomed millions of people into its shelters, helped them out in trouble and handed them a blanket and a cup of coffee when they needed it most. But for many on the ground, and even many who work there, the question is whether the nation's most venerable disaster relief organization is still up to the job. Laura Sullivan, NPR News.
GREENE: And you can see documents and photos from this investigation at our website and at propublica.org This is MORNING EDITION from NPR News. I'm David Greene.
RENEE MONTAGNE, BYLINE: And I'm Renee Montagne.

  • Avatar


    I've been a volunteer with the American Red Cross for the last 7 years. I may not be aware of every aspect of the organization in it's entirety, but I've been involved with enough volunteers and staffers at the local chapter level to know that this piece doesn't do the organization as a whole much justice.
    Dig in to just about any non-profit, and you're sure to find improprieties, but to dig into an organization whose main purpose is to unite willing volunteers with those in need of help is just plain wrong. Without the Public Image work that is villainized by this piece, the Red Cross couldn't function. The American public isn't going to just give money to any organization without seeing some signs of their money at work. Should those efforts overstep the relief efforts on the ground? Absolutely not, but to act like an organization whose main source of funding comes from the public shouldn't have a major public image campaign to go with every disaster is unrealistic.
    Times are tight for everyone these days. No one's responses to recent disasters have been where they should have been, but 92.2% of every donation made to the Red Cross goes directly to responding to people in need. Only 4% is spent on administrative, and about 3.7% is spent on fundraising campaigns.
    I appreciate the work that NPR does as a whole, and I'm not saying that you shouldn't report on certain improprieties of any major organization, but this piece went too far.





    Sweden Recognizes Palestinian State

    $
    0
    0

    Sweden Recognizes Palestinian State; Israel Upset
    Inform

    Why Sweden recognized the Palestinian state 

    Sweden joins Malta and Cyprus, as the third European nation officially recognizing a Palestinian state.  The British Parliament also voted to recognize the Palestinian state earlier this month, in a symbolic vote. 

    Christian Science Monitor

    By , Associated Press 

    Sweden's new left-leaning government on Thursday recognized a Palestinian state — a move that comes during increased tensions between Arabs and Jews over Israel's plans to build about 1,000 housing units in east Jerusalem.
    The EU member became the third Western European nation, after Malta and Cyprus, to do so, reflecting growing international impatience with Israel's nearly half-century control of the West Bank, east Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip.
    Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom said Sweden made the move becausePalestine had fulfilled the international law criteria required for such recognition.
    Recommended: How much do you know about the Palestinians? Take our quiz
    "There is a territory, a people and government," she told reporters in Stockholm.

    Israel was quick to condemn Sweden's announcement, with Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman describing it as "a miserable decision that strengthens the extremist elements and Palestinian rejectionism."
    "It's a shame that the government of Sweden chose to take a declarative step that only causes harm," he added.
    Israel says Palestinians can gain independence only through peace negotiations, and that recognition of Palestine at the U.N. or by individual countries undermines the negotiating process. Palestinians say Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu isn't serious about the peace negotiations.
    The latest round of U.S.-brokered talks collapsed in April. American officials have hinted that Israel's tough negotiating stance hurt the talks, and Netanyahu has continued to settle Israelis in the West Bank and east Jerusalem.
    More than 550,000 Israelis now live in the two areas, greatly complicating hopes of partitioning the area under a future peace deal. The two territories and the Gaza Strip are claimed by Palestinians for a future state.
    While the U.S. and European powers have so far refrained from recognizing Palestinian independence, they have become increasingly critical of Israeli settlement construction. The 28-nation European Union has urged that negotiations to achieve a two-state solution resume as soon as possible.
    British lawmakers earlier this month voted in favor of recognizing Palestine as a state. 
    Former Israeli ambassador to the US Michael Oren warned the Israeli government it should not discount the significance of the British MPs’ vote,reported The Guardian.
    In an interview with the website Ynet, Oren insisted that the “support expressed by Britain for the establishment of the Palestinian state is much more important than the Swedish one, and is being underestimated”.
    “Britain is a member of the UN security council. The Palestinians are going to the UN in November and they want at least nine votes in the security council (to force Israel to commit to a timeline for withdrawing from the West Bank). There is a chance America will abstain, but a lot of it is up to us.
    “Britain is one of our closest friends and allies, and still 274 parliament members supported the (non-binding) movement, with only 12 objecting.
    Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    What Would Republicans Do WIth Control Of Congress? Cut Taxes? Repeal ACA? New War?

    $
    0
    0

    "Why Winning The Senate Would Be A GOP Nightmare"

    ***

    Alan: The Party that believes "Government is the problem" can do nothing with government but trash it. Where The Invisible Hand rules, any attempt to make government a vehicle for The Common Good is a betrayal of "religious" principle. 

    Bring on the clowns. 

    It's their last gasp.

    Do Republicans have a plan for the country? The answer is ‘no’.

    Eugene Robinson
    October 30, 2014


    No matter how well Republicans do at the polls Tuesday — and my hunch is they won’t do as well as they hope — the GOP won’t be able to claim any kind of mandate. That’s because they have refused to articulate any vision for governing.
    Eugene Robinson writes a twice-a-week column on politics and culture, contributes to the PostPartisan blog, and hosts a weekly online chat with readers. In a three-decade career at The Post, Robinson has been city hall reporter, city editor, foreign correspondent in Buenos Aires and London, foreign editor, and assistant managing editor in charge of the paper’s Style section. View Archive
    I do not celebrate this failure. I’ve always believed the nation’s interest is best served by competition in the marketplace of ideas. An innovative, forward-looking conservative platform would force those of us who call ourselves progressives to update and sharpen our own thinking.
    Sadly, this year’s campaign has been dull and disheartening. It is a testament to the cynicism of our times that the failure of most candidates to say anything meaningful is intentional. The near-universal message isn’t “vote for me.” It’s “vote against my opponent.”
    Actually, that’s not quite accurate. The dominant Republican message is an exhortation to vote against someone who’s not on any ballot: President Obama.
    There’s nothing new or dishonorable about running against the policies of an unpopular president. But Republicans aren’t actually running against Obama’s policies in any meaningful way. Instead, they are conducting a campaign of atmospherics. Be afraid, they tell voters. Be unhappy. Be angry.
    For the activist far right — already brimming with fear, anxiety and ire to spare — GOP candidates promise to obliterate Obama’s most significant achievement, the Affordable Care Act. This pledge has always been shamefully dishonest. Even if Republicans capture the Senate and manage to pass one of the umpteen House bills repealing all or part of Obamacare, the president will simply veto the measure. Do even the most fervent right-wingers believe Obama will ever, under any circumstances, sign legislation doing away with landmark reforms that bear his name ?
    Republicans talk about “repeal and replace” but feel no obligation to elaborate on the “replace” part. If they were being honest, they would admit that the need to keep the consumer-friendly parts of Obamacare — especially the provision forbidding insurance companies to deny coverage because of pre-existing conditions — would require them to enact a program that would be virtually identical, although it would surely have a different name. Maybe they’d call it “Not Obamacare.”
    What else do Republicans say they would do? Nothing, really, that you can put your finger on.
    They make much of the menace presented by the Islamic State and blame Obama for the jihadist group’s conquest of territory in Iraq and Syria. But what do they propose to do differently? Does anybody know?
    If there is a Republican solution to the upheaval in the Middle East, we ought to know about it because Congress should have debated a measure authorizing the use of U.S. military force against the Islamic State. Instead, both houses chose to duck their constitutional responsibility. It’s much easier to complain that Obama is doing everything wrong than to take a stand on the most solemn question our elected officials can possibly face: whether to go to war.
    Incredibly, Republicans have even tried to politicize the response to the Ebola outbreak. This just in: Viruses do not care one whit about party affiliation, with the possible exception of tea party fever.
    I’ve noted in the past that critics yelling “stop the flights” must be unaware that there are no direct flights from the affected countries to the United States. Experts have noted that travel bans and forced quarantines will disproportionately affect returning health workers — and if they are imposed in an uninformed, bullying manner, as New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie attempted to do with nurse Kaci Hickox, they can make it more difficult to contain the epidemic at its source, which is the only way Americans can be safe in the long run.
    During Obama’s time in office, unemployment has fallen dramatically, millions of jobs have been created and the economy is growing. What do Republicans have to say about this record? Instead of acknowledging the obvious — and perhaps explaining how they would build on the president’s success — they change the subject. “We can do better,” they claim, without making the slightest effort to explain how.
    I wish I could say that Democrats have taken the high road by presenting their own fresh ideas. I can’t. Mostly, they threaten voters with scary descriptions of what Republicans would do on social and economic issues if given more power.
    We’re being asked to vote out of resentment and grim duty. So much for what Lincoln called “the better angels of our nature.”
    Read more from Eugene Robinson’s archivefollow him on Twitter orsubscribe to his updates on Facebook. You can also join him Tuesdays at 1 p.m. for a live Q&A.
    Read more about this topic:
    No matter how well Republicans do at the polls Tuesday — and my hunch is they won’t do as well as they hope — the GOP won’t be able to claim any kind of mandate. That’s because they have refused to articulate any vision for governing.
    Eugene Robinson writes a twice-a-week column on politics and culture, contributes to the PostPartisan blog, and hosts a weekly online chat with readers. In a three-decade career at The Post, Robinson has been city hall reporter, city editor, foreign correspondent in Buenos Aires and London, foreign editor, and assistant managing editor in charge of the paper’s Style section. View Archive
    I do not celebrate this failure. I’ve always believed the nation’s interest is best served by competition in the marketplace of ideas. An innovative, forward-looking conservative platform would force those of us who call ourselves progressives to update and sharpen our own thinking.
    Sadly, this year’s campaign has been dull and disheartening. It is a testament to the cynicism of our times that the failure of most candidates to say anything meaningful is intentional. The near-universal message isn’t “vote for me.” It’s “vote against my opponent.”
    Actually, that’s not quite accurate. The dominant Republican message is an exhortation to vote against someone who’s not on any ballot: President Obama.
    There’s nothing new or dishonorable about running against the policies of an unpopular president. But Republicans aren’t actually running against Obama’s policies in any meaningful way. Instead, they are conducting a campaign of atmospherics. Be afraid, they tell voters. Be unhappy. Be angry.
    For the activist far right — already brimming with fear, anxiety and ire to spare — GOP candidates promise to obliterate Obama’s most significant achievement, the Affordable Care Act. This pledge has always been shamefully dishonest. Even if Republicans capture the Senate and manage to pass one of the umpteen House bills repealing all or part of Obamacare, the president will simply veto the measure. Do even the most fervent right-wingers believe Obama will ever, under any circumstances, sign legislation doing away with landmark reforms that bear his name ?
    Republicans talk about “repeal and replace” but feel no obligation to elaborate on the “replace” part. If they were being honest, they would admit that the need to keep the consumer-friendly parts of Obamacare — especially the provision forbidding insurance companies to deny coverage because of pre-existing conditions — would require them to enact a program that would be virtually identical, although it would surely have a different name. Maybe they’d call it “Not Obamacare.”
    What else do Republicans say they would do? Nothing, really, that you can put your finger on.
    They make much of the menace presented by the Islamic State and blame Obama for the jihadist group’s conquest of territory in Iraq and Syria. But what do they propose to do differently? Does anybody know?
    If there is a Republican solution to the upheaval in the Middle East, we ought to know about it because Congress should have debated a measure authorizing the use of U.S. military force against the Islamic State. Instead, both houses chose to duck their constitutional responsibility. It’s much easier to complain that Obama is doing everything wrong than to take a stand on the most solemn question our elected officials can possibly face: whether to go to war.
    Incredibly, Republicans have even tried to politicize the response to the Ebola outbreak. This just in: Viruses do not care one whit about party affiliation, with the possible exception of tea party fever.
    I’ve noted in the past that critics yelling “stop the flights” must be unaware that there are no direct flights from the affected countries to the United States. Experts have noted that travel bans and forced quarantines will disproportionately affect returning health workers — and if they are imposed in an uninformed, bullying manner, as New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie attempted to do with nurse Kaci Hickox, they can make it more difficult to contain the epidemic at its source, which is the only way Americans can be safe in the long run.
    During Obama’s time in office, unemployment has fallen dramatically, millions of jobs have been created and the economy is growing. What do Republicans have to say about this record? Instead of acknowledging the obvious — and perhaps explaining how they would build on the president’s success — they change the subject. “We can do better,” they claim, without making the slightest effort to explain how.
    I wish I could say that Democrats have taken the high road by presenting their own fresh ideas. I can’t. Mostly, they threaten voters with scary descriptions of what Republicans would do on social and economic issues if given more power.
    We’re being asked to vote out of resentment and grim duty. So much for what Lincoln called “the better angels of our nature.”
    Read more from Eugene Robinson’s archivefollow him on Twitter orsubscribe to his updates on Facebook. You can also join him Tuesdays at 1 p.m. for a live Q&A.

    The Enforced Quarantine Of Returning Healthcare Volunteers Is Dimwitted Anti-Science

    $
    0
    0
    Kaci Hickox Defies Stay-At-Home Order

    ***

    "Ebola Presents A Trivial Threat To Americans' Health"

    ***

    Maine will take legal action to force Kaci Hickox to stay at home. The nurse -- who has tested negative for Ebola -- went for a bike ride on Thursday. Gov. Paul LePage said he would use his authority to force her to remain under quarantine. Mark Berman and Brady Dennis in The Washington Post

    ***

    "Ebola Presents A Trivial Threat To Americans' Health"
    America is quick to validate paranoia, canonize anti-science stupidity,  and civil rights: The worst of all possible worlds.

    "Quem Deus vult perdere, prius dementat."
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whom_the_gods_would_destroy




    Public Health Authorities Have Authority To Quarantine The Sick But Kaci Hickox Is Well

    $
    0
    0
    Kaci Hickox and Friend

    It's hard to know whether a judge would rule in favor of Hickox, who has retained a lawyer. Public health authorities have wide latitude to quarantine people who might be sick and contagious, but Hickox is healthy. Russell Berman in The Atlantic.

    Alan: An intellectual exercise... Imagine public health authorities ruling handgun carnage a form of contagion and then deciding to quaranntine guns or non-compliant gun owners.

    Hickox's stand will have consequences for health policy nationwide. Officials in other states will be watching closely to see where the courts say their authority begins and ends. In the meantime, the way Maine and New Jersey have treated Hickox since she flew home has been less than encouraging to other American doctors and nurses whose help West Africa urgently needs. Josh Sanburn in Time.

    ***
    ***

    "Ebola Presents A Trivial Threat To Americans' Health"
    America is quick to validate paranoia, canonize anti-science stupidity,  and civil rights: The worst of all possible worlds.

    "Quem Deus vult perdere, prius dementat."
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whom_the_gods_would_destroy

    It Took A Local Pizzeria 20 Hours To Deliver A Pizza To Traci Hickox

    $
    0
    0
    Kaci Hickox And Friend

    A local pizzeria tried to deliver a pizza to Hickox. But it took about 20 hours. The Moose Shack wanted to thank Hickox for her work combating Ebola overseas, but lengthy negotiations with local police preceded the delivery. Sarah Kliff for Vox.

    ***

    "Ebola Presents A Trivial Threat To Americans' Health"
    America is quick to validate paranoia, canonize anti-science stupidity,  and civil rights: The worst of all possible worlds.

    "Quem Deus vult perdere, prius dementat."
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whom_the_gods_would_destroy




    The Taproot Of "Conservative" Degradation: "Being Scared Feels Good," The Economist

    $
    0
    0
    Being scared feels good. Fright releases a set of pleasure-inducing hormones, which is one reason why so many people enjoy watching horror films. The Economist.


    ***


     The hidden face of pornography:
    Conservative pandering to fear is worse than pandering to prostitution.
    Fear is the root of homo sapiens' most intractable evils.


    "There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love."
    1 John 4:18 - New International Version (NIV)





    Despite Supremes' Gutting Of Voting Rights, Texas Is Heading For Federal Supervision

    $
    0
    0
    Rick Perry: Prototypal U.S. Politician
    Are we having fun yet?

    ***

    Texas's voting laws could be put under federal supervision once again. The Supreme Court struck down the part of the Voting Rights Act that automatically put much of the South's voting laws under federal supervision and gave the Department of Justice authority to veto new election laws in advance. The court, however, did not strike down another provision that gives judges the power to place states under this form of supervision if they engage in racial discrimination against voters. The district judge in Texas's most recent voter I.D. case has already laid out plenty of evidence that the state was doing so willfully, and a future hearing could restore the Justice Department's authority over Texas's elections. In other words, "the most important ruling in the case is yet to come." Richard Hasen for Talking Points Memo.



    Citizens United Enhances The Monstrosity

    $
    0
    0

    The so-called "outside groups" created by Citizens United are anything but. Campaigns coordinate openly with outside groups through loopholes in election law. In North Carolina, Thom Tillis's campaign issued a public memo describing in detail the campaign's strategic needs, a common tactic to get around laws barring coordination. In Oregon, one candidate's reported boyfriend ran an outside group on her behalf. Alex Roarty and Shane Goldmacher in National Journal.







    Mississippi Is The One State Where The Uninsurance Rate Has Gone Up

    Income Inequality Is Real, Destructive And Attributable To Unbridled Capitalism. Shhh!

    $
    0
    0

    President Obama has spent the past few weeks reminding voters all over the country that the economy is on the mend. "By almost every economic measure, we are better off today than we were when I took office," he said last month, a tribute to President Reagan's famously effective campaign slogan.

    Obama is right. Home prices are up, stock prices are way up, and businesses keep on hiring. The economy is in the longest period of uninterrupted job growth ever. You might think that Thursday's quarterly report from the Bureau of Economic Analysis would bolster his case further. Gross domestic product grew a reasonable 3.5 percent last quarter, and while there were some worrisome points in the data, things certainly could be much worse.

    If you have to go around telling people that they're better off, though, then you have a problem. Obama's problem is that recent economic growth has largely benefited the very rich, while median incomes and wages have hardly grown. That is, the middle class is actually worse off than when Obama took office. Only 42 percent of Americans approve of his handling of the economy, according to a new poll by The Washington Post-ABC News.
    The reasons that the United States is becoming a less equal country are still being debated, and whatever they are, it's clear Americans are frustrated that they are not broadly enjoying the fruits of economic growth. Obama stopped talking about economic inequality this year, as polling data showed that the topic made people uncomfortable. This is America, after all.

    But as Obama's approval ratings show, very few of us are comfortable with the current environment. Rather, voters are insisting on shared growth, and Obama is not longer openly espousing it. Even if talking too loudly about inequality might not be a winning strategy at the polls, enacting policies that actually reduce it will be. Democrats and Republicans alike should keep that point in mind as they formulate their agenda for the next two years.



    The Borowitz Report: Kochs Approve Plan to Fire Cash from Cannon at Voters

    $
    0
    0

    "Koch Brothers Upset By Rolling Stone Exposé. Their Riposte Backfires"


    ***
    NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report)—The billionaire Koch brothers have approved a controversial plan to shoot cash from cannons directly at voters heading into polling places on Election Day.
    The plan, which Koch insiders have privately referred to as Operation Money Shot, would distribute as much as seventy million dollars in small bills in the hopes of seizing Republican control of the United States Senate next Tuesday.

    While most state laws prohibit electioneering within a hundred feet of polling places, the Koch plan craftily skirts that restriction by using high-powered cash cannons, similar to the T-shirt cannons used in sports arenas, which have a range of up to a hundred and fifty feet.
    According to a spokesman for the Kochs, “Under the law, corporations are considered people, and people have always had the right to fire money from cannons at other people.”
    When news of Operation Money Shot reached Democratic circles several weeks ago, there were howls of protest and threats of a legal challenge, as Democratic leaders complained that firing cash directly at voters about to cast their ballots would be a subversion of the election process.
    But the Supreme Court upheld the Koch brothers’ plan by a five-to-four vote on Thursday, arguing that spending money on elections was protected by the First Amendment, and that using a cannon was protected by the Second.

    Pax On Both Houses: Compendium Of G.K. Chesterton Posts

    $
    0
    0

  • Pax on both houses: Chesterton Quotations... And More

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2012/12/chesterton-quotations.html

    Dec 10, 2012 - Chesterton missed the mark in this chapter because he made ..... a doctor can walk into the house of a free man, whose daughter's hair may be ...
  • Pax on both houses: G.K. Chesterton: The Anarchy Of The ...

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2013/.../gk-chesterton-anarchy-of-rich.h...

    Oct 24, 2013 - G.K. Chesterton: The Anarchy Of The Rich. "The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to ...
  • Pax on both houses: G.K. Chesterton: The Most Insightful ...

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/.../gk-chesterton-most-insightful-thing-h...

    Oct 3, 2013 - G.K. Chesterton: The Most Insightful Thing GKC Ever Said. "The work of heaven alone is material; the making of a material world. The work of ...
  • Pax on both houses: G.K. Chesterton and Warren Buffett's ...

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/.../gk-chesterton-and-warren-buffetts-cla...

    Jan 25, 2012 - "The merely rich are not rich enough to rule the modern market. The things that change modern history, the big national and international loans, ...
  • Pax on both houses: Chesterton: "To get all that money you ...

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/.../chesterton-to-get-all-that-money-you....

    Sep 14, 2013 - "The merely rich are not rich enough to rule the modern market. The things that change modern history, the big national and international loans, ...
  • Pax on both houses: G.K. Chesterton: On Charity, Hope And ...

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/.../chesterton-on-charity-and-universal.h...

    Oct 24, 2013 - Alternatively, G.K. Chesterton embodies such abundance of generosity that he would not wish eternal damnation on anyone. In his greatest ...
  • Pax on both houses: G.K. Chesterton "On Reading"

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/08/gk-chesterton-on-reading.html

    Aug 21, 2014 - The highest use of the great masters of literature is not literary; it is apart from their superb style and even from their emotional inspiration.
  • Pax on both houses: G.K. Chesterton's Call For Constant ...

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/.../gk-chestertons-call-for-constant.html

    Jun 30, 2014 - What is consistently clear is Chesterton's belief in continual revolution and his championship of human agency as the linchpin of incarnating ...
  • Pax on both houses: G.K. Chesterton Reviews Martin ...

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/.../gk-chesterton-reviews-martin-scorsese...

     Rating: 8.8/10 - ‎20,130 votes
    Jan 1, 2014 - What Chesterton does not mention (and perhaps was too populist to admit) is that "everyday people" are naifs, and in their naivete presume ...
  • Pax on both houses: G.K. Chesterton - The Best Single Web ...

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/.../gk-chesterton-best-single-web-source....

    Apr 16, 2012 - The aim of this site is to provide information and resources about one of my favourite authors: Gilbert Keith Chesterton. My aim is to provide a ...
  • Pax on both houses: Gilbert Keith Chesterton - Quotation ...

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/.../gilbert-keith-chesterton-compendium-...

    Dec 30, 2011 - Mysticism keeps men sane. As long as you have mystery you have health; when you destroy mystery you create morbidity. The ordinary man ...
  • "Best Posts" From - Pax on both houses

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/.../best-posts-from-pax-on-both-houses....

    Sep 13, 2014 - http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2013/10/chesterton-on-charity-and- ... Pax On Both Houses: Compendium Of U.S. Prison System Posts.
  • Pax on both houses: "G.K. Chesterton's Universalism" by ...

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/.../gk-chestertons-universalism-by-edwar...

    Feb 27, 2013 - I enjoy Chesterton still, for his lightness and wit. His statement that "Satan fell by force of gravity, by taking himself too gravely," still resonates ...
  • Frog Hospital, Dickens, Chesterton And - Pax on both houses

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/.../frog-hospital-dickens-chesterton-and....

    Jun 15, 2014 - Among Chesterton's best biographies are "Dickens" (whom he argues is, at heart, a Catholic), along with "George Bernard Shaw" and the Irish ...
  • Pax on both houses: Chesterton: "On Education"

    paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2013/01/chesterton-on-education.html

    Jan 31, 2013 - “Every education teaches a philosophy; if not by dogma then by suggestion, by implication, by atmosphere. Every part of that education has a ...
  • Obama Has Improved Every Economic Measure. Citizens Think Everything Is Worse

    $
    0
    0
    American sheep grazing on sound bites.

    Adolf Hitler: "All this was inspired by the principle--which is quite true within itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying." 
    Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X [1]

    By means of shrewd lies, unremittingly repeated, it is possible to make people believe that heaven is hell - and hell heaven...The great masses of people will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one." Adolf Hitler

    "Why of course the people don't want war... Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought along to do the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." Hermann Goering, Adolf Hitler's Deputy Chief and Luftwaffe Commander, at the Nuremberg trials, 1946.

    "War, Peace And Political Manipulation: Quotations"

    Weird Enuf Fer Ya? News From Barbaria #158

    $
    0
    0

    Pax On Both Houses: Compendium Of Voter Fraud And Voter Suppression Posts

    ***
    Jon Stewart shreds ‘robber baron’ Koch brothers for buying ad time during his show

    Ted Cruz: Being gay is Tim Cook’s ‘personal choice,’ but ‘I love my iPhone’

    Berkeley administration overrules students: Bill Maher still invited to speak at commencement

    Teacher told class she’d kill all black people if given 10 days to live: student’s mom

    Only a scientist could fumble so badly the gift Pope Francis just handed science

    She hasn’t changed her mind, but woman may delay decision to die: ‘I still have enough joy’

    Lindsey Graham: White men in ‘male-only clubs’ will do great if I’m president

    Illinois teacher calls Jamaican students ‘n*gger’ after they object to ‘African-American’

    Penn. coroner auctioning firearms from suicides: People pay more for ‘guns that took a life’

    ‘Duck Commander’ reality star endorses nephew for Congress: ‘Bibles and guns brought us here’

    Former Ohio state trooper admits to coercing sex from handcuffed women

    Giant Steps: How Robotic Lower Limbs Are Revolutionizing Life For Amputees

    $
    0
    0


    "Since God Doesn't Heal Amputees, Humankind Will. The Future Of Christian Theology"
    http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/07/since-god-cant-heal-amputees-mankind.html

    Is This the Future of Robotic Legs?

    Hugh Herr’s bionic limbs have already revolutionized life for amputees (including himself). Now he’s envisioning new capabilities for everyone else

    SMITHSONIAN MAGAZINE |

    At 5 o’clock on a blistering morning in June 2007, U.S. Marine Cpl. William Gadsby helped lead a team of infantrymen into the farmland surrounding Karma, an agricultural hub in Iraq’s volatile Anbar Province. Karma is pancake-flat, with sightlines for miles, and after a few hours on patrol, Gadsby grew worried. We’ve been out here too long, he thought. They’re probably tracking us.
    Around 10 a.m., he heard a deafening bang. A cloud of smoke enveloped him. He tried to run and he got nowhere: A remotely detonated bomb had turned his right leg into a mass of gore and gristle. All he felt was adrenaline. Ears ringing, he rolled and jerked away from the site of the explosion until he reached the side of the road. As he lay in the dirt, with a corpsman applying a tourniquet to his right leg, a sniper’s bullet pulverized his left knee.
    More bullets zipped past. Gadsby hollered out orders, even as liters of blood poured out of his body. Once the insurgents had fled back into the farmland, his men flagged down a passing truck and loaded him into the back. His breathing was ragged and dry, and he flickered into and out of consciousness. At the field hospital, a priest read him his last rites. His eyes closed.
    He awoke a day and a half later in the medical wing of a base in Germany. Miraculously, a trauma surgeon had preserved his left leg—but the right had been sawed off above the knee.
    Months of pain followed: the endless physical therapy, the fitting of a prosthetic, the challenge of learning to walk again. Gadsby, 29 years old, faced it all head-on. After he was transferred to a base in Southern California, he took to spending his afternoons hobbling up and down the beach, because walking in sand took real effort, and he thought it would speed his recovery.

    Video: Ingenuity Awards, Hugh Herr


    It didn’t. Part of the problem was his prosthesis. It was a foot made from carbon fiber—top of the line, his doctors had assured him—and although it had some flex to it, the device still felt overly stiff. Every step sent a shock wave up his back. He was always sore.
    “I thought, I live in an era where the technology is only expanding—every year, there’s a revolutionary breakthrough,” Gadsby, now a husband and father and social-worker-in-training, told me recently. “That gave me hope. Something to go on.”
    In the spring of 2010, he read about a new type of prosthesis being developed by Hugh Herr, head of the biomechatronics group at MIT’s Media Lab. Herr himself was a double amputee: In 1982, when he was just 17, he’d lost both legs to frostbite sustained during a mountaineering expedition. While completing a master’s degree in mechanical engineering at MIT, a doctorate in biophysics at Harvard and postdoctoral work in biomechatronics at MIT, Herr had developed an increasingly sophisticated array of artificial knees, feet and ankles. His latest invention was a fully computerized ankle-foot system called the BiOM, which imitated a flesh-and-blood foot, propelling the user forward with each step. It bore no resemblance to any other prosthesis on the market.
    “To me, this guy, Dr. Herr, was an inspiration,” Gadsby says. “Unlike the rest of us, he wasn’t sitting around, thinking, ‘Gee, I wish they could come up with a better gadget.’ He got those degrees so he could fix himself—and fix everyone else.”
    ***




    Herr’s BiOM (in an X-ray view), a fully computerized ankle-foot system, bore no resemblance to any other prothesis. (David Arky)



    For the past four years, the 30-odd members of the Media Lab’s biomechatronics group have worked out of a laboratory on the second floor of a gleaming glass complex on Amherst Street in Cambridge, not far from the Charles River. The space is high-ceilinged and bright, and dominated by a treadmill, which is used to test prostheses and exoskeletal devices. Amid the sleek fiberglass struts and polished machine parts, one object stands out: a flesh-colored rubber appendage known as a Jaipur Foot. Its presence in the lab is talismanic, commemorative. Until relatively recently, the Jaipur Foot, invented in 1971 by an Indian surgeon, represented the pinnacle of prosthetic science: an inanimate lump that aped the form of a foot without replicating its function.
    “Wood, rubber, plastics,” Hugh Herr recited when I visited him in Cambridge earlier this year. “At the time of my accident, that was the reality. There were foot-ankle systems, but there was no computational intelligence. And a lot of key technological capabilities were not in place, like inexpensive, powerful, small microprocessors. A lot of sensing capability was not available. The same went for power supplies and motors.”
    In person, Herr, 51, has a raffish air—more Parisian artist than hard-charging American scientist. He wears his thick hair swept back and favors dark blazers and colorful scarves. (In a shoot for an Italian edition of Wired magazine, he posed in a bespoke jumpsuit of fine linen; a blowup of the cover hangs prominently in the MIT lab.) But the impression is deceptive. Herr has confessed to being “stoic to a fault,” and when faced with questions he regards as trivial or uninteresting, he has a habit of going monosyllabic. “I just don’t express what’s inside,” Herr has been quoted as saying. “My students tend to be afraid of me, and I wish they weren’t.”
    Partly, the stoicism may be a response to life in the spotlight. Even before he lost his legs, Herr was a sensation in the rock-climbing world—a handsome kid from a Mennonite farm in Pennsylvania putting up wild and hairy routes that even hardened veterans had trouble replicating. His accident, the result of a botched winter ascent of New Hampshire’s Mount Washington, slowed him down for a few months, but soon he was climbing again, using prosthetics he designed in his own workshop. And something strange was happening: His climbing was improving. He had flexible rubber feet that helped him scuttle up tricky cracks, and specialized crampons for scaling ice walls. Again, the media came calling—magazines, newspapers, TV.
    At the same time, he continually ran into evidence of a prejudice against people like him. “My father told me this story about how, shortly after my limbs were amputated, a person came up to him in the hospital and said, ‘Oh, I’m so sorry. He wasn’t married, was he?’ I had become instantly subhuman!” Herr marveled. “It was fascinating. We’re all so programmed to think that an unusual body is a weak one.”
    He was determined to change that. A middling high-school student, he now consumed mathematics textbooks by the crateload. In his early 20s, he enrolled at Millersville University, a small school a few miles from the family farm in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. While an undergraduate, he obtained his first patent, for a prosthetic sock that leveraged a system of inflatable bladders and microprocessors to help the wearer walk better and more comfortably. The device—along with a sterling grade-point average—caught the attention of MIT’s admissions staff, and in the early 1990s Herr moved to Cambridge to work on his master’s degree. He invented ceaselessly, always tinkering, building, improving. The patents piled up: for artificial joints, computer-powered ankles, biomimetic joint actuators.
    The prosthetics industry had seemed trapped in another century, and Herr wanted to haul it into the digital age. “There was a long stretch of time where there was a lot of technological advancement in other sectors, but not in our field,” Elliot Weintrob, a Virginia prosthetist who sells BiOM devices, told me. “Yes, you had the emergence of carbon fiber, but the improvements were incremental: Lighter carbon fiber, stronger carbon fiber. OK, what’s the next level? The next level was power. Because no matter how much spring you’ve got in that carbon fiber, until you start trying to replace the action of the muscle, you’re inherently limited. That was Hugh Herr’s genius—he understood that.”

    Video: "The New Bounce"


    In 2007, Herr founded a bionics company called iWalk (the name was later changed to BiOM), and set about bringing to life the advanced technology that had always fascinated him. Research and development in prosthetics had not been particularly well funded or attractive to engineers and scientists, but things were rapidly changing. “With the war on terror, and the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, and all these returning injured, Congress had unleashed millions in research money,” Herr recalled. “Another driver was that the key disciplines relevant to bionics had matured, from robotics to tissue engineering. And they were maturing to a level where we could actually build bionics as envisioned by Hollywood and science-fiction writers.”
    Herr trained his focus on the ankle, a dauntingly complex part of human anatomy, and one traditionally underserved by prosthetics technology. By late 2009, testing was underway on the PowerFoot BiOM, the first lower-leg system to use robotics to replace muscle and tendon function. Using onboard microprocessors and a three-cell ion lithium battery, the device actually propelled the user forward with each step, in the manner of organic muscle. For propulsion, the BiOM relied on a custom-built carbon-fiber spring—each time the user stepped down on the device, the spring was loaded with potential energy. On the up-step, that energy was supplemented with a small battery-powered motor.
    But Herr and his team knew that all steps are not created equal: Scrambling up a steep slope requires a very different gait—and very different parts of the body—from walking across a tennis court. So they developed a proprietary algorithm that measured the angle and speed of the initial heel strike of the BiOM, and controlled, via the microprocessors, the speed and angle of descent on the next step.
    The BiOM weighed about five pounds—more or less the weight of a human ankle and foot—and was fitted to the user’s residual limb with a simple carbon fiber socket. Tests indicated that the device returned about 200 percent of the body’s downward energy. A top-flight carbon-fiber prosthetic returned only 90 percent.
    Tens of millions of dollars in venture capital poured in. Ditto for emails and letters from amputees desperately eager to serve as BiOM guinea pigs. That barrage has not stopped. “It’s overwhelming,” Herr told me, shaking his head. “It’s emotionally taxing and heartbreaking.”
    These days, Herr is something of a professional juggler: In addition to his posts at BiOM and the biomechatronics lab, he teaches classes at MIT and Harvard. He travels to lecture and to consult on other bionics projects. He still climbs when he can, although in recent years, the highest-profile mountaineer in the family has been his wife, Patricia Ellis Herr, whose 2012 book, Up: A Mother and Daughter’s Peakbagging Adventure, details a family quest to summit the 48 highest mountains in New Hampshire. The Herrs’ daughters, Alex, 11, and Sage, 9, are both avid climbers. Hugh joins them on hikes when he can but spends a large part of his waking life in the lab.
    Before I left MIT, I asked Herr if he was comfortable with the roles he had assumed as an outspoken advocate for bionics and a very visible bionic man himself. He paused. “We’re constantly surrounded by messages about how technology is not doing us well: pollution and nuclear weapons and so on,” he said, finally, studying his legs. “I’m an example of the opposite trend. So, yes, I’m comfortable with it. God, yes.”
    ***
    This past March, Herr flew to Vancouver to deliver an address at the TED Conference, the annual summit of science and tech cognoscenti. His presentation was heavily autobiographical: He discussed his accident, his first inventions and a pair of early prosthetics that allowed him to adjust his height from 5 feet to 6 1⁄2 feet plus. (“When I was feeling badly about myself, insecure, I would jack my height up,” he joked, “but when I was feeling confident and suave, I would knock my height down a notch, just to give the competition a chance.”)
    Then the lights dimmed and went up again, and Herr introduced a professional ballroom dancer named Adrianne Haslet-Davis. In 2013, Haslet-Davis had lost part of her left leg when terrorists detonated a pair of bombs at the Boston Marathon; now, as the crowd sat rapt, she and her dancing partner, Christian Lightner, performed a delicate rumba. If you hadn’t spotted the glint of the prosthesis Herr had fitted her with, you would have been hard-pressed to know Haslet-Davis had ever been injured—her footwork was dazzlingly precise, meticulous, elegant.
    The performance—a video of which has been viewed more than 2.5 million times online—was a testament to the healing power of high technology. It was also a high-profile showcase for the BiOM T2, the successor to the iWalk BiOM. The T2 uses the same basic architecture and algorithms as the original device, but the battery is lighter and longer-lasting and the motor more reliable. This fall, BiOM will release an Android application that will allow users to monitor steps and battery life and maintain some control over the propulsion levels. “If you’re just sitting in the office, you might dial it down a bit,” Charles S. Carignan, BiOM’s CEO, told me. “But let’s say you want to go out and climb a few steep hills. Well, then you’d probably want some extra power.”
    BiOM says it has distributed more than 900 BiOM ankle systems, with nearly half going to veterans such as William Gadsby. Paul Pasquina, a colonel in the Army Medical Corps and chief of the Integrated Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, calls the technology “revolutionary.” Non-powered prostheses, he said, cannot mimic the natural gait, and users try to compensate with other muscle groups. That can lead to pain, degeneration, osteoarthritis and severe musculoskeletal and cognitive stress. Bionics, Pasquina said, can, when combined with aggressive rehabilitation, better compensate for a lost limb and improve balance and function. “The more you’re able to simulate natural human motion, the better for the individual,” Pasquina said. “In that sense, I believe, the technology speaks for itself.”
    But a BiOM T2 lists for about $40,000, and Herr has had trouble stirring up the same enthusiasm among civilian insurers. Last year, he and several of his patients testified in front of Congressional panels to persuade Medicare administrators to provide bionic limbs for amputees. In part, their argument centered on the preventive benefits of a BiOM. Sure, the device is expensive. But isn’t the cost justified if it saves insurers money on painkillers, osteoarthritis treatments and other measures needed to treat the side effects of traditional prostheses? Ultimately, a Medicare code was issued; a handful of workers’ compensation providers have also agreed to pay for the BiOM. Still, wider acceptance by the insurance industry remains elusive.
    David Conrod, a communications professional who lost his leg decades ago in an industrial accident in Canada, was one of the patients to testify with Herr. His BiOM system is paid for by a workers’ compensation plan, but he said he expects that more health insurers will come around to the idea of bionic prosthetics. “People default to what they know, and they don’t know bionics yet,” he said. “There aren’t millions of people on these products. But I think this is such a value-add for amputees...that it will become common. Many, many people will wear legs like mine.”
    ***
    And yet to spend any time with Hugh Herr is to understand that he is already thinking beyond a world where bionics are used only to enable wounded people and toward a future where bionics are an integral part of everyday life. In less than 20 years, he told me, “it will be common to step outside and see someone wearing a robot, meaning a bionic of some kind.”
    One afternoon at the biomechatronics lab, I watched a group of Herr’s doctoral students test an exoskeletal leg brace on the treadmill. The device, constructed from fiberglass struts, is intended to supplement the wearer’s capability—a construction worker might don one to lift a heavy load, or a Marine might wear one to walk an extra 50 miles with a pack on her back. Lately, the lab has become a veritable factory of similarly high-end bionics, from robotic limbs that can “read” the ground ahead and adjust power input and angle accordingly, to the pieces of a fully autonomous exoskeleton—an invention Herr and his team unveiled earlier this year to much fanfare in the Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.
    “When you view the human being in terms of its locomotory function, some aspects are quite impressive,” Herr said. “Our limbs are very versatile: We can go over very rough terrain, we can dance, we can stand still. But...our muscles, when they do positive work, 75 percent is thrown out as heat and only a quarter is mechanical work. So we’re pretty inefficient, we’re pretty slow and we’re not terribly strong. These are weaknesses we can fix.”
    The next frontier for bionics, Herr believes, is neurally controlled devices. For now, the BiOM works independently from the brain, with an algorithm and a processor governing the prosthetic’s movement. But Herr is working on sensors that can tap into the body’s nervous system—eventually we could see a prosthetic controlled by the brain, muscles and nerves.
    Of course, as Herr is quick to acknowledge, it is impossible to think of the mating of flesh and robotics without thinking of the dystopian fiction of Philip K. Dick or movies like the Transformers series, where machines have eclipsed humanity. “The fear is that the mating will be such that the human, however that’s defined, is no longer in control,” he allowed. Herr recently presided over the founding of the Center for Extreme Bionics at MIT, which will explore more experimental forms of robotic engineering. As part of the center’s activity, he hopes to convene a group of lawyers, scientists and philosophers to help guide “policy around augmentation.”
    “We’re going to advance technologies in this century that just fundamentally change human capability,” he told me. “And there’s real beauty in that—there’s real advantage to humanity in that you can eradicate disability. There’s also real risk, so we need to develop policy commensurate with these new technologies. And in my view the drivers of policy around augmentation technology should focus on enhancing human diversity.”
    Eventually, he suggested, prosthetics could become a lifestyle choice, like a nose piercing or a tattoo—“where our bodies are an art form and we can just create any type of body. Then we see a death of normalcy, a death of standard views of human beauty. Then you walk down the street 50 years from now and it’s like the cantina scene in Star Wars. That’s what I want.”
    ***
    On a humid day this summer, I met William Gadsby at a restaurant in Northern Virginia, where he now lives with his wife, Tatiana, who is a computer programmer, and their 5-year-old son. Four years ago, after much lobbying, Gadsby received approval from the Veterans Administration to join an early BiOM testing program for above-the-knee, or transfemoral, amputees. (The device had been used for below-the-knee amputees because the diminished gait of transfemoral amputees is significantly more difficult to compensate for.) Running a hand through his close-cropped blond hair, Gadsby recalled reporting to his prosthetist’s office for the fitting—a lengthy process where the BiOM’s firmware is synced to the user’s gait.
    “I don’t think most ‘organic’ people, as I refer to them, understand the energy return they get from their feet,” Gadsby said. “But when you’re on that carbon-fiber foot...you’re using upwards of 100 percent more energy just to get around, and man, it hurts. It does. With the BiOM, it felt like I was going from using a bicycle to a Ferrari. I was getting energy return. I was getting propulsion. It felt real.”
    I followed him out to the parking lot. Gadsby fished his carbon-fiber foot out of his backpack for me to hold. It was light, but when he told me to smack the sole against my palm, I saw what he meant—there wasn’t much give. “Now watch this,” he said, and took off across the pavement at an impressive clip, the BiOM pistoning away underneath him. He returned grinning.
    “Now I can hike,” he said. “I can drive all the way to Florida. I can cart a bunch of heavy suitcases when we go on vacation. I can throw my son on my shoulders and walk around with him. I can be a dad. The bottom line is that I’ve always tried to make sure my wounds aren’t my family’s wounds. The BiOM allows me to do that.”


    Repealing And Replacing Obamacare Was The GOP's #1 Priority. But Not Now

    $
    0
    0

    "Obamacare: Where's The Train Wreck?"
    Since "repealing and replacing" Obamacare has been the GOP's #1 legislative priority for four years -- and has now disappeared from radar as completely as the missing Malaysian airliner -- the chances Republicans will come up with a legislative agenda that is any more enduring or meaningful are nil to nilisimo.

    The Party of Lincoln is no longer The Party of Lincoln.

    The Party of Teddy Roosevelt is no longer The Party of Teddy Roosevelt.

    The Party of Dwight Eisenhower is no longer The Party of Dwight Eisenhower.

    And truth be told, The Party of Ronald Reagan is no longer The Party of Ronald Reagan.

    Instead, the GOP has become an intellectually bankrupt Party of Angry White Guys waging Civil War with itself.

    If Republicans win the senate next Tuesday, the GOP's unique combination of senescence, ineptitude, vapidity and treachery will ensure that by 2016 the Democrats will sweep The White House and both houses of congress, going on to name enough Supreme Court judges to to topple the ancien regime


    Jindal Criticizes The Stupid Party: "Simply protects the rich so they get to keep their toys"

    "American Conservatives And Oppositional-Defiant Disorder"

    "Republicans For Revolution," A Study In Anarchic Apocalypticism

    Bill Maher: The Zombie Life Cycle Of Republican Lies. They Never - Ever - Die

    "Conservatives Scare More Easily Than Liberals"


    GOP Treatment Of Obamacare Will Reveal Its Inescapable Commitment To Disaster

    $
    0
    0
    Nothing but an "individual mandate" (or single payer healthcare) circumvents denial-of-care for a pre-existing condition.

    So a GOP Senate majority will target Obamacare? Uh, okay.

     October 31, 2014 


    Obamacare is back in the news again. Mitch McConnell is now claiming a GOP Senate majority will use the tool known as “reconciliation” to target the health law with simple majority votes. McConnell had previously suggested he wouldn’t go that route, sparking conservative cries of “surrender” that forced him to reverse course. Which makes this a preview of what to expect when conservatives demand maximum confrontation from the new GOP majority.
    Meanwhile, the Supreme Court today is privately deliberating whether to hear a major court challenge to the law’s subsidies. Jonathan Cohn has everything you need to know about how likely that is to happen, and as he points out, the courts are more likely to do real damage to the law than anything the Senate does.
    But even if Obama will veto anything a GOP Senate passes, it does look like a new GOP majority will try to go after the law. To be sure, it’s always possible this is just Mitch McConnell blustering to the base. But even so, conservatives will claim the GOP won all because the public rose up en mass against Obummercare, and will exert intense pressure on the new majority to keep up the repeal crusade until the end of time. That won’t be at all what the elections mean, but there will be a tremendous push to sell this interpretation. Indeed, the war over the meaning of the elections will feed into how far a new GOP Senate majority will go against Obamacare.
    One former longtime Senate parliamentarian said a majority leader could make a persuasive case for using reconciliation to repeal core components of Obamacare, many of which have budgetary impacts. That includes the premium tax credits that help lower-income Americans buy insurance. It might even include the individual mandate, given that the Congressional Budget Office has said scrapping the mandate would save money…
    That sets up tension between the GOP’s establishment wing and the tea party wing…The big question is how far Republican leaders are willing to go, and whether they find the votes in the Senate and House to pass an anti-Obamacare bill and put it on Obama’s desk.
    There will probably also be other varieties of repeal votes, too. So here’s my question: Is this really something that Republican Senators who are up for reelection in 2016 in blue and purple states are going to want?
    With just days to go before voters cast their ballots in the high stakes midterm elections, control of the Senate hangs on just a few states, and the GOP is feeling optimistic that both houses of Congress may soon be back under its control. (AP)
    The Senate map is dramatically different next cycle than it was this time. AsEd Kilgore notes, in 2016, Republicans are defending far more seats than Democrats are, in a number of states Obama won twice.
    “Voting to repeal Obamacare outright, without a replacement, is a vote that a lot of Republicans who are up for reelection in states carried by Obama will not want to take,” Jennifer Duffy, who tracks Senate races for the Cook Political Report, tells me. “They will fight having to take it. In some of these states, Obamacare has been successful, and the longer it’s in place, the more they’ll work the kinks out.”
    Duffy cited as examples Kelly Ayotte in New Hampshire, Rob Portman in Ohio, and Mark Kirk in Illinois. There’s also Pat Toomey in Pennsylvania.
    Even now, in a national environment that heavily favors Republicans, the politics of Obamacare are already murky for Republicans. In New Hampshire, Senate candidate Scott Brown resorts to all sorts of rhetorical buffoonery to avoid saying what would happen to all those benefiting from the law there. The Medicaid expansion is moving forward in New Hampshire, and also in Ohio, where Governor John Kasich (who embraced the expansion) recently admitted the law is helping a lot of people. In Pennsylvania, Governor Tom Corbett finally agreed to implement the state’s version of the Medicaid expansion (though he’s still toast for reelection), which means untold numbers there will be covered soon enough.
    Even in southern states, amid a midterm electorate, Republicans like Mitch McConnell in Kentucky and Tom Cotton in Arkansas have fudged and evaded endlessly on whether they would really take the law’s benefits away from their state’s residents. Next year we’ll be talking about blue and purple states amid a presidential year electorate. So, yes, maybe the new GOP Senate majority will keep up the repeal crusade. How that goes over with Republican Senators in those states will tell us something about how the politics of Obamacare will really be playing nationally as we head into the next elections.
    **********************************************
    UPDATE: To be clear, if Republicans do targeted votes aimed at unpopular provisions of the law, such as the individual mandate, that could put some Democrats in a tough spot. (Obama would veto anything that seriously threatens the law.) But conservatives will presumably want the push for full repeal to continue, and votes for full repeal or votes targeting the coverage expansion might be tough for some Republicans up in 2016.


    Greg Sargent writes The Plum Line blog, a reported opinion blog with a liberal slant -- what you might call “opinionated reporting” from the left.

    Blind Ultra-Marathoner Running From Boston To NYC Before Competing In Marathon

    $
    0
    0

    Meet the blind ultra-marathoner who’s running from Boston to New York before competing in the TCS New York City Marathon this Sunday. How’s that for inspiration?


    Why fly or drive from Boston to New York City when you can run? That was long-distance runner Simon Wheatcroft’s thinking when planning his journey from one city to the other. He’s been blessed with two working legs and he was going to use them.
    The reason this Doncaster, England, native is running to NYC in the first place is to participate in the TCS New York City Marathon this Sunday. He will run about 220 miles through four states over the course of nine days before winding down with a nice 26.2-mile stroll through New York City. But he’s not worried about accomplishing all of this because running is something he can do with his eyes closed. Literally. Simon Wheatcroft was diagnosed legally blind at the age of 17.
    When I was given the opportunity to speak with Wheatcroft, I thought it’d be a conversation consisting of a sad story peppered with inspirational quotes—understandably so—but within a minute of the interview, I realized Wheatcroft does not view his life as a made-for-TV movie. He talked about his training as if he were talking about the weather; he has no idea how impressive he is, which just makes him more impressive.
    Wheatcroft was born with a genetic degenerative eye condition, retinitis pigmentosa, and now at the age of 32 his vision has almost completely deteriorated, leaving him unable to see the road in front of him. But that hasn’t stopped him from running on it. In fact, his loss of vision is what made him run in the first place.
    “I wasn’t a runner before I lost my vision, and I probably never would have started running if I didn’t lose it,” Wheatcroft casually told me. “Once I lost my vision, I had to rethink my career and with that, career change; I went back to school and found myself with more time on my hands.”
    Getting frustrated with his constraints and bored with his limited lifestyle, he decided to put on some sneakers and see if he could run. And he could. “Running gave me a sense of independence because while there are many parts of my life where I have to rely on others, running is something I can actually do alone.”

    141030-parker-marathon2-embed

    Seven months after he started running, he was ready for his first race. As he was already running long distances at that point, he felt like a marathon wouldn’t be enough of a challenge, so he signed up for an ultramarathon and completed 83 miles. No big deal.
    “I don’t think it’s any more difficult for me physically because I’m blind,” he said, “it’s just putting one foot in front of the other over and over again so fitness-wise, I’m on the same playing field as everyone else.”
    OK, that makes sense, but how does he avoid injury and track his run if he can’t watch where he’s going? Wheatcroft uses the app RunKeeper, which reads aloud distance and pace information. When he first used the app to run one particular route, he noticed that he recognized the feel of each step, and with that he memorized his first run. Think about it: If you wake up in the middle of the night to use the bathroom, you can successfully walk there in the dark because you know your route that well. It was the same for Wheatcroft. However, becoming familiar with any route doesn’t happen overnight and it took Wheatcroft a long time to memorize just three miles. Unfortunately, he does not have the time to memorize every course he wants to run, so for longer distances he relies on running guides.
    A seasoned ultramarathoner like Wheatcroft is pretty much always marathon-ready (aren’t we all?). But since this will be the longest distance he’s ever run in a multi-day race, he spent 15 weeks training specifically for his Boston-to-New York adventure. “I’d run back-to-back half marathons, five to six days a week,” he explained. Throughout this trip, he’s been running around 25 miles per day, and tweeting his route out to his followers beforehand to see if any locals want to come out and guide him for a bit. “It’s incredible the kindness of strangers,” he said. “All I have to do to get guides is tweet, and they show up.” The best guides he’s had so far were the members of a high-school track team. “They were so excited to be there, and then the entire school came out to cheer,” he shares. “It’s moments like that which make this adventure so memorable. I can run another race, but I will never get another moment like that.”
    While running does give him a sense of independence, it’s not why he runs long-distance races. He likes the company. “How often do you get six or seven hours a day to just run and chat with new friends?” he said. Not often, Simon, not often at all. “I don’t run to send one big inspiring message, I just want to meet lots of people and share moments in their lives,” he expresses, humbly unaware of the impact he has on everyone he comes into contact with. It doesn’t surprise us that he’s chosen to also rely on the kindness of strangers to get some rest every night – come on, you didn’t think he was running nine days straight, did you?! He’s using Airbnb to secure housing in every town he’s stopping in because he loves meeting locals and getting an insider experience in the towns he’s running through.(Disclosure note: Airbnb facilitated the interview between the author of this piece and Simon Wheatcroft).
    In fact, one of the reasons he wants to run the New York City Marathon is to be amongst people who have similar interests. He plans to make new friends and share his story with anyone who will listen. I have a feeling he’ll have a captive audience. “I don’t run to send one big inspiring message,” he told me. “I just want to meet lots of people and share moments in their lives.”



    Correct Me If I'm Wrong But I Don't Think Democrats Wallow In This Sort Of Slime

    $
    0
    0
    GOP SOP
    Devious slime buckets.
    Not only is it permissible to win by cheating. 
    It's admirable.
    Similarly, arguments are deemed winnable by clamor, 
    not Reason and Truth.

    ***

    Pax On Both Houses: Compendium Of Voter Fraud And Voter Suppression Posts

    ***

    Grimes campaign sues state GOP over mailings

    October 31, 2014

    LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes' Senate campaign has filed a lawsuit accusing the Kentucky Republican Partyof sending flyers aimed at suppressing voter turnout Tuesday.
    The suit filed Friday in Franklin Circuit Court requests an injunction to block further distribution of the flyers.
    Grimes' campaign says it will ask authorities to investigate whether the flyers circulated in several counties violated Kentucky and federal laws.
    The mailer is labeled as an "Election Violation Notice" and warns recipients they're at risk of "acting on fraudulent information." It says Grimes has tried to deceive voters in her campaign to unseat Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.
    Grimes campaign manager Jonathan Hurst calls it an attempt to keep people away from the polls.
    State GOP spokeswoman Kelsey Cooper says the flyers hold Grimes accountable for her "blatant falsehoods."
    Viewing all 30150 articles
    Browse latest View live