↧
Bill Maher Has A Problem With Religion
↧
Map Of The United States. Space (And Time) Are Not What We Think They Are
↧
↧
George Carlin On "American Exceptionalism"
Favorite George Carlin Shticks
↧
Pope Francis: What Christianity Looks Like When Believers Realize "God Is Love"
Alan: There are two dogs in this fight.
One is convinced that scripture, doctrine and tradition are supreme.
The other is convinced that acts of love arising from mercy, compassion and forgiveness are supreme.
I suppose most people find themselves in one camp or the other as a result of genetics, conditioning, "cultural momentum" and perceived fidelity to "common sense."
I understand why people put love, mercy and compassion first.
After all, embodied acts of love are self-evidently good.
But I do not understand the "other camp" which believes in the supremacy of scripture, doctrine and tradition. All these "things" are human constructs with roots no deeper than the onset of Judeo-Christianity 3500 years ago.
I say to myself:
Perhaps the people who believe in primacy of The Word -- rather than primacy of The Word Made Flesh -- have never asked themselves, "Why do I believe that The Word is superior to The Incarnation of Love?"
At minimum, those who reside in "The Word Camp" might admit a kind of dynamic equilibrium with certain people leaning in one direction and the rest in the other.
Instead, people who value The Abstract Word more than The Incarnation of Love appear to be under compulsion.
Their worlds would seemingly fall apart if they were not absolutely invested in Scripture - and the other documents which ostensibly derive from Scripture.
Revealingly, this absolute need to champion "The One and Only Truth" does not apply "the other way around."
Rather, those who love The Incarnation even more than The Word are typically eager for embrace the heterodox as well as the orthodox.
Those who ultimately believe in The Word are almost always eager for huge swathes of humankind to spend eternity in a lake of unquenchable fire.
Islam? God damn them all!
The relative roles of punitive justice and forgiving mercy correspond neatly to the "two camps."
Punishment is foundational to those who value The Word, whereas indulgent mercy is cornerstone for those who value The Incarnation of The Word --- "The Word made Flesh."
Rather, those who love The Incarnation even more than The Word are typically eager for embrace the heterodox as well as the orthodox.
Those who ultimately believe in The Word are almost always eager for huge swathes of humankind to spend eternity in a lake of unquenchable fire.
Islam? God damn them all!
The relative roles of punitive justice and forgiving mercy correspond neatly to the "two camps."
Punishment is foundational to those who value The Word, whereas indulgent mercy is cornerstone for those who value The Incarnation of The Word --- "The Word made Flesh."
"There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love."
1 John 4:18
Notably, those who believe in the primacy of Love Incarnate -- Love Enfleshed -- have no trouble with people who devote their lives to Texts and other manifestations of The Word.
However, the fact that this is not a "two-way" street leaves me with the distinct impression that rigid textualists are subtly (but colossally) egotistical people, determined to protect their man-made systems even though the cause of Love is damaged by that very determination.
My Correspondence With A Christian Fundamentalist: "The Best... Becomes Evil"
Enter Pope Francis...
"Aquinas, St. Symeon The New Theologian And Their Spiritual Kin"
In the 9th chapter of Mark's Gospel (the oldest to the four canonical gospels) is an episode that occurs shortly after the apostles discover their inability to cast out a demon.
Pondering their impotence, Jesus assures his disciples: “He who is not against you, is for you.”
Mark 9 37-39
37 John answered him, saying: Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name, who followeth not us, and we forbade him.
38 But Jesus said: Do not forbid him. For there is no man that doth a miracle in my name, and can soon speak ill of me.
39 For he that is not against you, is for you.
When Jesus' Nature as The Embodiment of Love is viewed against the Gospel assurance that “God is Love,” the practice of Christianity is no longer constrained by doctrinal orthodoxy even though orthodox practice is a Great Good for millions of practitioners.
To identify Jesus as Embodied Love recognizes that the nature of Christ is realized in every human being who embodies love, however imperfectly.
"The terrible thing about our time is precisely the ease with which theories can be put into practice. The more perfect, the more idealistic the theories, the more dreadful is their realization. We are at last beginning to rediscover what perhaps men knew better in very ancient times, in primitive times before utopias were thought of: that liberty is bound up with imperfection, and that limitations, imperfections, errors are not only unavoidable but also salutary. The best is not the ideal. Where what is theoretically best is imposed on everyone as the norm, then there is no longer any room even to be good. The best, imposed as a norm, becomes evil.”
"Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander,” by Trappist monk, Father Thomas Merton
More Merton Quotes
When rigid sectarians ponder the identification of Jesus with Embodied Love, they double down on their determination to “play church” - like students who never “grow in understanding” but get quite good at “playing school” where they consistently score at "the top of their class."
“”He's not playing by the rules!” the punctilious gripe. “He's not even on our team?”
God-Love is not concerned with the exclusivity of “teams” any more than Peace is concerned with the deadly antagonism between Crips and Bloods (or c rusaders and jihadists).
Yeshua Excoriates Fellow Pharisees: "The Woe Passages"
The profoundest truths are paradoxical.
Among these paradoxes is the exquisitely inconvenient truth that belligerent sectarianism is an affront to "God who is Love” and whose Son taught us to “Love our enemies, to do good to those who persecute us.”
On this glorious Blue Marble where prophets have foretold the "coming of the kingdom," God-Love is only concerned with the ongoing Incarnation and the actual works of mercy, forgiveness and compassion that build up "the kingdom."
If The Texts help, great!
If they don't, they weren't needed.
If they don't, they weren't needed.
"The Pharisees saw this and asked his disciples, “Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?”
When Jesus heard that, he said, “Healthy people don’t need a physician, but sick people do.
Go and learn what this means: ‘I want mercy and not sacrifice,’ because I did not come to call righteous people, but sinners.”
When Jesus heard that, he said, “Healthy people don’t need a physician, but sick people do.
Go and learn what this means: ‘I want mercy and not sacrifice,’ because I did not come to call righteous people, but sinners.”
Matthew 9:11-13
"Who Were The Tax Collectors And Shepherds In Jesus' Time"
"Do You Know What You're Doing To Me?"
Jesus of Nazareth
As the great Jesuit Paul Byron homilized (from the altar of my North Carolina parish): “I have no doubt that our Buddhist brothers and sisters are doing the work of Christ.”
Paul understood Tertullian well: "The soul is by nature Christian."
"The Soul Is By Nature Christian." "Anima naturaliter christiana." Tertullian
Similarly, it is not necessary to have conscious knowledge of our Christian Nature in order to participate in that Nature - to “be what we are” whenever we align with the spirit of “I Am Who Am.” https://www.biblegateway. com/passage/?search=Exodus+3% 3A14&version=KJV
Since “the soul is by nature Christian,” participation in our existential nature is – to a greater or lesser extent – inherent.
Often, goodness is an effusion of what is deepest in our nature, independent of sectarian affiliation. (And just as often, sectarian affiliation obstructs what is deepest in our nature.)
Often, goodness is an effusion of what is deepest in our nature, independent of sectarian affiliation. (And just as often, sectarian affiliation obstructs what is deepest in our nature.)
The innate impulse of human Love – and the Universal (katholikos) Love that subtends it – are “baked in the cake.” http://www.etymonline. com/index.php?term=catholic
Love is not only dispensed “top-down” but rises “bottom up.”
It is perhaps fair to say that Love rises from below "the bottom up."
Indeed, given the inherent confusion of spatial “direction,” “top-down” may be “bottom up.”
Indeed, given the inherent confusion of spatial “direction,” “top-down” may be “bottom up.”
What's Up? Seriously. What On Earth?!?
Although humans can either “stumble upon” or “consciously access” their Christian Nature, participation in the fullness of Being always coincides with “perspective and proportion" whether these inter-related qualities manifest spontaneously or by deliberation.
Aquinas observed that “perspective and proportion” are fundamental to Reason and Morality.
"Shark Attacks Rise Worldwide: Risk Assessment And Aquinas' Criteria For Sin"
"Thomas Aquinas On American Conservatives' Continual Commission Of Sin"
Concerning “perspective...”
It is striking that “The West” did not discover how to represent coherent visual perspective until The Renaissance.
'Til then, the world was relatively “flat” --- more or less one dimensional rather than three.
'Til then, the world was relatively “flat” --- more or less one dimensional rather than three.
The Role of Perspective In Shaping the Renaissance
Of course one can argue – as one can argue anything-- that one dimension is “better” than three...
But don't bet the farm!
Perspective
Renaissance Connect: “Discovering Linear Perspective”
Perspective: Brunelleschi's Revelatory Perception And The Re-Imaging Of Space
Notably, the world's “First True Scientist,” an Islamic Egyptian named “Alhazen", set forth the rules of visual perspective nearly half a millennium before Renaissance Europeans “discovered” these same principles.
Ibn al-Haytham, "Alhazen,""The First True Scientist," Trailblazes "Perspective"
Currently, Pope Francis is implementing the theological equivalent of "full visual perspective," propagating the multi-dimensional realization that Jesus is properly identified as Embodied Love - and by virtue of this identification everyone who embodies love – however imperfectly – enriches The Incarnation by doing the work of God-Love.
With this identification, Francis has taken Christianity's sectarian, uni-dimensional vision of Love and given it breath, depth and all conceivable space.
Lacking this multi-dimensional experience of Yeshua, here is how heretofore sand-blind Christian experience played out:
I was walking across a bridge one day, and I saw a man standing on the edge, about to jump off. So I ran over and said "Stop! Don't do it!""Why shouldn't I?" he said. "Well, there's so much to live for!""Like what?""Well... are you religious?" He said yes. I said, "Me too! Are you Christian or Buddhist?""Christian.""Me too! Are you Catholic or Protestant ? "Protestant.""Me too! Are you Episcopalian or Baptist?""Baptist""Wow! Me too! Are you Baptist Church of God or Baptist Church of the Lord?""Baptist Church of God!""Me too! Are you original Baptist Church of God, or are you reformed Baptist Church of God?""Reformed Baptist Church of God!""Me too! Are you Reformed Baptist Church of God, reformation of 1879, or Reformed Baptist Church of God, reformation of 1915?" He said, "Reformed Baptist Church of God, reformation of 1915!" I said, "Die, heretic scum", and pushed him off.
Emo Philips
Like Teilhard de Chardin before him, Frances is announcing the arrival of The Cosmic Christ, who in St. Paul's world-view, would put an end to the groaning and travail of "the whole Creation's birth."
"All around us we observe a pregnant creation. The difficult times of pain throughout the world are simply birth pangs."
Romans 8:22 The Message
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, SJPaleontologist/Cosmologist
Afterthought
Alan: Jesus made no reference to homosexuality or abortion, a peculiar
“oversight” for an individual who, according to Christian orthodoxy, participated
in the omniscient nature of God. Did Yeshua fail to see that homosexuality and
abortion would become the signal red button issues of post-Modern Christianity?
“oversight” for an individual who, according to Christian orthodoxy, participated
in the omniscient nature of God. Did Yeshua fail to see that homosexuality and
abortion would become the signal red button issues of post-Modern Christianity?
In light of this perceived importance, why did he not provide specific guidance?
On the other hand, Jesus did say: “Love your enemies. Do good to those who
persecute you.”
persecute you.”
(He also said: “Judge not lest you be judged.”)
Literalists!
It's your move!
***
"Love Your Enemies. Do Good To Those Who Hate You," Luke 6: 27-42
"Do You Know What You're Doing To Me?"
Jesus of Nazarethhttp://paxonbothhouses. blogspot.com/2013/12/do-you- know-what-youre-doing-to-me. html
"Love Your Enemies. Do Good To Those Who Hate You," Luke 6: 27-42
Jesus of Nazareth
http://paxonbothhouses.Yeshua Excoriates Fellow Pharisees: "The Woe Passages"
↧
This Year's Flu Epidemic Has Killed 15 Children In The U.S. Ebola Deaths Toll? 1
"Ebola Represents A Trivial Threat To Americans' Health"
This season's flu strain has mutated and made vaccines less effective
The flu virus has officially reached epidemic levels in the United States, according to the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Influenza has become widespread in 36 states, and almost 7% of all deaths in the U.S. during the week of Dec. 15 were due to pneumonia and influenza, the CDC said. Officials calculate that a total of 15 children have now died over the course of this flu season.
The CDC continues to recommend flu vaccinations for anyone over the age of six months even though this year’s strain has mutated rendering the vaccine less effective than public health officials had hoped.
"Self-Terrorization Is The National Pastime"
↧
↧
Great Music From Woodstock
John Sebastian
Woodstock
Sebastian's live performance of Darling Be Home Soon is exemplary.
Darling Be Home Soon
John Sebastian
I Get By With A Little Help From My Friends
Joe Cocker
Vietnam Song
Country Joe and The Fish
White Rabbit
Jefferson Airplane
Freedom
Richie Havens
Strawberry Fields - Hey Jude
Richie Havens
The Who
Crosby Stills, Nash
If I Were A Carpenter
Tim Hardin
(My church choir guitarist, Michael Reid was Hardin's lead guitarrist.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93f7vSt70hM
Woodstock Documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZedBs1uoKaA
Woodstock Documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZedBs1uoKaA
↧
Borowitz Report: Jeb Bush Clears Hurdle; Resigns As George W. Bush’s Brother
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—In the strongest sign to date that he intends to seek the 2016 Republican Presidential nomination, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush has officially resigned his position as George W. Bush’s brother.
“No longer being related to his brother is a key step to clearing Jeb’s path to the nomination,” an aide said on New Year’s Day. “We expect his poll numbers to soar on this.”
According to the aide, the former Florida governor resigned his post as brother in a ten-minute phone call with George W. Bush, after which he blocked the former President’s phone number and e-mail address.
In an official statement, George W. Bush said that he “understands and supports” his former brother’s decision.
“If I were him, I would no longer be related to me either,” he said.
↧
Article 5
Sebastian was born in New York City and grew up in Greenwich Village. His father, John Sebastian, was a noted classical harmonica player and his mother was a radio script writer. He is the godson of Vivian Vance (Ethel Mertz of I Love Lucy). He grew up surrounded by music and musicians, including Burl Ives and Woody Guthrie and hearing such players as Lead Belly and Mississippi John Hurt
Darling Be Home Soon
Sebastian's 1969 live performance of Darling Be Home Soon at Woodstock is exemplary.
Studio Version
Summer In The City
Do You Believe In Magic?
Studio Version
Live
You Didn't Have To Be So Nice
Studio Version
Live
Younger Girl
Live
John Sebastian Tanglewood Concert, 1970
↧
In His 1984 DNC Inaugural Address, Mario Cuomo Put The Emphasis On "We"
Mario Matthew Cuomo
Wikipedia
Although tempted to enter the seminary, Mario bought wife's his wedding ring with Pittsburgh Pirates' signing bonus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Cuomo
1984 Inaugural Address At The Democratic National Convention
"We can make it all the way with the whole family intact, the whole family on board... The failure - anywhere - to provide what reasonably we might to avoid pain is our failure."
You want calamities? What about the Ice Age? …
God made this world, but didn't complete it."Wikiquote
God made this world, but didn't complete it."
Pope Francis: What Christianity Looks Like When Believers Realize "God Is Love"
The Most Violent Culture In The History Of The Worldhttp://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2011/10/most-violent-culture-in-history-of.html
Compendium Of Pax Posts On Violent Criminals And Violent Police
The Most Violent Culture In The History Of The World
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2011/10/most-violent-culture-in-history-of.htmlCompendium Of Pax Posts On Violent Criminals And Violent Police
Mario Cuomo, 3-Term Governor, Father and Eloquent Liberal Beacon, Dies at 82
Mario M. Cuomo, the three-term governor of New York who commanded the attention of the country with a compelling public presence, a forceful defense of liberalism and his exhaustive ruminations about whether to run for president, died on Thursday at his home in Manhattan. He was 82.His family confirmed the death, which occurred only hours after Mr. Cuomo’s son Andrew M. Cuomo was inaugurated in Manhattan for a second term as governor.Mario Cuomo led New York during a turbulent time, 1983 through 1994. His ambitions for an activist government were thwarted by recession. He found himself struggling with the State Legislature not over what the government should do but over what programs should be cut, and what taxes should be raised, simply to balance the budget.
RELATED COVERAGE
Cuomo Puts Bigger Challenges on His Plate as He Begins His Second Term as Governor
Still, no matter the problems he found in Albany, Mr. Cuomo burst beyond the state’s boundaries to personify the liberal wing of his national party and become a source of unending fascination and, ultimately, frustration for Democrats, whose leaders twice pressed him to run for president, in 1988 and 1992, to no avail.
SLIDE SHOW|16 Photos
Mario Cuomo Is Dead at 82
Mario Cuomo Is Dead at 82
In an era when liberal thought was increasingly discredited, Mr. Cuomo, a man of large intellect and often unrestrained personality, celebrated it, challenging Ronald Reagan at the height of his presidency with an expansive and affirmative view of government and a message of compassion, tinged by the Roman Catholicism that was central to Mr. Cuomo’s identity.A man of contradictions who enjoyed Socratic arguments with himself, Mr. Cuomo seemed to disdain politics even as he embraced it. “What an ugly business this is,” he liked to say. Yet he reveled in it, proving himself an uncommonly skilled politician and sometimes a ruthless one.He was a tenacious debater and a spellbinding speaker at a time when political oratory seemed to be shrinking to the size of the television set. Delivering the keynote address at the 1984 Democratic National Convention in San Francisco, he eclipsed his party’s nominee, former Vice President Walter F. Mondale, seizing on Reagan’s description of America as “a shining city on a hill” to portray the president as unaware of impoverished Americans. “Mr. President,” he said, “you ought to know that this nation is more a ‘tale of two cities’ than it is just a ‘shining city on a hill.’ ”The speech was the high-water mark of his national political career, making him in many ways a more admired figure outside his state than in it.He enjoyed victories in New York. He closed the Shoreham nuclear plant on Long Island, ending a long and divisive fight over its potential dangers. He signed ethics legislation under a cloud of scandals involving state lawmakers and their employees.But he may be remembered more for the things he never did than for what he accomplished. His designs on the presidency became just flirtations. He encouraged President Bill Clinton to consider him for a seat on the Supreme Court but pulled back just as the offer was about to be made in 1993. For all his advocacy of an activist government, he did not always practice it, or could not, because of the fiscal obstacles he encountered in Albany.Always given to self-doubt and second-guessing, Mr. Cuomo said that if he had any regrets about his governorship, it was that he had never identified himself with a large initiative that might have been his legacy, as the expansion of the State University of New York was for Gov. Nelson A. Rockefeller.Mr. Cuomo noted that he had built more prison cells than any chief executive in the state’s history. But he added, “What I didn’t do was pick one thing and keep saying it over and over again, so I could have gotten credit for it.”He had a pointed sense of humor. When an engine failed in a puff of smoke on a state-owned Gulfstream G-1 jet one morning with the governor aboard, he barely noticed, and kept talking about national politics until he noticed that a reporter across the way had stopped taking notes and had turned ashen. “What’s the matter?” he asked. “Aren’t you in a state of grace?”Mr. Cuomo, the first Italian-American to be elected governor of New York, served longer than any of his 51 predecessors except Rockefeller. He might have surpassed Rockefeller, but in seeking a fourth term in 1994, he was defeated by George E. Pataki, a little-known Republican state senator from Peekskill. Mr. Cuomo’s advisers had counseled him not to run again, but he overruled them.Andrew Cuomo, a former housing secretary under President Clinton, sought to become governor himself in 2002, but withdrew from the Democratic field amid an uproar over remarks he had made questioning Governor Pataki’s leadership after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. He ran again in 2010 and was elected. It was a redemptive moment for the Cuomo family, and the first time in New York’s history that a father and son had been elected chief executive. Andrew Cuomo was handily re-elected in November.Mario Cuomo, a lawyer by profession, could trim his sails in the face of opposition, but he held to more than a few positions that went against the grain of public opinion. Most prominent was his opposition to the death penalty, an unpopular view that contributed to his defeat by Edward I. Koch in the 1977 mayoral primary in New York and that nearly derailed his first bid for governor. His annual veto of the death penalty became a rite, and he invoked it as a testimony to his character and principles.He was similarly resolute when he defied his church in 1984 by flying to the University of Notre Dame to proclaim that Roman Catholic politicians who personally opposed abortion, as he did, could appropriately support the right of a woman to have an abortion.Mr. Cuomo’s essentially liberal view of government never wavered, even after he effectively lost the argument when Democrats embraced the centrist Mr. Clinton. Years afterward, Mr. Cuomo would produce a copy of a speech he delivered to the progressive New Democratic Coalition in 1974, reading passages aloud with the same electric spirit and rolling cadences that had made him so evocative a speaker.In the end, two images of Mr. Cuomo endure. The first is of him, as governor, commanding the lectern at the 1984 Democratic convention, stilling a sea of delegates with his oratory. The second is of two chartered airplanes on the tarmac at the Albany airport in December 1991, waiting to fly him to New Hampshire to pay the $1,000 filing fee that would put his name on the state’s Democratic primary ballot for president.Mr. Cuomo, whose tortuous deliberations over whether to seek the White House had led pundits to call him “Hamlet on the Hudson,” put the decision off until 90 minutes before the 5 p.m. filing deadline. Then he emerged from the Executive Mansion to announce to a news conference at the Capitol that he would not run. The demands of negotiating a stalled state budget, he said, prevented him entering the race.“It seems to me I cannot turn my attention to New Hampshire while this threat hangs over the head of the New Yorkers that I’ve sworn to put first,” he said.That explanation failed to persuade even his closest friends, and in the years to come they would recall the two planes sitting forlornly on the tarmac as symbols of the governor’s unrealized promise.First Love Was BaseballMario Matthew Cuomo was born in Queens on June 15, 1932, the fourth child of Andrea and Immaculata Cuomo. His parents, penniless and unable to speak English, had come to the United States from the province of Salerno, south of Naples, settling at first in Jersey City.Mario grew up in the Queens neighborhood of South Jamaica, where the family had moved and opened a grocery store. Mario worked in the store and on Saturdays served as the “Shabbos goy” for an Orthodox synagogue up the street, providing services as a non-Jew that the faithful were not allowed to do for themselves on the Sabbath. South Jamaica — an “Italian-black-German-Irish-Polish neighborhood,” as Mr. Cuomo described it — provided him with a career’s worth of anecdotes.It was baseball, not politics, that first engaged him, and he proved as aggressive in one as in the other. After graduating from St. John’s Preparatory School in Queens in 1949, he played on the freshman baseball team at St. John’s University.A strapping six feet tall, 190 pounds at age 19, he signed a contract to play center field for the Class D Brunswick Pirates in Georgia in 1952, reportedly receiving a $2,000 signing bonus, sizable for that time. Mr. Cuomo “plays hard” and “will run over you if you get in his way,” a Pirates scout wrote.His baseball career was short-lived. Knocked in the head with a 3-and-2 fastball that summer, he was left blind for a week and forced to give up the game — leaving with a .244 batting average.Mr. Cuomo went back to St. John’s and graduated in 1953, having majored in Latin American studies, English and philosophy. By then he had settled on a law career and married Matilda N. Raffa, a fellow student. On a scholarship he enrolled in St. John’s Law School; while he studied there, his wife, who survives him, supported them as a teacher.Besides her and Andrew Cuomo, Mr. Cuomo is survived by four other children, Dr. Margaret I. Cuomo, Maria Cuomo Cole, Madeline Cuomo O’Donohue and Christopher Cuomo, a journalist at CNN; and several grandchildren.Mr. Cuomo’s first job in the law was as the confidential assistant to Judge Adrian P. Burke of the New York State Court of Appeals, which Mr. Cuomo would reshape 30 years later by appointing all seven members, including Judith S. Kaye, the first woman to serve as chief judge.His job with Judge Burke and his law school success — he graduated at the head of his class — led Mr. Cuomo to assume that in entering private practice he would have his pick of New York’s leading law firms. Instead, one after another rejected him, in his view because he was Italian-American. “I obviously am the original ethnic from Queens: my hands, my face, my voice, my inflections,” he said. The experience fed a lifelong disdain for anybody who struck Mr. Cuomo as elitist.He joined a Brooklyn law firm, Corner, Weisbrod, Froeb & Charles, in 1963 and entered public life the next year, when he took up the case of junkyard dealers whose property had been condemned; the planner Robert Moses wanted the land, 67 acres, to expand the site of the 1964 World’s Fair. Mr. Cuomo won a suit prohibiting the use of state funds for the project, and three years later the city decided against seizing the property for parkland.That victory brought him to the attention of 69 families facing eviction from their homes in a blue-collar Italian-American neighborhood in Corona, Queens, where the city wanted to build a school. Mr. Cuomo pressed the city and the courts into a compromise — a smaller school — that preserved 55 of the homes. And in 1972 Mayor John V. Lindsay recruited him to mediate a far more volatile city-neighborhood dispute, in Forest Hills, Queens, where middle-class families were trying to block construction of low-income public housing. Mr. Cuomo forged a compromise that cut the project in half.Entering Elective PoliticsHis successes impressed state Democratic leaders, and in 1974 Mr. Cuomo, at 42, entered elective politics as the party’s choice for lieutenant governor. He was challenged in a primary, however, by Mary Anne Krupsak, a state senator from upstate, who defeated him and was elected as the running mate of Hugh L. Carey, a Democratic congressman from Brooklyn.Mr. Carey, a fellow St. John’s alumnus, named Mr. Cuomo secretary of state, a relatively low-profile job in which Mr. Cuomo settled a rent strike at Co-op City in the Bronx and mediated a land dispute involving a Mohawk reservation.It was Mr. Carey who urged Mr. Cuomo to run for mayor of New York in 1977. Accepting the challenge with some trepidation, he found himself in a primary brawl with six brash New York politicians, among them Mr. Koch and Bella S. Abzug. In the first round Mr. Cuomo came within a percentage point of the winner, Mr. Koch, and the two headed into a runoff.It was a harsh campaign. In one instance placards appeared in middle-class neighborhoods proclaiming, “Vote for Cuomo, Not the Homo.” (Mr. Koch declined to answer questions about his sexual orientation.)Mr. Cuomo and his son Andrew, a campaign adviser, denied having anything to do with the placards, though Mr. Koch said he never fully believed it. At the same time, Mr. Koch was hammering Mr. Cuomo for his opposition to the death penalty. Mr. Cuomo replied that mayors had no vote on the issue and that in any case he supported a life sentence without parole for capital offenses. Mr. Koch won the runoff handily.Mr. Cuomo, on the Liberal Party line as well, was pressed to step aside in the general election. He refused, and lost to Mr. Koch for the third time. But he had learned a lesson. “I swore when it was over, to myself and everyone else, that I would never do that again,” he said. “I will never run a race that I don’t have my whole heart in.”Despite friction between Mr. Cuomo and Governor Carey, the two needed each other in 1978, when Lieutenant Governor Krupsak withdrew from the Carey re-election ticket and announced she would challenge the governor for the Democratic nomination, portraying him as incompetent. Mr. Carey asked Mr. Cuomo to be his running mate, and they won easily, in both the primary and the general election.Mr. Cuomo’s chance for the governor’s mansion came when Mr. Carey announced he would not seek a third term, in 1982. Declaring his candidacy, Mr. Cuomo once again found himself in a race with Mr. Koch. Though the mayor was the party favorite, Mr. Cuomo won enough votes at the Democratic convention in Syracuse to force a primary.
PLAY VIDEO|6:11
Cuomo at the 1984 Democratic Convention
Cuomo at the 1984 Democratic Convention
Mr. Koch’s candidacy was undermined from the start by the publication of an interview in Playboy magazine in which he disparaged life upstate and in the suburbs as “sterile” and lamented the prospect of living in the “small town” of Albany.Mr. Cuomo proceeded to overwhelm Mr. Koch with muscular campaigning and a command of New York politics resulting in part from his years in Albany building a support network of state party leaders, local officials and union organizers.But he did not win over Mr. Carey, whose relationship with Mr. Cuomo remained strained. The governor endorsed Mr. Koch. But it did not matter in the end: Mr. Cuomo defeated Mr. Koch by almost 100,000 votes.In the general election, amid a national recession, Mr. Cuomo tied his Republican opponent, the businessman Lewis E. Lehrman, to President Reagan’s economic policies and pounded him in debates, noting that Mr. Lehrman was rich enough to finance much of his campaign. At one point Mr. Cuomo theatrically fixed his gaze on Mr. Lehrman’s wristwatch and remarked, “That’s a very expensive watch, Lew.”On Nov. 2, 1982, at age 50, Mr. Cuomo became the 52nd man to be elected New York’s governor, defeating Mr. Lehrman by about 180,000 votes out of more than five million cast.Mr. Cuomo was sworn in on Jan. 1, 1983, before 2,600 people in the convention center of the Nelson A. Rockefeller-Empire State Plaza in Albany. (It was the first time since 1929 that the ceremonies were not held in the ornate but far smaller Assembly chamber.)His inaugural address struck a familiar theme, calling on state government to “be a positive source for good.” But for a national audience it also offered a critique of Reagan policies and a liberal vision for the country. Fiscal prudence, Mr. Cuomo asserted, did not prevent government from providing “shelter for the homeless, work for the idle, care for the elderly and infirm, and hope for the destitute.”With his mother seated onstage with him, Mr. Cuomo finished his speech by urging his audience to “pray that we all see New York for the family that it is.” Then he glanced up and invoked his father, who died in 1981 at 79, saying, “Pop, wherever you are — and I think I know — for all the ceremony and the big house and the pomp and circumstance, please don’t let me forget that.”From the start, Mr. Cuomo was a storm of energy and ideas. Within days, in the role of mediator again, he faced down a prison strike at Ossining — the old Sing Sing — in which 19 guards were held hostage. After 53 hours, the hostages were freed. He went on to veto the death penalty.But Mr. Cuomo could not satisfy everyone’s hopes. He responded to an inherited $1.8 billion deficit by proposing tax increases and deep cuts in the state payroll, stunning the labor unions that had supported him. Many other supporters grew disenchanted.He seemed inexhaustible, though. Reporters and legislators discovered that he was apt to pick up his own phone if they called his office on a Friday evening. “I’m sleeping less and less,” he said. “I work all the time. I’m not saying that’s a virtue.”He displayed a restless intellect and a love of learning. He liked to cite the French theologian and Jesuit priest Teilhard de Chardin (1881-1955), who wrote that endeavors should be based not on personal ambition, which can be a sin, but on a desire to contribute to the greater good of mankind and God.There were other clues to Mr. Cuomo’s manner. His precise parsing of an argument suggested indecision or even disingenuousness and sometimes brought him ridicule. Once, while fencing with reporters, he walked himself into the unlikely position of denying that the Mafia existed. “You’re telling me that the Mafia is an organization,” he said, “and I’m telling you that’s a lot of baloney.”
RECENT COMMENTS
MoneyRules
Barbara
JE
In public he might respond to criticism with expressions of indignation and frustration; in private, with rage, often directed at legislators and reporters, often expressed in obscenity-laden early-morning telephone calls. The problem, he said in an interview at the time, was that people were not paying close enough attention to his words.Taking On ReaganBy 1984, a presidential election year, there was a different view of Mr. Cuomo outside New York. An eloquent spokesman for liberal politics, he stood out in a relatively barren field of Democrats with national stature. And behind the scenes, two close advisers, his son Andrew and Tim Russert, who went on to host “Meet the Press,” saw an opportunity. They successfully lobbied the party to invite Mr. Cuomo to deliver the keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention in San Francisco.On the night of July 16, as the lights at the Moscone Center were dimmed — a bit of stage management orchestrated by the two advisers — Mr. Cuomoseized his moment, depicting President Reagan as having turned his back on struggling Americans.“A shining city is perhaps all the president sees from the portico of the White House and the veranda of his ranch, where everyone seems to be doing well,” Mr. Cuomo said. “But there’s another part to the shining city. In this part of the city there are more poor than ever, more families in trouble, more and more people who need help but can’t find it.”He became the story of the convention, overshadowing the nominee, Mr. Mondale, and an instant prospective candidate for president in 1988 should Mr. Mondale fail, as he was widely expected to do (and did).In the excitement of the evening, many Democrats failed to notice that the object of this attention had left for the airport, for a flight back to Albany. Mr. Cuomo liked to sleep in his own bed.That fall, with Mr. Mondale on his way to a crushing defeat, Mr. Cuomo volunteered that if he decided to seek the presidency in 1988, he would not seek a second term as governor in 1986. The declaration reflected how much interest there was in the governor at the time. It was also perceived as undercutting Mr. Mondale in the last weeks of his campaign, which many Democrats assumed was Mr. Cuomo’s intention.By then Mr. Cuomo, who kept a full-time pollster on his staff, had realized that every time there was speculation about his presidential ambitions, his popularity at home soared. Preparing for his own re-election campaign in 1986, he kept his hand in national politics, traveling across the nation and preparing for overseas travel.His re-election campaign should have been a triumph; instead it was by all appearances an unhappy passage. Until the final week he had declined to debate his overmatched Republican opponent, Andrew P. O’Rourke, the Westchester County executive, and had been irate at suggestions that such behavior was unsportsmanlike. He won a record 65 percent of the vote, but rather than celebrating, he retreated to his office in a quarrelsome mood. A few weeks later, he said to a reporter for The New York Times: “You set out to hurt me, and you succeeded. I hope you sleep well.” The next morning, he called the reporter back at home, offering an apology from “an old man with a bad back.”The election behind him, Mr. Cuomo announced a new schedule of national travel, encouraging renewed speculation about his interest in the White House. So it came as a surprise one evening in February 1987 when Mr. Cuomo, making his regular appearance on a radio call-in show, declared that he would not run.Power Declines at HomeMr. Cuomo turned his attention to Albany. He and the Legislature agreed to a new ethics code governing state and local government officials and state employees. He proclaimed 1988 the beginning of the decade of the child, 1989 the year to fight drug abuse and 1990, when he was up for re-election again, the year of the environment.But after Vice President George Bush, the Republican nominee for president, defeated Gov. Michael S. Dukakis, the Democrat, in 1988, speculation about Mr. Cuomo inevitably grew again.But he was no longer the formidable figure in New York he had been. His popularity ratings had dropped. State legislators, who had never been fond of him, were emboldened to challenge him. He pinned the blame for this erosion of support on the way the news media had covered his response to all the talk about a presidential run.“You’ve done everything but call me a liar,” he told The Washington Post, speaking generally of the press. “You said that I was cute. You said that I misplayed the game. You said that I was really waiting for another scenario. Well, the net result of that is it costs me credibility, because you spent all those months saying I was conning people.”Recession, too, was looming and state revenues were declining. Still, in 1990, he won a third term. His Republican opponent, Pierre A. Rinfret, a financial consultant and economics adviser to presidents, had not been taken seriously even by his own party.It was a convincing but unsatisfying victory: Mr. Cuomo had done better against Mr. O’Rourke four years before.When he returned to Albany to deliver his ninth State of the State address, Mr. Cuomo suggested diminished ambitions for his next term. “This is a wonderful year for raw truth,” he said. “We don’t have any money.”But he had one more presidential flirtation left in him: in October 1991, while on a trip to Chicago, he said he was “looking at” a run. Many of his supporters had grown weary of such talk, some viewing it as a ruse to reinvigorate his sagging political image. And that December, with the planes waiting on the runway, he announced again that he would not be a candidate for president.It always bothered him, Mr. Cuomo said years later, that no one had taken him at his word. He would have run, he said in an interview for this obituary, had Republicans simply agreed to his request to pass a budget.“I somehow got this reputation of diddling and dithering,” Mr. Cuomo said. “I don’t remember dithering at all.”Stunned by PatakiMr. Cuomo’s remaining years in Albany were a series of grim footnotes as he struggled to keep the government afloat in worsening times. Mr. Clinton was on the verge of naming him to the Supreme Court when he asked that his name be withdrawn; Mr. Cuomo later said that he had never wanted the job.When the 1994 election season began, he seemed unaware of how much his popularity had eroded. He was stunned, he said, that someone like Mr. Pataki could pose a serious challenge to someone with his credentials. Mr. Pataki defeated him by five percentage points.Mr. Cuomo returned to Manhattan to work for the law firm of Willkie Farr & Gallagher, write books and give speeches. He grew wealthy and, he said, happy. He was always attuned to how he was perceived by the public, and when invited to sum up his own life for this obituary, he characteristically turned to self-deprecating humor.“People asked me what I want as an epitaph,” Mr. Cuomo said. He then reprised a line he had used many years earlier traveling across upstate New York, a fresh public figure displaying astonishing talent and obvious potential.“He tried,” Mr. Cuomo said.
Former New York Governor Mario Cuomo dead at 82
January 1, 2015New York, NY (WBNG Binghamton) New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo was sworn in Thursday, along with new Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul. After the ceremony, Cuomo reflected on his first term and his plans for the future as he touched on many different subjects.
He began speaking about what New York state has accomplished in the last four years -- citing new gun control laws, becoming a state that supports marriage equality and lowering the number of HIV and AIDS infections.
Throughout his speech, Cuomo put the emphasis on ‘”we.”
"We are republicans and democrats who put New York first and political parties second -- even in this age of hyper-partisanship,” Cuomo (D) said. “We remembered what we were there to do, which is to serve the public and not our political interest.”
Throughout his speech, Cuomo put the emphasis on ‘”we.”
"We are republicans and democrats who put New York first and political parties second -- even in this age of hyper-partisanship,” Cuomo (D) said. “We remembered what we were there to do, which is to serve the public and not our political interest.”
After reflecting on what has already been accomplished, the governor spoke about the future, moving on to our education system.
"Today, we have two education systems, if we want to tell the truth -- one for the rich and one for the poor,” he said. “And if you happen to be born in the wrong zip code and go to a failing school, you will be left behind and never catch up."
Cuomo said we will never solve the problems we are unwilling to admit. He quoted Frederick Douglass saying, "If there is no struggle, there is no progress."
Moving forward to his second term, Cuomo said the time is now for New York to be bold and fearless moving forward.
↧
↧
Howard Zinn: Champion Of Hope
Howard Zinn
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Zinn
How Zinn's career as a WWII bombardier converted him from violence to peace.
***
"The terrible thing about our time is precisely the ease with which theories can be put into practice. The more perfect, the more idealistic the theories, the more dreadful is their realization. We are at last beginning to rediscover what perhaps men knew better in very ancient times, in primitive times before utopias were thought of: that liberty is bound up with imperfection, and that limitations, imperfections, errors are not only unavoidable but also salutary. The best is not the ideal. Where what is theoretically best is imposed on everyone as the norm, then there is no longer any room even to be good. The best, imposed as a norm, becomes evil.”
"Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander,” by Trappist monk, Father Thomas Merton
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2012/04/merton-best-imposed-as-norm-becomes.html
↧
Howard Zinn's World War II Career As A Bombardier Converted Him From Violence To Peace
Howard Zinn's the Bomb
By David Swanson
The late Howard Zinn's new book "The Bomb" is a brilliant little dissection of some of the central myths of our militarized society. Those who've read "A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA's Secret Cold War Experiments," by H.P. Albarelli Jr. know that this is a year for publishing the stories of horrible things that the United States has done to French towns. In that case, Albarelli, describes the CIA administering LSD to an entire town, with deadly results. In "The Bomb," Zinn describes the U.S. military making its first use of napalm by dropping it all over another French town, burning anyone and anything it touched. Zinn was in one of the planes, taking part in this horrendous crime.
In mid-April 1945, the war in Europe was essentially over. Everyone knew it was ending. There was no military reason (if that's not an oxymoron) to attack the Germans stationed near Royan, France, much less to burn the French men, women, and children in the town to death. The British had already destroyed the town in January, similarly bombing it because of its vicinity to German troops, in what was widely called a tragic mistake. This tragic mistake was rationalized as an inevitable part of war, just as were the horrific firebombings that successfully reached German targets, just as was the later bombing of Royan with napalm. Zinn blames the Supreme Allied Command for seeking to add a "victory" in the final weeks of a war already won. He blames the local military commanders' ambitions. He blames the American Air Force's desire to test a new weapon. And he blames everyone involved -- which must include himself -- for "the most powerful motive of all: the habit of obedience, the universal teaching of all cultures, not to get out of line, not even to think about that which one has not been assigned to think about, the negative motive of not having either a reason or a will to intercede."
When Zinn returned from the war in Europe, he expected to be sent to the war in the Pacific, until he saw and rejoiced at seeing the news of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, 65 years ago this August. Only years later did Zinn come to understand the inexcusable crime of the greatest proportions that was the dropping of nuclear bombs in Japan, actions similar in some ways to the final bombing of Royan. The war with Japan was already over, the Japanese seeking peace and willing to surrender. Japan asked only that it be permitted to keep its emperor, a request that was later granted. But, like napalm, the nuclear bombs were weapons that needed testing. The second bomb, dropped on Nagasaki, was a different sort of bomb that also needed testing. President Harry Truman wanted to demonstrate nuclear bombs to the world and especially to Russia. And he wanted to end the war with Japan before Russia became part of it. The horrific form of mass murder he employed was in no way justifiable.
Zinn also goes back to dismantle the mythical reasons the United States was in the war to begin with. The United States, England, and France were imperial powers supporting each other's international aggressions in places like the Philippines. They opposed the same from Germany and Japan, but not aggression itself. Most of America's tin and rubber came from the Southwest Pacific. The United States made clear for years its lack of concern for the Jews being attacked in Germany. It also demonstrated its lack of opposition to racism through its treatment of African Americans and Japanese Americans. Franklin D. Roosevelt described fascist bombing campaigns over civilian areas as "inhuman barbarity" but then did the same on a much larger scale to German cities, which was followed up by the destruction on an unprecedented scale of Hiroshima and Nagasaki -- actions that came after years of dehumanizing the Japanese. Zinn points out that "LIFE magazine showed a picture of a Japanese person burning to death and commented: 'This is the only way.'" Aware that the war would end without any more bombing, and aware that U.S. prisoners of war would be killed by the bomb dropped on Nagasaki, the U.S. military went ahead and dropped the bombs.
Americans allowed these things to be done in their name, just as the Germans and Japanese allowed horrible crimes to be committed in their names. Zinn points out, with his trademark clarity, how the use of the word "we" blends governments together with peoples and serves to equate our own people with our military, while we demonize the people of other lands because of actions by their governments. "The Bomb" suggest a better way to think about such matters and firmly establishes that
--what the U.S. military is doing now, today, parallels the crimes of the past and shares their dishonorable motivations;
--the bad wars have a lot in common with the so-called "good war," about which there was little if anything good;
--Howard Zinn did far more in his life for peace than for war, and more for peace than just about anybody else, certainly more than several Nobel Peace Prize winners.
--what the U.S. military is doing now, today, parallels the crimes of the past and shares their dishonorable motivations;
--the bad wars have a lot in common with the so-called "good war," about which there was little if anything good;
--Howard Zinn did far more in his life for peace than for war, and more for peace than just about anybody else, certainly more than several Nobel Peace Prize winners.
↧
False Tax Claims Debunked. Guess Which Party Circulated These Lies
So...
Why would people tax themselves?
Just to piss their money away?
There are bona fide government bills to be pay and taxation is the way to pay them.
Americans Think Foreign Aid Consumes 1/3rd Of GNP. This % Is Totally Hallucinated
Americans Clamor For Budget Cuts But Have No Intention To Enact Them
Alan: Of all the Founding Fathers, Ben Franklin was the most successful businessman. Here's what Ben had to say about taxation.
Benjamin Franklin to Robert Morris: On Taxes
25 December, 1783
25 December, 1783
"The Remissness of our People in Paying Taxes is highly blameable; the Unwillingness to pay them is still more so. I see, in some Resolutions of Town Meetings, a Remonstrance against giving Congress a Power to take, as they call it, the People's Money out of their Pockets, tho' only to pay the Interest and Principal of Debts duly contracted. They seem to mistake the Point. Money, justly due from the People, is their Creditors' Money, and no longer the Money of the People, who, if they withold it, should be compell'd to pay by some Law. All Property, indeed, except the Savage's temporary Cabin, his Bow, his Matchcoat, and other little Acquisitions, absolutely necessary for his Subsistence, seems to me to be the Creature of public Convention. Hence the Public has the Right of Regulating Descents, and all other Conveyances of Property, and even of limiting the Quantity and the Uses of it. All the Property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other Laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it." http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch16s12.html
↧
(Not) Letterman's Top Ten Reasons To Vote Democratic. And Einstein Didn't Say That
Alan: The above quote is vintage Letterman,
lacerating American conservatives for being incorrigible dimwits.
Snopes: http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/letterman.asp
#10. I vote Democrat because I love the fact that I can now marry whatever I want. I've decided to marry my German Shepherd.
#9. I vote Democrat because I believe oil companies' profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene, but the government taxing the same gallon at 15%+ isn't.
#8. I vote Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would.
#7. I vote Democrat because Freedom of Speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.
#6. I vote Democrat because I'm way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me from murderers and thieves. I am also thankful that we have a 911 service that gets police to your home in order to identify your body after a home invasion.
#5. I vote Democrat because I'm not concerned about millions of babies being aborted so long as we keep all death row inmates alive and comfy.
#4. I vote Democrat because I think illegal aliens have a right to free health care, education, and Social Security benefits and we should take away Social Security from those who paid into it.
#3. I vote Democrat because I believe that businesses should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as the Democrat Party sees fit.
#2. I vote Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.
And
#1 reason I vote Democrat is because I think it's better to pay $billions$ for oil to people who hate us, but not drill our own because it might upset some endangered beetle, gopher or fish here in America. We don't care about the beetles, gophers, or fish in those other countries.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein http://quoteinvestigator.com/2014/07/28/genius/
↧
↧
Hermann Melville On Misunderstanding And Uncharitability
Reading these quotations moves me to reflect on the current state of American "conservatism."
Mario Cuomo saw it coming...
In His 1984 DNC Inaugural Address, Mario Cuomo Put The Emphasis On "We"
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2015/01/in-1984-dnc-inaugural-address-mario.html
↧
Handguns At Home... And The Scourge Of Suicide Among Young People
"Listen kid... Don't even think about winging him.
The sweet spot is right between the eyes."
Teach Your Children Well
Alan: It is madness to normalize guns-in-homes where children live.
Harboring guns near children is not only irresponsible but constitutes reckless endangerment.
If you are a gun supporter, ask yourself these 4 questions:
"Do you know anyone who saved his life by pulling a pistol in self-defense?"
"Do you know anyone who died from a pistol shot?" (If so, suicide or homicide?)
"Do you know anyone who was killed in a car accident?"
"Do you know anyone who was killed in a car accident who was not wearing a seat belt?"
Duh.
Harboring guns near children is not only irresponsible but constitutes reckless endangerment.
If you are a gun supporter, ask yourself these 4 questions:
"Do you know anyone who saved his life by pulling a pistol in self-defense?"
"Do you know anyone who died from a pistol shot?" (If so, suicide or homicide?)
"Do you know anyone who was killed in a car accident?"
"Do you know anyone who was killed in a car accident who was not wearing a seat belt?"
Duh.
For young Americans, 15-24, suicide (60% by firearm) is the third leading cause of death
Suicide in the Home in Relation to Gun Ownership
Arthur L. Kellermann, MD, MPH; Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH; et al, The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 327, No. 7, August 13, 1992
Key Statistic: The presence of one or more guns in the home increases the risk of suicide in the home nearly five times.
Guns in homes increase risk of death and firearm-related violence
Firearm Access Is A Risk Factor For Suicide
Guns in home increase likelihood of violent death
Sandy Hook Kindergarten Carnage
Firearm Injury And Death Charts For The U.S. (And The World)
University of Pennsylvania
The Most Violent Culture In The History Of The World
America's Gun Violence Map
Mom killed by own gun at Idaho Wal-Mart described as responsible
HAYDEN, Idaho -- A 29-year-old woman fatally shot with her own gun by her 2-year-old son at a northern Idaho Wal-Mart was described as "not the least bit irresponsible."
The little boy reached into Veronica J. Rutledge's purse and her concealed gun fired, Kootenai County sheriff's spokesman Stu Miller said. The woman was shopping Tuesday with her son and three other children, Miller said.
CBS News correspondent Don Dahler reports law enforcement officials have reviewed surveillance tapes from inside the store but have yet to decide whether to make that video public.
The other children, all under the age of 11, were members of her extended family, Dahler reports. Rutledge was from Blackfoot in southeastern Idaho, and her family had come to the area to visit relatives.
Carrying a concealed weapon is legal in Idaho, and more than 7 percent of its adults have a permit to do so, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
Rutledge was an employee of the Idaho National Laboratory, The Spokesman-Review of Spokane, Washington, reported. The Idaho Falls laboratory supports the U.S. Department of Energy in nuclear and energy research and national defense.
Miller said the young boy was left in a shopping cart, reached into his mother's purse and grabbed a small-caliber handgun, which discharged one time.
Deputies who responded to the Wal-Mart found Rutledge dead, the sheriff's office said.
"It appears to be a pretty tragic accident," Miller said.
The victim's father-in-law, Terry Rutledge, told The Associated Press that Veronica Rutledge "was a beautiful, young, loving mother."
"She was not the least bit irresponsible," Terry Rutledge said. "She was taken much too soon."
The woman's husband was not in the store when the shooting happened at about 10:20 a.m. Tuesday. Miller said the man arrived shortly after the shooting. All the children were taken to a relative's house.
The shooting occurred in the Wal-Mart in Hayden, Idaho, a town about 40 miles northeast of Spokane. The store closed for the rest of the day.
Brooke Buchanan, a spokeswoman for Wal-Mart, said in a statement the shooting was a "very sad and tragic accident."
"We are working closely with the local sheriff's department while they investigate what happened," Buchanan said.
Idaho National Laboratory senior chemical engineer Vince Maio worked with Rutledge on a research paper about using glass ceramic to store nuclear waste, The Spokesman-Review said.
Maio said he was immediately impressed with her.
"She had a lot of maturity for her age," he told the newspaper. "Her work was impeccable. She found new ways to do things that we did before and she found ways to do them better."
"She was a beautiful person," he added.
There do not appear to be reliable national statistics about the number of accidental fatalities involving children handling guns.
In neighboring Washington state, a 3-year-old boy was seriously injured in November when he accidentally shot himself in the face in a home in Lake Stevens, about 30 miles north of Seattle.
In April, a 2-year-old boy apparently shot and killed his 11-year-old sister while they and their siblings played with a gun inside a Philadelphia home. Authorities said the gun was believed to have been brought into the home by the mother's boyfriend.
Hayden is a politically conservative town of about 9,000 people just north of Coeur d'Alene, in Idaho's northern panhandle.
Idaho lawmakers passed legislation earlier this year allowing concealed weapons on the state's public college and university campuses.
Despite facing opposition from all eight of the state's university college presidents, lawmakers sided with gun rights advocates who said the law would better uphold the Second Amendment.
Under the law, gun holders are barred from bringing their weapons into dormitories or buildings that hold more than 1,000 people, such as stadiums or concert halls.
The Right-Wing Dream
Absolute Safety vouchsafed by ubiquitous firearms.
(The impossible quest to make Reality safer than God intended is the core appeal of fascism.)
If every passenger can "pack," then every terrorist would have a firearm and only a few citizens.
Those who think ubiquitous firearms are a solution to any of life's problems contribute to the problem.
The likelihood that well-armed citizens will perform acts of sudden, salvific heroicism when a criminal already "has the drop" is vanishingly remote.
Such wishful thinking is the product of arrested development, the vestigial puerility of children playing at "cowboys and Indians."
Many more innocent Americans are killed by firearms "in the home" than the piddling number of Americans saved by domestic firearm heroics.
And when, at rare intervals, such heroics do occur, they often result in the death of property thieves who harbor no violent intent.
Where are the Christian literalists when we need them?
“You have heard it said, ‘An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.’ But now I tell you: do not take revenge on someone who wrongs you. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, let him slap your left cheek too. And if someone takes you to court to sue you for your shirt, let him have your coat as well. And if one of the occupation troops forces you to carry his pack one mile, carry it two miles. When someone asks you for something, give it to him; when someone wants to borrow something, lend it to him. “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your friends, hate your enemies.’ But now I tell you: love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may become the children of your Father in heaven. For he makes his sun to shine on bad and good people alike, and gives rain to those who do good and to those who do evil. Why should God reward you if you love only the people who love you? Even the tax collectors do that! And if you speak only to your friends, have you done anything out of the ordinary? Even the pagans do that! You must be whole—just as your Father in heaven is whole."
Where are the Christian literalists when we need them?
“You have heard it said, ‘An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.’ But now I tell you: do not take revenge on someone who wrongs you. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, let him slap your left cheek too. And if someone takes you to court to sue you for your shirt, let him have your coat as well. And if one of the occupation troops forces you to carry his pack one mile, carry it two miles. When someone asks you for something, give it to him; when someone wants to borrow something, lend it to him. “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your friends, hate your enemies.’ But now I tell you: love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may become the children of your Father in heaven. For he makes his sun to shine on bad and good people alike, and gives rain to those who do good and to those who do evil. Why should God reward you if you love only the people who love you? Even the tax collectors do that! And if you speak only to your friends, have you done anything out of the ordinary? Even the pagans do that! You must be whole—just as your Father in heaven is whole."
I am 67 years old and have friends "on both sides of the aisle."
I have never heard any of them say that their firearm saved a life.
I have never heard any of them say they know someone whose life was saved by a firearm.
Occassional anecdotes do not establish "general rules."
I have never heard any of them say that their firearm saved a life.
I have never heard any of them say they know someone whose life was saved by a firearm.
Occassional anecdotes do not establish "general rules."
On the flip side of this coin, I have heard several friends say firearms were used by family members to kill themselves.
Whether by accident... sudden eruption of anger... or by psychological disease... firearms in citizens' homes exact a terrifyingly high toll with correspondingly trivial benefit.
***
The belief that individual heroes will "save the day" is essentially self-ish.
Yes, an occasional hero will "save the day."
But arming an entire society increases cumulative carnage.
***
***
"One of the most disturbing facts that came out in the [Adolf] Eichmann trial was that a psychiatrist examined him and pronounced him perfectly sane. I do not doubt it at all, and that is precisely why I find it disturbing. . . The sanity of Eichmann is disturbing. We equate sanity with a sense of justice, with humaneness, with prudence, with the capacity to love and understand other people. We rely on the sane people of the world to preserve it from barbarism, madness, destruction. And now it begins to dawn on us that it is precisely the sane ones who are the most dangerous. It is the sane ones, the well-adapted ones, who can without qualms and without nausea aim the missiles and press the buttons that will initiate the great festival of destruction that they, the sane ones, have prepared. What makes us so sure, after all, that the danger comes from a psychotic getting into a position to fire the first shot in a nuclear war? Psychotics will be suspect. The sane ones will keep them far from the button. No one suspects the sane, and the sane ones will have perfectly good reasons, logical, well-adjusted reasons, for firing the shot. They will be obeying sane orders that have come sanely down the chain of command. And because of their sanity they will have no qualms at all. When the missiles take off, then, it will be no mistake."
"A Devout Meditation in Memory of Adolf Eichmann" in Raids on the Unspeakable." Thomas Merton - New York: New Directions Publishing Co., 1964
↧
Best Pax Posts: Guns In The Home And The Epidemic Slaughter Of Children
"Listen kid... Don't even think about winging him.
The sweet spot is right between the eyes.
For young Americans, 15-24, suicide (60% by firearm) is the third leading cause of death
Suicide in the Home in Relation to Gun Ownership
Arthur L. Kellermann, MD, MPH; Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH; et al, The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 327, No. 7, August 13, 1992
Key Statistic: The presence of one or more guns in the home increases the risk of suicide in the home nearly five times.
Guns in homes increase risk of death and firearm-related violence
Firearm Access Is A Risk Factor For Suicide
Guns in home increase likelihood of violent death
Sandy Hook Kindergarten Carnage
Firearm Injury And Death Charts For The U.S. (And The World)
University of Pennsylvania
The Most Violent Culture In The History Of The World
America's Gun Violence Map
↧
The National Debt And The Next American Revolution
On a sterner note, Franklin held that government had the right to tax away everything but those belongings necessary for an individual's "survival."
"He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it."
"He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it."
Dear James,
Thanks for your emails.
I think the Debt Crisis - like all crises - is an opportunity "in disguise."
When people get hit in the wallets, they act.
'Til then, they display the sluggishness of pleasured consumer units.
Although upward pressure on the national debt will plummet when our own baby boomer generation dies off, mounting medical expense (in the absence of "revolutionary" change) is on course to exhaust the treasury - perhaps in our lifetime.
When this medically-induced debt crisis comes to a head, the only quick way to halve medical expense is single payer healthcare or some other centrally-managed government program.
National Geographic: Per Capita Healthcare Expenditure Correlated To Longevity
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2013/03/national-geographic-chart-of-per-capita.html
It will also become clear that the only way to keep the debt from killing the economy is to pay it off "on the backs" of The 5%.
"Plutocracy Triumphant"Cartoon Compendium
"The Rich Aren't Just Grabbing A Bigger Slice Of The Pie. They're Taking It All"
Between 2007 And 2010, The Net Worth Of American Families Plummeted 40%
"Taibbi: The $9 Billion Whistle Blower At JPMorgan-Chase. Financial Thuggery At The Top"
"Pope Francis Links"
"Pope Francis Links"
Although Ben Franklin -- the most financially successful Founding Father -- was opposed to "government handouts," he made the following comment concerning the need to tax citizens, even if taxation stripped them of everything but a modest home and "the tools of their trade."
Ben's view of taxation may be the most "revolutionary" position ever set forth by a major American politician.
Benjamin Franklin to Robert Morris: On Taxes
"The Remissness of our People in Paying Taxes is highly blameable; the Unwillingness to pay them is still more so. I see, in some Resolutions of Town Meetings, a Remonstrance against giving Congress a Power to take, as they call it, the People's Money out of their Pockets, tho' only to pay the Interest and Principal of Debts duly contracted. They seem to mistake the Point. Money, justly due from the People, is their Creditors' Money, and no longer the Money of the People, who, if they withold it, should be compell'd to pay by some Law. All Property, indeed, except the Savage's temporary Cabin, his Bow, his Matchcoat, and other little Acquisitions, absolutely necessary for his Subsistence, seems to me to be the Creature of public Convention. Hence the Public has the Right of Regulating Descents, and all other Conveyances of Property, and even of limiting the Quantity and the Uses of it. All the Property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other Laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it."
"Politics And Economics: The 101 Courses You Wish You Had"Paz contigo
Alan
PS Speaking of Founding Fathers, here's a worthy idea:
"Founding Fathers Profit-Sharing Remedy For Inequality. Even Ronald Reagan Likes It!"("The History Of Corporations In The United States. A Return To Roots?")
"Politics And Economics: The 101 Courses You Wish You Had"
Paz contigo
Alan
PS Speaking of Founding Fathers, here's a worthy idea:
"Founding Fathers Profit-Sharing Remedy For Inequality.
Even Ronald Reagan Likes It!"
("The History Of Corporations In The United States. A Return To Roots?")
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:01 AM, James K wrote:
Starting the new year on a note of "optimism!"
It would be nice. date: Wed, Dec 31, 2014 subject: Some clear thinking on the debt
If you haven't heard yet, the United States of America just hit $16 trillion in debt yesterday. On a gross, nominal basis, this makes the US, by far, the greatest debtor in the history of the world.
It took the United States government over 200 years to accumulate its first trillion dollars of debt. It took only 286 days to accumulate the most recent trillion dollars of debt. 200 years vs. 286 days. This portends two key points:
1. Anyone who thinks that inflation doesn't exist is a complete idiot;
2. To say that the trend is unsustainable is a massive understatement.
At an average interest rate of 2.130%, Uncle Sam will shuffle $340 billion out the door just in interest payments this year... and it's a number that's only going up. To put it in context, China owns so much US debt that the INTEREST INCOME they receive from the Treasury Department is nearly enough to fund their entire military budget. (Karl Marx claimed a Capitalist would sell his executioner the rope used to hang him!-JK)
Yet when you look at the raw numbers, there is no sign of improvement anywhere on the horizon. Last year, the Treasury Department brought in about $2.3 trillion in tax revenue. They spent $2.9 trillion JUST on mandatory programs like Social Security and Medicare, plus the very sacrosanct defense budget.
In other words, the US government was $600 billion dollars in the hole before paying a dime of interest on the debt, or paying the light bill at the White House. In fact the government's own numbers reflect a budget deficit through the end of the decade, i.e. the debt level is only going to get higher. These are their own figures.
In the 19th century, the Ottoman Empire was facing a similar debt crisis. In just 11-years, the Ottoman central government went from spending 17% of its tax revenue on interest payments, to spending over 52% of its tax revenue on interest payments. Then came default. Eleven years. The US is at 15% right now. How long will it take for the interest burden to become unbearable?
History is full of examples of superpowers bucking under the weight of their debt. This is not the first time that it's happened, and it won't be the last.
Sovereign debt is a giant confidence game. Investors buy bonds on the belief that governments can (and will) pay. When that confidence is chipped away, the cost of capital becomes debilitating. And people tend to notice a $16 trillion debt burden.
This is banana republic stuff, plain and simple... and smart, thinking people ought to be planning on capital controls, wage and price controls, pension confiscation, and selective default. Because
the next trillion will be here before you know it.
↧
↧
"Remembering Mario Cuomo," Time Magazine
In His 1984 DNC Inaugural Address, Mario Cuomo Put The Emphasis On "We"
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2015/01/in-1984-dnc-inaugural-address-mario.html
"We can make it all the way with the whole family intact, the whole family on board... The failure - anywhere - to provide what reasonably we might to avoid pain is our failure."
Remembering Mario Cuomo
Andrew Cuomo once told me that I had “sort of a father and son relationship” with his father, Mario, who died Thursday at the age of 82. I’m not sure what he meant by that. Cuomo and I argued a lot, at length–but it was sportive arguing, a kind of dance. We once watched at entire New York Knicks game together on television—with the governor on the phone in Albany, me on the phone in New York. We spent the first half arguing politics; the second half talking sports. He favored a new rule: a five-point shot from half court or deeper.
MORE“Because the schools still [stink],” I replied. He was, of course, furious. He trusted me enough to get angry at me. He knew our conversations were private; he knew that I valued them too much to ever use them against him.
SEE MARIO CUOMO'S LIFE IN PICTURES
SEE MARIO CUOMO'S LIFE IN PICTURES
We disagreed about a lot of things, but I loved the fact that when it came to policy his first instinct was compassion. (Politics was another matter. He could be brutal toward his enemies.) One of those enemies once told me that Cuomo was “a Queens ward-heeler with the voice of Abraham Lincoln.” But that was unfair; Cuomo’s rhetorical brilliance was rooted in personal experience. His heart was always—always—with the workers “whose fingers are too thick to work a computer keyboard.” He was, indeed, old school outer-borough New York, my New York. He once asked me if I wanted to go to Japan with him on a trade mission and I said no. “Why not?” He asked, shocked. I told him that I knew exactly what he would do when he got there. He would go to his hotel room and spend six hours on the phone back to New York, go to a couple of trade meetings with Japanese officials, have a ceremonial dinner where he’d feel uncomfortable, get back on the plane and go home. “When I go to Japan,” I said. “I want to go to Japan.” He agreed that I had a point. I asked him why he was like that. “I grew up over the store,” he said. “I get nervous when I’m not close to the store.”
Which was why, I think, he never ran for President. He was afraid he’d get to Iowa and do something New York stupid, like mistake corn for wheat. He also, I suspect, felt that way about the Supreme Court, a position he was offered by Bill Clinton: he would have to compete with another smart Italian, Antonin Scalia, and might not be up to the job. He didn’t understand that his big heart, his basic instincts, his athletic cleverness, was exactly the moral challenge that Scalia needed.
Father and son? Well, we did have conversations of a personal quality that I’ve never had with a politician before or since. Just after Michael Dukakis lost the presidential campaign of 1988, I told Mario what an old Boston politician had once told me, “Dukakis was never like us”—he meant a working-class ethnic sort—”he was never ashamed of his father.”
I said it as a provocation. Cuomo had worked hard for Dukakis. But he didn’t flash back at me. He was silent for a while; I could feel his brain cranking. And then, finally, he said, “I used to hate going to parents’ night in school. My father couldn’t speak English. I was so embarrassed. I would try to keep him away from my friends.” He called me back three days later, having polled his inner circle—Fabian Palomino, Sandy Frucher, others—about whether they’d been ashamed of their fathers. “You sure hit a nerve with that one,” Frucher told me.
But I remember Mario best on the stump in the 1982 gubernatorial primary, running against Ed Koch—who was, like, 30 or so points ahead at the beginning of the race. Koch was hammering away on the death penalty. The polls said the people were for it, overwhelmingly. Koch was for it. Cuomo was against it.
But I remember Mario best on the stump in the 1982 gubernatorial primary, running against Ed Koch—who was, like, 30 or so points ahead at the beginning of the race. Koch was hammering away on the death penalty. The polls said the people were for it, overwhelmingly. Koch was for it. Cuomo was against it.
And Cuomo made it the central issue of his campaign. We went from town to town in upstate New York, just a few of us—all the press and smart money were with Koch at that point. Mario would hold town meetings, knowing viscerally that he could only win their votes if they knew what kind of man he was. And he needed the death penalty for that. If they didn’t ask him about it, he’d ask them, “Doesn’t anyone want to ask me about the death penalty?”
He would tell them whether they wanted to hear it or not. He would tell the story of how one of his daughters was accosted by a thug on the street in Queens who burned her breast with a cigarette. “Did I want to murder that guy? Absolutely. My son Andrew got into the car with a baseball bat, looking for the guy. I would have torn him apart with my bare hands if I’d ever found him … But would have that been the right thing? No. It would have been the barbaric thing to do. That’s what we have government for—to protect us from the barbaric side of human nature.” The state, as an exemplar of moral rectitude, had to abide by the commandment, “Thou shalt not kill.”
People would come up to him after the meetings and say, “I’m still not sure I agree with you on the death penalty, but I certainly respect your position.” In the end, they decided to vote for him. They voted for him because Mario Cuomo was a man to respect, a man who respected them well enough to tell them what they didn’t want to hear.
↧
Blue Hole, Titanium And Aluminum Confirm Drought As Cause Of Mayan Collapse
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
- Investigation of Belize's "Blue Hole" indicates drought did in Mayan civilization
- Mayan civilization peaked in middle of first millennium; cities were abandoned by end of era
- "When you have major droughts, you start to get famines and unrest," says researcher
(CNN) -- To scuba divers and tourists, Belize's famous "Blue Hole" underwater cave is a wonder, one of the "10 most amazing places on Earth," according to the Discovery Channel.
To scientists, it's something more: evidence of the drought that is suspected to have led to the demise of the Mayan civilization.
New research reinforces that theory, Rice University Earth scientist Andre Droxler told LiveScience.
The team drilled cores from the Blue Hole sinkhole and a nearby lagoon. They found that the ratio of titanium to aluminum changed in the ninth and 10th centuries, a period when the Mayan civilization in the Yucatan Peninsula went into decline. More titanium means that heavier rains were affecting the region, since the runoff from the area's volcanic rock is rich in the element.
But from about A.D. 800 to 1000, the ratio between the two elements was much smaller, indicating that there was much less rainfall.
"When you have major droughts, you start to get famines and unrest," Droxler said.
The Mayan civilization, noted for its advances in astronomy and agriculture (not to mention that calendar system that some believed prophesied world devastation on December 21, 2012), dominated the Yucatan in the first half of the first millennium A.D. But by 900, most of the civilization's cities, located in present-day Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras and southern Mexico, had been abandoned.
The question of why this happened has tantalized scientists and historians for decades.
The drought theory isn't new, but the findings of Droxler and his colleagues buttress other studies. In 2012, samples from a 2,000-year-old stalagmite also showed that drought had afflicted the region in the latter half of the first millennium A.D.
"The main finding was that a prolonged drought contributed to the collapse of Classic Mayan civilization," environmental archaeologistDouglas Kennett told LiveScience two years ago.
Droxler and his colleagues published their findings in Scientific Reports.
↧
Grandson Of Oscar Wilde Discovers Grandmother's Cause Of Death
The death of Constance Wilde - the wife of author Oscar - has been a mystery for more than a century but the author's grandson now claims she had undiagnosed multiple sclerosis
The Catholic Church Learns How To Love Oscar Wilde
Did Oscar Wilde's wife die of MS? Clue in medical records and letters
- Author's wife's death has been a mystery for more than a century
- Some suggested she caught syphilis from her famous husband
- But the writer's grandson has now uncovered her medical notes
- After examining the records, a doctor has diagnosed multiple sclerosis
- Condition was known at time, but Constance went to eccentric medics
The grandson of Oscar Wilde believes he has solved the mystery of how his grandmother met her end aged just 40 over a century ago.
Speculation over the sudden death of Constance Wilde had ranged from spinal damage after falling down some stairs or syphilis picked up from her husband. It was a tragic end to a tragic life.
Now, 116 years later, evidence suggests that she fell victim to eccentric medical practices and a botched operation after doctors misdiagnosed multiple sclerosis, although the condition was known by then.
Merlin Holland, whose grandfather wrote masterpieces including The Importance of Being Earnest and The Ballad of Reading Gaol, discovered medical evidence among family letters that his mother had not wanted to make public while she was alive.
He says: 'It's always been a question really. What did Constance really die of?'
Those letters bear crucial passages from which a doctor, Ashley H Robins, has been able to diagnose symptoms nowadays associated with multiple sclerosis.
Unable to walk, she suffered debilitating pain across her body, extreme headaches and fatigue, but the seriousness of her condition went unnoticed by her two doctors.
One of them was an unnamed German 'nerve doctor', who believed in treating patients with baths and electricity, and the other was an Italian, Luigi Maria Bossi, who somehow thought that neurological and mental illness could be cured with gynaecological operations.
Although Bossi had already conducted one operation which failed to improve her condition, Constance returned to him for a gynaecological procedure.
Days later, she became unconscious and died. Two decades later, he faced unrelated accusations of unethical behaviour and professional misconduct and – in a final irony in this tragic saga – he was shot dead in his consulting room in Milan by the jealous husband of a patient, who then fired at his wife before turning the gun on himself.
Constance's brother, Otho, was left devastated, but realised that any legal action was pointless because she had been convinced by Bossi that surgery would relieve her disabilities and enable her to lead a normal life.
Merlin Holland made the discovery after finding a set of medical notes of the writer's long-suffering wife
Her grandson said: 'Constance's London and Heidelberg doctors had warned her not to be coaxed into surgery, but she ignored their advice, confident that Bossi's treatment would rehabilitate her; instead it cost her her life.
'Ultimately, both Bossi and the hapless Constance met their ends tragically - he by the bullet of an assassin and she by the knife of an irresponsible surgeon.'
The Lancet, the leading medical journal, has taken the evidence seriously to publish a paper jointly written by Holland and Robins, a specialist at the University of Cape Town Medical School in South Africa.
Holland hopes that this will now dispel the 'Constance death speculations' and bring 'closure' for Constance, who died less than a year after her husband's release from prison.
She suffered enough. Having been virtually abandoned by her mother, following the death of her father - she and her brother were brought up by their grandfather – she married Wilde in 1884 and, after his imprisonment for homosexual acts in 1895, had to flee to Europe with their two boys.
She changed their surname to 'Holland', an ancestral family name, and eventually settled near Genoa.
The evidence emerged from around 130 letters written between Constance and her brother, between 1878 and her death.
Constance, who was played by Jennifer Ehle in the 1996 film Wilde, married the author (right) in 1884
In 1894, she wrote: 'I am alright when I don't walk.' A year later, her walking had deteriorated, but she had put her faith in Bossi who 'undertakes to make me quite well in six weeks and I shall be glad to be able to walk again'.
But by 1896, her condition had deteriorated further: 'I am lamer than ever and have almost given up hope of ever getting well again.'
Holland recalls that his mother 'didn't particularly want anyone to have access' to them, 'frightened of what, in an age of sensationalising everything, someone might do with them'.
The first generation out from the literary personality is often rather 'overprotective', he observes.
He notes that although biographers had mentioned a gynaecological operation, there were few details: 'People somehow never put two and two together and thought 'why is a gynaecologist operating on her spine?'
The letters reveal that Bossi removed fibroids, benign tumours, having 'totally wrongly diagnosed what was the matter with her', Holland said. 'In those days… it was an extremely dangerous operation.'
In closing this chapter of his grandmother's life, Holland said: 'I rather feel it will put Constance to rest, poor thing.'
He visited her grave this summer: 'We cannot go past Genoa without going and paying our respects to her. We went and put some flowers on her grave. Every time I go there, I feel she's rather alone in exile in Genoa.'
Today, by chance, would have been his grandmother's birthday.
↧