Quantcast
Channel: Pax on both houses
Viewing all 30150 articles
Browse latest View live

39% Of Americans Approve Ferguson Police; 52% Disapprove

$
0
0

Our Ferguson Divide Goes Beyond Race

E.J. Dionne

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ej-dionne-talking-past-each-other-on-race/2014/12/03/e4bd24f8-7b16-11e4-9a27-6fdbc612bff8_story.html

Excerpt:"A majority of Americans declined to give a blank check to the police. Overall, only 39 percent of Americans said they approved of how the police and other local authorities handled the protests in Ferguson, while 52 percent disapproved. African Americans overwhelmingly disapproved, but on this issue, a plurality of whites shared their view: Slightly more whites disapproved of police behavior (48 percent) than approved (41 percent)."

Good News! At Israel's MIT, Arab Women (and Men) Are Suddenly Thriving

$
0
0
Technion campus

Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
Here’s a little-told success story: Israeli Arabs, women in particular, have made huge strides over the past decade at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, better known as Israel’s answer to MIT. Among both men and women, Arabs’ share of the Technion student body is now equal to their share of the overall population, an impressive achievement considering that more than half of Israeli Arab children live below the nation’s official poverty line.
I spoke today with Yosef Jabareen, an Arab professor of urban planning who spearheads the Technion’s effort to recruit and graduate Arab students. He shared a recently updated report he’s done and explained what he called “a dramatic change” in outcomes for Arab students. “For me, as an Arab professor, it’s fantastic,” said Jabareen. He earned bachelor’s and master’s degrees at the Technion, completed his education in the U.S. with a master’s from Harvard and a Ph.D. from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (America’s answer to the Technion), then returned to his alma mater and five years ago was named assistant to the senior vice president for minorities.
Technion
In 2001, as this slide shows, Arabs accounted for only 11 percent of undergraduates at the Technion. The percentage rose steadily to 18 percent last year and jumped three percentage points more to 21 percent this year, which is the same as Arabs’ share of the population of Israel (not counting the West Bank or Gaza, of course). Jabareen says that in 1990 Arabs’ share of the student body was only 5 percent to 7 percent. So it’s at least tripled in a quarter-century.
Nearly as dramatic has been the surge in Arab female students, from 39 percent in 2003 to 48 percent in 2014. TechnionThose figures compare favorably with those of majority-Arab nations, Jabareen says. Arabs, male and female, aren’t just being admitted. They’re graduating. The dropout rate, which was 73 percent in the 1970s, has fallen to 20 percent, vs. a dropout rate of 12 percent for Jews at the Technion, Jabareen says.
My colleague Drake Bennett highlighted the success of Arab startups in Israel in a recent feature story. There’s a long way to go, though. Only about 1 percent of people working in high tech in Israel are Arabs, Jabareen says, adding, “This is very dangerous politically for the state and for the minority.” The outpouring of fresh Arab Technion grads should begin to change those numbers.
The Technion, based in the northern Israel city of Haifa, specializes in science, engineering, and medicine. It was founded in 1912, before the establishment of the state of Israel. It’s working with Cornell University to establish a graduate school for science and engineering and a tech incubator on New York City’s Roosevelt Island. The New York Times described the Technion in a headline as “Israel’s Hard Drive.”
How did Arabs manage to gain such a solid foothold at the Technion? One factor, says Jabareen, is a network of excellent private schools for Arabs. Many are run by Arab Christians but are open to Muslims as well. The Israeli government has provided funding to those schools based on attendance, similar to voucher systems in the U.S. Education is seen as a pathway out of poverty by many Arab Christians, says Jabareen.
Jewish philanthropists including Benny and Patsy Landa helped kick the Technion’s efforts into a higher gear about a decade ago, Jabareen says. Benny Landa, a Canadian-Israeli, is a digital-printing pioneer who with his wife founded the Landa Fund for Equal Opportunity Through Education. Other philanthropists have since made donations. The Higher Education Council of Israel added support as well, mostly over the past five years.
Jabareen says Arab students are given intensive lessons in Hebrew, English, math, and physics in a summer camp before they enroll in the Technion. As students, each has two advisers, one for academics and one for social and cultural matters. The advisers are top Arab students who are paid for their work. In February the Technion will launch a project encouraging female Arab students to start their own companies, inviting in grads who have already done so, Jabareen says. “I believe that this type of project will improve the condition and the status of the Arab women within the Arab society, when they become investors and developers and high-tech leaders. This is very important.”
Last summer was stressful for the Technion’s Arab student body because of fighting between Israel and the forces of Hamas in Gaza. One third-year Arab medical student got in trouble for a joke he posted on Facebook after three Jewish teens were kidnapped in the West Bank—an incident that helped spark the wider conflict. Jabareen said he canceled his plans for academic travel to Europe and the U.S. so he could stay close to campus and support the Arab students. “The Arab students behaved in the best, excellent way. During all the war they have been calm, calm completely.”
Coy_190
Coy is Bloomberg Businessweek's economics editor. His Twitter handle is @petercoy.


If You Want To Learn From War, Don't Start One

$
0
0
"Dead bodies and wasted money": How I learned firsthand the worst lesson of war
A photo of the author
"Bush's Toxic Legacy In Iraq"

Excerpt "Toxic Legacy"

 Since the Vietnam War, two lessons are as plain as potatoes. 

"You don't get involved in somebody else's Civil War." 
"And you don't start them." 
Forget either lesson and American soldiers come home in caskets having accomplished nothing. 
We owe our troops trustworthy guidance, not swashbuckle, bluster and monkey business chest-thumping.

“Dead bodies and wasted money”: 

How I learned firsthand the worst lesson of war

If you truly want to learn from a war, don’t start one. My unit learned how to survive -- we didn't become smarter

Recent revelations of colossal missteps in Afghanistan from Anand Gopal’s “No Good Men Among the Living“ combined with ISIL’S advance in Iraq have the few remaining Afghanistan and Iraq War optimists wondering what it is we should take away from these conflicts. I imagine thousands of bureaucrats and generals are asking the same question at the Pentagon, crustily ordering their multitudinous aides to compile relevant data and get back to them yesterday. This is for them, I would assume, a time for edifying soul-searching, a chance to become smarter, more resilient, to make, as they say, lemonade out of a whole lot of dead bodies and wasted tax dollars.
Before they go any further, I have a suggestion for them: stop. Let go of your mouse. Put away all the power points that trace the different tribal leaders we should bomb and the ones that we should give money to, as well as the older power points that give money to the ones we are now bombing and bomb the ones we are now giving money to. Pause, take a deep breath, and please acknowledge that wars, whether won or lost, do not make societies smarter, but stupider.
I spent most of my war driving circles around a city now controlled by a group called ISIL. The city is much in the news now, or at least it was for a month or so, not so much for its degradation, but for the way in which our seven-year multibillion-dollar investment suddenly collapsed. Worse yet, many of the people we fought to help, those we trusted most and gave the most money to, were the ones who welcomed ISIS, the ostensible enemy, into the city. So when Mosul fell, I too thought long and hard about lessons learned. Was it a lack of American troops? Nouri Al-Maliki? Iran? Inaction in Syria? I wanted to take a clear failure – I mean it doesn’t get much worse than having the city you tried to make stable and “Western” reduced to three hours of electricity a night and allowing women to go out only when needed – and hold a good old-fashioned after-action review. But it soon became clear to me that my after-action review would be more of the same. I would be flattering myself by thinking I learned much through my particular war; when in fact I lost much of what I had worked very hard to learn before going to war.
Don’t get me wrong. War most definitely encourages bountiful creative impulses in some. The list of killing contraptions invented for and during war probably rivals that of a comparable peacetime list. Just think of where we’d be if we didn’t learn how to make a tank and flamethrowers? Similarly, if you leave a determined unit on the battlefield long enough they will adapt to their particular enemy and use the resources they have to better advantage. My unit started to figure out how to fight more effectively the longer we fought. But this is not the same thing as learning. We did not become smarter. We survived. ISIL has also adapted through 10 years of war. If anyone has learned anything from war, it’s them. Call me a philistine, but I don’t really want to learn anything about war from them, and I have trouble believing their war experience has taught them anything of real value, though it has in some respects made them successful at war itself.
Westerners like to dignify war as we can with the resources that we have, to make it sound like a chess game or science project with ascertainable goals, well-delineated procedures and verifiable conclusions. We actually have war colleges and war diplomas. People study military science and take war-leadership classes. Yet what a country actually does while at war – whether that country is an advanced nation or medieval relic – is try to survive; and if the war is truly about survival they throw everything in their possession at the enemy, flailing arms desperately, chucking money, bullets, grenades and prayers in the hope that they hit something. And you know what? Sometimes they do. But it takes a peculiar leap of faith to take this for knowledge or expertise. It takes an even more precious naiveté to pay people for the wisdom derived from collective stupidity.
This, of course, hints at a deeper problem with recent American war experience. Our contemporary wars are not really about survival. They are optional, so we find ourselves in a ridiculous position of trying to give brute force an air of rationality, as if we were not invading a country but embarking on an epic social-science project.
Gopal’s book shocks us with the extent of the West’s failure in Afghanistan. Didn’t anyone know anything? Hadn’t they learned from the previous year and the year before that? Why didn’t we adjust course? But this shouldn’t be surprising. Once we invested a trillion dollars to build a nation through bombs, money and more bombs, we effectively undermined any pretense of understanding Afghanistan’s culture, history or nationality. What we knew or didn’t know about this or that tribal leader is ultimately unimportant. We gave up on knowledge when we went tried to bomb another world into our image, and no amount of after-action reviews, however nuanced and sophisticated, will take away from the fact that we have become stupider for having fought a war.
If you truly want to learn from a war, don’t start one. And if you have to have one, if it’s absolutely necessary, and is truly about life or death, about survival, at least be honest enough to know what you’re getting into – don’t hide behind a façade of reason, trumped-up justifications and supposedly sacrosanct lessons learned from past wars (which inevitably come to nothing in the next, just ask André Maginot). And for God’s sake, don’t go around acting as if past martial failures hold the seed of future victory. For if there is one thing that teaches countries and the people in them nothing at all, that makes them a little less reasonable, a little more hysterical and much less judicious, it’s war.
Michael Carson went to Mosul as a Bradley Platoon Leader in November 2006. He left Iraq in December 2007. He now writes at the Wrath Bearing Tree. 

Sen. Claire McCaskill: CIA Torture Report "Would Never Happen In China Or N. Korea"

$
0
0

McCaskill: CIA report 'would never happen in North Korea or China'


By Martin Matishak - 12/08/14 
The release of a report on CIA enhanced interrogations techniques "would never happen" in less open and accountable nations, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) said on Monday.

The assessment, which could be released as soon as Monday, “exposes what the world already knows, and that is that the United States engaged in torture,” McCaskill said during an interview with CBS.
 
“But my feeling about this is that this is a gut-check moment for our democracy. The world knows we tortured. But does the world know yet that we'll hold up our values and hold our government accountable?” she said.

McCaskill added that the report “would never happen in North Korea or China or Russia. But in the United States, we hold our government accountable. And I think that process is so important, so fundamental to our democracy that it's essential that this report comes out.”

She stressed that the White House and Congress must have authority over the CIA.

“Now, if this report doesn't come out, then we all need to get comfortable with the fact that in America, the CIA has no oversight,” McCaskill warned.

The report is the result of a probe by the Senate Intelligence Committee into the CIA’s enhanced interrogations during the George W. Bush administration.

The Obama administration and many within the intelligence community have been scrambling in advance of its pending release out of fear for potentially violent blowback around the world.

McCaskill, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the public would ultimately decide whether the report’s release is a “learning moment for us.”

She said the incoming panel chairman, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), himself a prisoner of war in Vietnam, has been “up front about how important it is that we get beyond this ever happening again in terms of using torture."

In addition, the report itself “will help us all understand whether or not the torture was effective," according to McCaskill.


"Here’s Why Hillary Would Be So Formidable In 2016," Washington Post

$
0
0

 December 8, 2014  
Hillary Clinton tops every top potential GOP presidential contender in the Bloomberg Politics poll released Monday. Another number in the poll may give an indication why she could make such a formidable 2016 opponent: She scores high on the qualities Americans prioritize when they size up presidential candidates.
The new poll tells the story. When given four candidate qualities and asked which is most important to them, 29 percent chose "shares your values"; 27 percent went with "has a vision for the future"; and 26 percent said "is a strong leader."
Coming in fourth with 15 percent is "cares about people like you."
In other words, the public is all over the place on this question. There is no one, dominant answer.
But take a look at how the public rates Clinton on the three most popular responses when pitted head to head against leading Republicans. She tops former Florida governor Jeb Bush, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Sens. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz on all fronts. (She also tops them on the question of who "cares about people like you.")
Take Paul, who is arguably the hottest name on the GOP side right now. The public rates Clinton better on "sharing your values" by a 49 percent to 36 percent margin. On "strong leader," she wins 52 percent to 34 percent. "Caring about people like you" tilts toward the former secretary of state 48 percent to 37 percent. And "vision for the future" is advantage Clinton, 48 percent to 38 percent.
The caveat to all this is that the question about which qualities people care about was not an open-ended one. So it's possible American prioritize other traits more -- and that Clinton is not winning on those traits.
Still, the qualities tested routinely come up as focal points in the presidential elections.
It's worth noting that as Clinton mulls a White House run, she has yet to fully -- or arguably even roughly -- spell out what her overarching campaign theme(s) would be or what her "vision for the Future" would look like, precisely.
But the fact that she already scores high on that question illustrates why she should not be underestimated.
Sean Sullivan has covered national politics for The Washington Post since 2012.


Mother Of Tamir Rice Calls For Criminal Convictions Of Cops Who Killed Her "Baby"

$
0
0

"Bad Black People." Why Bill O'Reilly Is Wrong Even When He's Right


Excerpt: "Rice said her 14-year-old daughter, who went to the scene after the shooting, was tackled, handcuffed and put in the back of a police car after the shooting."
Rice said her son was loved by every one. "He was a bright child and he had a promising future," she said.
CLEVELAND, Dec 8 (Reuters) - The mother of a 12-year-old Cleveland boy fatally shot by police last month broke her silence on Monday, saying the officers involved should be criminally convicted.
"I'm looking for a conviction for both of the officers," Samaria Rice, the mother of Tamir Rice, said on ABC's "Good Morning America" program.
"He was just a wonderful kid," she said. "He was my baby."
Tamir Rice, who was black, was shot in a Cleveland park while carrying what turned out to be a replica gun that typically fires plastic pellets. His death came at a time of heightened national scrutiny of police use of force, especially against African-Americans.
Rice's family filed a suit last week against the city of Cleveland and both Timothy Loehmann, the officer who shot Rice, and Frank Garmback, who was driving the car. Rice was shot on Nov. 22 less than two seconds after the police car pulled up beside the boy at a park.
The city has declined to comment on the lawsuit.
Rice sat with her attorney, Benjamin Crump, who has also represented the family of Michael Brown, the unarmed black teenager whose fatal shooting by police in Ferguson, Missouri, led to months of protests.
In the Brown case, as well as a New York case involving the death of a black man during an arrest, grand juries declined to indict the officers involved.
The Rice family has issued statements about the shooting in the past, but the ABC interview was the first time Rice's mother had spoken publicly. She also planned to speak to reporters in Cleveland later on Monday.
Asked what happened the day her son died, Rice said: "Two little boys came and knocked on my door ... and said police just shot your son twice in the stomach," Samaria said.
Rice said her 14-year-old daughter, who went to the scene after the shooting, was tackled, handcuffed and put in the back of a police car after the shooting.
Rice said her son was loved by every one. "He was a bright child and he had a promising future," she said.
Both officers involved in the shooting are on administrative leave and the shooting is being investigated by Cleveland authorities. The case will go to a grand jury for possible charges. (Reporting by Kim Palmer; Editing by Mary Wisniewski and Eric Beech)

Cooking As Therapy For Depression, Anxiety And Other Psychological Problems

$
0
0
Chef Patricia D'Alessio, right, discusses ingredients with a Newport Academy alumna who came back to visit her at the academy’s kitchen. Newport Academy, a treatment center for teens in Bethlehem, Conn., uses cooking lessons to help treat mental illness and addiction.ENLARGE
Chef Patricia D'Alessio, right, discusses ingredients with a Newport Academy alumna who came back to visit her at the academy’s kitchen. Newport Academy, a treatment center for teens in Bethlehem, Conn., uses cooking lessons to help treat mental illness and addiction. JESSICA HILL FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

"Food-Mood Connection"
NPR
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/07/food-mood-connection-how-you-eat-can.html
Many cooks know what a sanctuary the kitchen can be.
Now, some health-care clinics and counselors are using cooking or baking as therapy tools for people suffering from depression, anxiety and other mental-health problems.
The courses are often partly aimed at teaching healthy cooking and eating skills to people living tough, chaotic lives. Counselors say the classes also soothe stress, build self-esteem and curb negative thinking by focusing the mind on following a recipe. Often the courses are part of a larger treatment plan that can also including talk therapy or medication.
A Bethlehem, Conn., treatment center for teens uses cooking lessons to help treat mental illness and addiction. The head chef at the clinic, Newport Academy, runs the courses, teaching teens how to make healthier versions of their favorite foods, such as burgers or macaroni and cheese. The chef, Patricia D’Alessio, demonstrates techniques for tasks like chopping vegetables or making meat patties and has the teens follow along with their own ingredients.
The two-hour classes “got them to focus on something other than stressful emotions, or what was going on in their day,” Ms. D’Alessio says. “It redirects their thought process to focus them on the process of cooking.”
Newport Academy alumnae taste a sauce they seasoned as they prepare chicken parmigiana at the academy.ENLARGE
Newport Academy alumnae taste a sauce they seasoned as they prepare chicken parmigiana at the academy.JESSICA HILL FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Psychologists say cooking and baking are pursuits that fit a type of therapy known as behavioral activation. The goal is to alleviate depression by boosting positive activity, increasing goal-oriented behavior and curbing procrastination and passivity.
“If the activity is defined as personally rewarding or giving a sense of accomplishment or pleasure, or even seeing the pleasure of that pumpkin bread with chocolate chips making someone else happy, then it could improve a sense of well-being,” says Jacqueline Gollan, associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago.
Clinical studies on cooking’s therapeutic effects are hard to come by. But occupational therapists say cooking classes are particularly widely used in their profession, which seeks to help people with mental or physical disorders maintain their daily living and working skills.
In one study published in the British Journal of Occupational Therapy in 2004, researchers in the U.K. found that baking classes boosted confidence, increased concentration and provided a sense of achievement for 12 patients being treated in inpatient mental-health clinics. The patients took an average of two baking classes and were then interviewed to assess their reaction.
Annie Gendaszek, a counselor and program coordinator at Newport Academy, says the cooking courses are part of the clinic’s aim of getting teens “involved by doing.” Residents typically engage in several hours of talk therapy each day during their 45-day stays. That alone can stressful, Ms. Gendaszek says. Cooking is a fun activity where the teens “may not think they’re actually doing therapy,” she says.
Matthew Petrillo, a 17-year-old who took the classes as part of his depression treatment at the clinic this fall, deemed them “awesome.”
A Newport Academy alumna puts the finishing touches on a piece of chicken parmigiana prepared with Ms. D'Alessio.ENLARGE
A Newport Academy alumna puts the finishing touches on a piece of chicken parmigiana prepared with Ms. D'Alessio. JESSICA HILL FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
“Talking therapy was really going in-depth with why we are here,” he said. Being in the kitchen “wasn’t all focused on why we’re here, but on getting better and boosting confidence and self-esteem and skills.”
Some cookbooks in recent years have addressed the therapeutic pull of the kitchen. John Whaite, a baker who in 2012 won “The Great British Bake Off,” a popular U.K. television show, published a cookbook that talks about his history of depression, and how he uses baking to comfort himself. In 2012, Irish novelist Marian Keyes published “Saved by Cake,” which describes how baking helped her cope with a bad bout of depression.
Sam Smith, a 42-year-old primary-school teacher in northern England, says she devoured Ms. Keyes’s book after spotting it at a grocery store. She, too, had turned to baking after developing postpartum depression, and found it a lifesaver. She threw herself into making decorated cookies, churning out confections in the shape of butterflies, Christmas ornaments and the cartoon character Thomas the Tank Engine. She snapped up cookie cutters at baking shops and on eBay . “I ended up with a whole shelf full,” she says.
One problem: All that baking made her gain 25 pounds. There were only so many school bake sales or children’s birthday parties she could send her creations to. “It boosted my confidence. And I felt it relaxed me, as well,” she says. But for the sake of her waistline, she says she is trying to cut back a bit.
Therapists say anyone developing a regular cooking habit is wise to stick to healthy recipes, particularly since depression and other mood disorders can cause weight gain. Catana Brown, an occupational therapist in Glendale, Ariz., says she and others in the profession emphasize healthy recipes and portion control when using cooking as a therapy tool.
“It’s a huge issue, not only because of obesity, but because a lot of [depression] medications that people take tend to be associated with weight gain,” she says. She ran a weekly cafe for many years in Kansas City, Kan., that invited people with mental illness to cook and serve food to others in the community. She had them make healthy versions of foods like gumbo and always included a vegetable or salad dish. “A lot of times when people cook, they eat less high-calorie stuff, because they’re eating less fast food,” she says.
If possible, sharing the cooking and eating process with others can be extra helpful, therapists say. Some people with mental illness feel socially isolated, so having an excuse to be in the kitchen or around a table with others can boost social skills and confidence, says Helen Tafoya, clinical manager of a psychosocial rehabilitation program at the University of New Mexico Psychiatric Center in Albuquerque. The outpatient program runs cooking classes for local people with schizophrenia, depression and other illnesses.
Ms. Tafoya, a clinical counselor, says preparing and sharing food with others is therapeutic because it’s central to who we are as human beings. “The ability to eat and share food is very, very primal,” she says. “Eating or breaking bread with someone has healing capacities beyond anything that we can really quantify.”
Write to Jeanne Whalen at Jeanne.Whalen@wsj.com

Emerson: Why Philosophy Is Inescapably Fundamental

$
0
0

The sequel to shoddy thought is shoddy everything.




Ralph Waldo Emerson's Eye-Popping Appraisal Of Conservatives

$
0
0
Ralph Waldo Emerson

"All conservatives are such from personal defects. They have been effeminated by position of nature, born halt and blind, through luxury of their parents, and can only, like invalids, act on the defensive." 
Ralph Waldo Emerson




George McGovern: "The Case For Liberalism, A Defense Of The Future Against The Past"



"American Conservatives And Oppositional-Defiant Disorder"

"Are Republicans Insane?"

"The Republican Party Is A Satanic Cult"

Jindal Criticizes The Stupid Party: "Simply protects the rich so they get to keep their toys"

"The Reign of Morons Is Here," Charles P. Pierce, The Atlantic

"A Southerner Explains Tea Party Radicalism: The Civil War Is Not Over"

"People Who Watch Only Fox News 
Know Less Than People Who Watch No News"

Bill Maher: The Zombie Life Cycle Of Republican Lies. They Never - Ever - Die




Antarctic Glacial Melt Up 3 Fold In Ten Years. A Mt. Everest Of Water Every 2 Years

$
0
0
Disappearing: The melting Thwaites Glacier in west Antarctica is projected to raise global sea levels by nearly 60 centimetres over coming centuries.
Disappearing: The melting Thwaites Glacier in west Antarctica is projected to raise global sea levels by nearly 60 centimetres over coming centuries.

Key glaciers in Antarctica haemorrhage ice as temperatures rise


Glaciers in west Antarctica are melting so quickly they are losing the equivalent of a Mount Everest of ice every two years, a peer reviewed study has found.
The increasing pace of melting means the glaciers have haemorrhaged an average 83 billion tonnes into the Amundsen Sea annually over the past 21 years.
Accepted for publication in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, the study used four sets of satellite measurements to determine ice loss in the Amundsen Sea embayment from 1992 to 2013.
"The mass loss of these glaciers is increasing at an amazing rate," said study co-author Isabella Velicogna, a scientists with the University of California and NASA.
This remote and uninhabited region is now under a scientific spotlight similar to that which previously fell on the Antarctic Peninsula, where floating sea ice shelves broke up dramatically more than a decade ago. The floating Larsen B ice shelf - which was bigger than the Australian Capital Territory - fell apart in a month in 2002. A study published in the journal Science this year found that collapse was due to rising air temperatures and rainfall.
While the loss of the Larsen B floating peninsula made no difference to sea level - it was the equivalent to an ice cube melting in a glass of water - the loss of the Amundsen Sea glaciers will raise it.
A separate Science study this year found the west Antarctic ice sheet had gone into an irreversible retreat.
Glaciologist Eric Rignot, of the University of California, said melting of the sheet would raise the sea level by 1.2 metres over the next two centuries.
"This retreat will have major consequences for sea level rise worldwide," Professor Rignot said.
The latest study came as the World Meteorological Organisation last week told the United Nations' climate talks in Peru that 2014 was on track to be hottest year on record.
Scientists say the most concerning melting glacier in west Antarctica is the giant Pine Island glacier, which has an enormous drainage area not held back from the sea by a floating shelf. It has been thinning and retreating for 40 years and, according to a study published in Nature Climate Change, is projected to add 3.5 to 10 millimetres of sea level rise over 20 years.
The nearby Thwaites Glacier also appears to be in the early stages of a collapse due to warmer water melting its underside. Scientists say it could add up to 60 centimetres to global sea level over centuries.
While west Antarctic ice is rapidly retreating, the larger east Antarctic ice sheet - mostly grounded on rock above sea level - may be gaining mass through increased snowfall. The recent fifth assessment report by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found the loss of ice in the west was outpacing the growth in the east.
Scientists say that predicting glacier and ice sheet behaviour is the least certain component when making projections about future sea level rise.


9 Years And 3 Billion Miles Away, "New Horizons" Space Probe Awakes

$
0
0
New Horizons Space Probe


Nearly 3 billion miles away, a space probe awakes

NASA's New Horizons space probe has successfully woken up from hibernation as it closes in on Pluto and its satellites.

By Sen 

Sen—NASA’s fastest space probe ever launched to the outer Solar System,New Horizons, has woken successfully from hibernation as it closes in on target Pluto.
Mission controllers confirmed early today that the spacecraft had switched to active mode, in preparation for its fly past the former planet and its moons on 14 July, 2015.
It took four hours and 26 minutes for the signal to travel more than 2.9 billion miles (4.7 billion km) back to Earth to confirm that the probe was alive. It was picked up by NASA’s Deep Space Network station in Canberra, Australia. 
Recommended: Are you scientifically literate? Take our quiz
After a nine year voyage, this is the farthest any space mission has traveled to reach its primary target.
Operators at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory confirmed at 9:53 p.m. (EST) ) 02:53 (UTC) that New Horizons, had switched from hibernation to active mode, as its pre-programmed computer commands instructed.
Alan Stern, New Horizons principal investigator from Southwest Research Institute, commented: “This is a watershed event that signals the end of New Horizons crossing of a vast ocean of space to the very frontier of our Solar System, and the beginning of the mission’s primary objective: the exploration of Pluto and its many moons in 2015.”
Launched on January 19, 2006, New Horizons has spent about two-thirds of its flight time, 1,873 days, in hibernation. Its 18 separate hibernation periods, from mid-2007 to late 2014, ranged from 36 days to 202 days in length. 
During hibernation mode, much of the New Horizons spacecraft was unpowered. The onboard flight computer monitored system health and broadcast a weekly beacon-status tone back to Earth. 
The wake-up sequence started aboard the spacecraft at 3 p.m. EST (08:00 UTC) on 6 December. About 90 minutes later, New Horizons began transmitting word to Earth on its condition, including the report that it is back in active mode. 
As part of the wake-up, NASA broadcast a special version of Where My Heart Will Take Me, by English tenor Russell Watson, which included a greeting to New Horizons from the singer.
The next few weeks will be used to check that the spacecraft's systems and science instruments are operating properly, and to build and test the computer-command sequences that will guide New Horizons through its flight to and reconnaissance of the Pluto system. 
The seven-instrument science payload includes advanced imaging infrared and ultraviolet spectrometers, a compact multicolor camera, a high-resolution telescopic camera, two powerful particle spectrometers and a space-dust detector. New Horizons will begin observing the Pluto system on 15 January. Closest approach to Pluto will occur on 14 July.
“New Horizons is on a journey to a new class of planets we’ve never seen, in a place we’ve never been before,” said New Horizons Project Scientist Hal Weaver, of APL. “For decades we thought Pluto was this odd little body on the planetary outskirts; now we know it’s really a gateway to an entire region of new worlds in the Kuiper Belt, and New Horizons is going to provide the first close-up look at them.”
Related Links:


McDonalds May Be In Permanent Decline

$
0
0

Americans are not lovin’ McDonald’s—and haven’t been for years

Each time McDonald's announces how much money it's making, the company is forced to share an embarrassing truth: Americans are eating less and less of its hamburgers, chicken nuggets, and french fries.
The most recent example came this morning, when the global hamburger giant posted earnings for November, and announced that its same-store sales (those open for at least 13 months) had once again fallen steeply in the United States—this time by nearly 5 percent. It's the thirteenth straight month that same-store sales fell in the United States.
McDonald's inability to reverse its struggles in what is still the fast food behemoths's largest market has left the company scrambling. But instead of fixing problems, the company produced a decidedly ineffective strategy, which appears to be the result of a misunderstanding of why and when people purchase food at the eatery's more than 14,000 outlets in the United States.
In a detailed discussion of the company's conundrum, Fortune describes the approach McDonald's has chosen as a "barbell strategy," in which the fast food company has doubled down on its cheaper options (often dollar menu items) while also marketing healthier or higher quality—and thus more expensive—offerings.
The problem is that McDonald's more expensive items are getting too expensive. A Big Mac now costs nearly $5, or roughly twice what it cost in 2002. That price point is likely untenable for the company, since it nearly touches those offered by higher-end chains. The result appears to be the migration of McDonald's customers, Fortune notes.
 As the premium products creep closer to the pricing of restaurants like Panera Bread and Chipotle—a relatively new class of eatery labeled “fast casual”—and even approach designer burger joints like Shake Shack and Five Guys, McDonald’s risks losing customers.
Indeed, food companies like Chipotle, which charge a bit extra for the promise of better ingredients have found a huge and growing customer base. Even the Federal Reserve has acknowledged the trend. "Restaurant sales climbed, especially in the quick-service segment. Consumers shifted away from hamburgers, towards chicken, pizza, and Mexican food," the bank said in its most recent Beige Book Report.
But McDonald's problems aren't merely coming from a misplaced bet that Americans are willing to trade a five dollar bill for a Big Mac when they can spend a comparable amount and consume a better regarded burger (McDonald's hamburgers, mind you, are among consumers' least favorite, according to a recent study by Consumer Reports). The company has introduced initiatives promoting cheapness, like the "Dollar Menu & More," which launched in late 2012, and included items like the Bacon McDouble. But the focus on affordability hasn't panned out either.
The company's response to the disappointing results appears to be more of a doubling down than a backing away.
"Today's consumers increasingly demand more choice, convenience and value in their dining-out experience," Don Thompson, McDonald's President and Chief Executive Officer, said in a statement. "We are working to bring the McDonald's Experience of the Future to life for our customers to better deliver against these evolving expectations."
If the company's latest change is any indication, the experience of McDonald's down the road might look a lot more like what you can get at Chipotle now. The company announced on Monday a plan to test a new "Create Your Taste" program, which will allow patrons in some 2,000 restaurants around the country to build their own hamburgers. No burritos—yet.


Roberto A. Ferdman is a reporter for Wonkblog covering food, economics, immigration and other things. He was previously a staff writer at Quartz.


Fox News: Obama Seeks Advice On Establishing Monarchy

$
0
0
 

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—President Barack Obama spent several hours on Monday in a closed-door Oval Office meeting seeking advice on how to establish a monarchy, Fox News reports.
According to Fox, the President peppered his Oval Office guest with detailed questions about the mechanics of setting up a monarchy and was curious about the perks and powers that go along with it.

Obama’s guest advised him that establishing a monarchy would probably require rewriting or even replacing the Constitution, an option that Obama reportedly said would be “difficult, but doable.”
Introducing a note of caution, the guest urged the President to alter the Constitution so that it vested the monarch with genuine power, adding, “You don’t want to wind up being a figurehead who just goes around visiting foreign dignitaries and so forth.”
According to the Fox report, the President came away “intrigued” by the meeting and said he would explore the idea further next week when Congress is on vacation.

9 Surprising Facts About Flatulence. (#10. Hitler Was Clinically Flatulent)

$
0
0
Whether you try to hide it or not, you fart. Everybody does.
But even though it's such a routine activity — the average person farts between 10 and 20 times per day — there's a lot about farting that you might not know.
As part of research into the microbiome — the rich community of bacteria that live throughout your body — scientists have learned all sorts of interesting things about the bacteria that produce gas inside your intestines. Here are 9 crucial things to know about flatulence.

1) You produce about 500 to 1500 milliliters of gas per day, and expel it in 10 to 20 farts


This might be more than you'd expect, but it's been measured in controlled studies. The surprisingly hefty amount is the result of bacteria that live in your colon and feed on most of the food you eat, says Purna Kashyap — a gastroenterologist at the Mayo Clinic who studies the gut microbiome.
"There are a lot of carbohydrates that we consume — mainly present in vegetables, grains, and fruits — that our bodies don't have the enzymes necessary to digest," he says. "These end up in large intestine, where microbes chew them apart and use them for energy, through the process of fermentation. As a byproduct, they produce gas."
A huge variety of foods contain these complex carbs that we can't fully digest: virtually all beans, most vegetables, and anything with whole grains. For most people, this leads to somewhere between 500 to 1500 milliliters of gas daily — the equivalent of half a two-liter bottle of soda, every single day.

2) 99 percent of the gas you produce does not smell

One of the reasons that we produce so much more gas than we realize is that nearly all of it is odorless.
Hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and methane make up as much as 99 percent of the gas produced in our large intestines by volume. (They're supplemented by air you swallow — more on that below.) All of these gases are odorless, which is why much of the time, farts don't actually smell at all.
The potent stink, research has found, is largely due to the 1 percent or so of compounds with sulfur in them, such as hydrogen sulfide. (This sort of research itself is pretty amazing: one experiment involved two people judging the smelliness of farts of 16 participants who'd been fed pinto beans, collected with the aid of "gas-tight Mylar pantaloons.")
beans
Caution: these contain sulfur. (Shutterstock.com)
Bacteria need to consume sulfur to produce sulfurous gases, and though not all foods with complex carbs contain sulfur, many do. They're mainly foods that you probably already associate with farting — things like beans, onions, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, broccoli, and dairy.

3) Gum and soda can make you fart more

coke can
Apart from the gases produced by bacteria, a significant proportion of your flatulence is simply made up of inadvertently swallowed air. It doesn't smell — it's mostly nitrogen and oxygen — but it sounds and feels the same coming out.
Some of this swallowing goes on while you're asleep, but it can be increased by drinking carbonated beverages (after all, you're ingesting the carbonation) and by chewing gum.

4) Farting is the result of a healthy, complex ecosystem in your intestines

gut bacteria 2
Bacteroides fragilis, one of the bacteria species involved in gas production, cultured in a petri dish. (Nathan Reading)
Modern society views flatulence as a negative. This is unfortunate, because in most cases, it's the byproduct of a beautiful thing — the intricate ecosystem of bacteria living in your intestines.
"It's a complex ecology, with various organisms coexisting and thriving," Kashyap says. "When a complex carbohydrate reaches your colon, some bacteria will break it down first, and then some of their byproducts will feed other bacteria. The whole community benefits from a single carbohydrate that you consume."
What's more, you also benefit. Scientists are still unraveling the role of the microbiome in digestion, but it's known that the same bacteria that produce gas also generate vitamins and fatty acids that help maintain our colon lining, and may support our immune systems.

5) There's a simple reason why you don't mind the smell of your own farts


As this AsapScience video explains, experiments have confirmed that we find the smell of our own farts less offensive than others'.
The reason: we become habituated to all smells over time. That's why you might notice a scent walking into a stranger's house, but seldom do for your own.
It's also why you become habituated to the characteristic mix of odors produced by the bacteria inside your own body, which differs slightly from everyone else's. As a result, your own farts just don't have the same impact on you — even though they're just as pungent for everyone else.

6) Yes, you can light a fart on fire

Because flatulence is partly composed of flammable gases like methane and hydrogen, it can be briefly set on fire.
We don't recommend it, because of the risk of injury, but if you have to see it, there are plenty of examples here.

7) No, you can't hold a fart in until it disappears

whoopie cushion 2
This might seem obvious, but for whatever reason, people wonder about this question. At times, after holding in a fart for a while for social reasons, it can seem to disappear.
However, this isn't actually possible. It might seem to vanish because you stop being conscious of it, and it leaks out gradually, but the physics of flatulence are pretty straightforward. A fart is a bubble of gas, and there's ultimately nowhere for it to go besides out of your anus.

8) Beano cuts down on gas production by starving these bacteria

In case you're wondering, the over-the-counter product Beano — which claims to "prevent gas before it occurs"— actually works as advertised. Two different controlled trials have found that it significantly reduces gas production in the hours following a bean-filled meal.
The way it works is pretty simple: the pills contain an enzyme called alpha-galactosidase that cuts complex carbohydrates into shorter, simpler carbs that are much easier to digest. As a result, they get broken down in your small intestine, rather than making it all the way to the large intestine, where bacteria would ferment them, producing gas.
However, there's a drawback to habitually taking Beano to prevent gas.

9) Starving your fart-producing bacteria is not a good idea

gut bacteria
Bacteroides fragilis, one of the bacteria species involved in gas production. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
For most people, actively trying to limit your gas production isn't necessary, Kaskyap says. The amount you produce is the result of both your balance of gut bacteria and diet, and unless you're experiencing other sorts of problems — such as painful bloating — it's not wise to mess with it.
"The knee-jerk reaction, for many people, is to stop eating things that produce gas," he says. "But these foods, which have complex carbohydrates, are nutrition for the bacteria in our gut. You don't want to starve them unless there's a good reason."
Additionally, he notes, many people who believe they suffer from excessive gas production actually just have trouble with the flow of that gas through their intestines, perhaps due to constipation. Or, they might make the same amount of gas but emit it more frequently, in smaller doses. In either case, Kashyap says, "by changing your diet, you're not solving the problem and may in fact be harming yourself."
Of course, there are exceptions here: if you produce truly excessive amounts of gas or experience painful bloating, it could be a sign of a problem — such as lactose intolerance — and you may want to see a doctor.

Tom Toles Cartoon: Toxic Denial, Opposition, Intolerance And Impatience

$
0
0
"All conservatives are such from personal defects. They have been effeminated by position of nature, born halt and blind, through luxury of their parents, and can only, like invalids, act on the defensive." 
Ralph Waldo Emerson

"American Conservatives And Oppositional-Defiant Disorder"

"Are Republicans Insane?"

"The Republican Party Is A Satanic Cult"

Jindal Criticizes The Stupid Party: "Simply protects the rich so they get to keep their toys"

"The Reign of Morons Is Here," Charles P. Pierce, The Atlantic

"A Southerner Explains Tea Party Radicalism: The Civil War Is Not Over"

"People Who Watch Only Fox News 
Know Less Than People Who Watch No News"

Bill Maher: The Zombie Life Cycle Of Republican Lies. They Never - Ever - Die

George McGovern: "The Case For Liberalism, A Defense Of The Future Against The Past"




"Waterboarding’s Role In Identifying A Terrorist," by Mark Theissen

$
0
0
Never do American conservatives consider that they will, as night follows day, become what they practice -- dirty, tricky people.

  December 8, 2014


Before outgoing Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) releases her $40 million partisan report claiming that nothing of value came from CIA interrogations, she might want to save herself some embarrassment and make a few last-minute edits. Over the weekend, Pakistani forces killed the man who was believed to be al-Qaeda’s top operational commander, Adnan el Shukrijumah — a terrorist who was identified thanks to the CIA’s interrogation of two senior al-Qaeda operatives.
The Post reported Saturday that “the FBI launched a global manhunt for Shukrijumah in 2003, offering a $5 million reward for information leading to his arrest. U.S. officials at the time described him as an ‘imminent threat to U.S. citizens and interests.’ ”
Well, how did the FBI know that (a) Shukrijumah existed, and that (b) he posed an “imminent threat” to the United States? Answer: CIA interrogations.
On March 28, 2002, the CIA captured its first senior al-Qaeda operative, Zayn al-Abidin Muhammed Hussein, better known as Abu Zubaida, in a pre-dawn raid in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Abu Zubaida was critically wounded in the raid and taken to the first CIA “black site.” While still recovering, he was initially questioned by the FBI and offered up some information he thought the FBI already knew. But as he grew stronger, Abu Zubaida became increasingly defiant and evasive. He declared his hatred of the United States and refused to answer further questions. So the CIA took charge of Abu Zubaida’s interrogation and began to apply the first proto-enhanced interrogation techniques, which included forced nudity, exposure to cold temperatures and sleep deprivation. It was under these circumstances (but before his waterboarding was approved in August) that Abu Zubaida provided information on a terrorist code-named “Abdullah al-Muhajir,” whom he identified as an American with a Latino name. This terrorist, subsequently identified as Jose Padilla, was captured thanks to information provided by Abu Zubaida. FBI agent Ali Soufan tried to take credit for getting this information, but according to the Justice Department’s Inspector General, Soufan’s own FBI partner, “Agent Gibson,” confirmed that Abu Zubaida “gave up” Padilla “during the CIA interrogations.”
Padilla had trained at an al-Qaeda camp in Kandahar with another terrorist who went by the code name “Jafar al-Tayyar,” or “Jafar the Pilot.” Together, Padilla and “Jafar” had learned the use of explosives and techniques for how to bring down a high-rise building. In May 2002, the CIA asked Abu Zubaida whom al-Qaeda would pick to lead the next big attack on the United States, and Abu Zubaida told them it was “Jafar.”
But the CIA still did not know the real name or identity of “Jafar.”
Then, in March 2003, the CIA captured Khalid Sheik Mohammed, or KSM, as he is known. When KSM was first taken into custody, he was defiant and refused to provide any information about future attacks, telling his questioners scornfully, “Soon, you will know.” But after undergoing enhanced interrogation, including waterboarding, KSM became a font of information. He told the CIA about active al-Qaeda plots to launch attacks against the United States and other Western targets. He drew charts of al-Qaeda’s operating structure, financing, communications and logistics. He revealed al-Qaeda travel routes and safe havens, identified voices in intercepted telephone calls, and helped intelligence officers make sense of documents and computer records seized in terrorist raids. And he provided the names of many of his top operatives.
Three weeks after his capture, KSM identified one of those operatives, “Jafar the pilot,” as Adnan el Shukrijumah — leading the FBI to issue the first BOLO (“Be on the Lookout”) alert for Shukrijumah. Media reports at the time described Shukrijumah as the “next Mohamed Atta,” because he had lived in the United States for several years and was believed to have been “anointed the head of a new cell with orders to attack targets inside the United States” — all information that came thanks to KSM’s identification. While Shukrijumah was never captured, the alert and manhunt that followed KSM’s revelation undoubtedly set back his plans to conduct follow-on attacks. A U.S. intelligence official told U.S. News & World Report at the time that KSM’s information was critical to identifying Shukrijumah, declaring, “We can’t possibly overstate the value that [KSM] has been to us.”
It has obviously been many years since CIA officials extracted those initial leads from Abu Zubaida and KSM, and a lot of intelligence work went into tracking down Shukrijumah. But it was CIA interrogations — including waterboarding — that made it possible for the agency to identify and target him in the first place.
That presents a problem for Feinstein and her wishful conclusion that nothing of value came from the CIA’s interrogations. Secretary of State John Kerry reportedly called Feinstein last week, asking her to delay the release of her report, because releasing it at such a sensitive time posed an unacceptable risk to U.S. personnel and facilities abroad. She’d be wise to take his advice. It would provide a face-saving excuse for why she can’t defend the assertion that CIA interrogations played no role in the identification of Adnan el Shukrijumah.

The CIA's First Detainee Spent 266 Days In A Box The Size Of A Coffin

$
0
0
The CIA's first detainee spent 266 days confined in a box the size of a coffin. 

America, the Beautiful

America
Making the world a better, safer place



"Cheney Calls For International Ban On Torture Reports"

"The Iraqi Liar Who Started The War. Let's Torture Willing Informants To Get The Truth?
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-iraqi-liar-who-started-war-torture.html

Full Text Of John McCain's Torture Address From Senate Floor
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/full-text-of-john-mccains-anti-torture.html

"The CIA's First Detainee Spent 266 Days In A Box The Size Of A Coffin"
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-cias-first-detainee-spent-266-days.html

Water Boarding: A Clear Explanation
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/water-boarding-clear-explanation.html
"Torture Report Articles (Great Wonkblog Compendium)
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/torture-report-articles-great-wonkblog.html

CIA Torture Report: 'Torture Is A Crime And Those Responsible Must Be Tried'
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/cia-torture-report-torture-is-crime-and.html

Cheney's Lucid 1994 Rationale For NOT Invading Iraq. 
Conservatives "Must" See This
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/08/cheneys-lucid-1996-rationale-for-not.html

"Bush's Toxic Legacy In Iraq"


Water Boarding: A Clear Explanation

$
0
0

During waterboarding, water fills a subject's nose, mouth, and throat, and the subject cannot breathe. The subject does not drown, however, because his upper body is inclined toward his head and the water does not reach his lungs. The Washington Post.




The United States Convicted Japanese Soldiers For The Crime Of Waterboarding
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/02/AR2007110201170.html

As a tool for extracting dependable information, waterboarding didn't work.

"The Dime-A-Dozen Liar Who Pimped Uncle Sam To Invade Iraq"







Cheney's Lucid 1994 Rationale For NOT Invading Iraq. Conservatives "Must" See This
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/08/cheneys-lucid-1996-rationale-for-not.html

"Bush's Toxic Legacy In Iraq"

"Cheney Calls For International Ban On Torture Reports"

"The Iraqi Liar Who Started The War. Let's Torture Willing Informants To Get The Truth?
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-iraqi-liar-who-started-war-torture.html

Full Text Of John McCain's Torture Address From Senate Floor
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/full-text-of-john-mccains-anti-torture.html

"The CIA's First Detainee Spent 266 Days In A Box The Size Of A Coffin"
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-cias-first-detainee-spent-266-days.html

Water Boarding: A Clear Explanation
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/water-boarding-clear-explanation.html
"Torture Report Articles (Great Wonkblog Compendium)

The Iraqi Liar Who Started The War. Is It Time To Torture ALL Informants?

$
0
0

The Dime-A-Dozen Liar Who Pimped Uncle Sam To Invade Iraq

The common thief and Mickey Mouse liar whose crock of shit started The Iraq War.

If the "intelligence" community gets sucker-punched by rinky-dink a-holes like this guy,
maybe America would be better off torturing ALL informants.

If torture works, waterboarding this hijue puta would have prevented The Iraq War
the rise of ISIS, and the radical destabilization of The Middle East.

Alan: Imagine the "truths" Curveball would have "confessed" if tortured by people wanting to hear lies. 

Why is there NO discussion about preventing such tragic nonsense in future?

As a nation, are we so belligerent - so irrepressibly horny to ejaculate fire, shrapnel and lead -- that we resort to nonsensical lies to propel our headlong rush to war?

Hear this. 

There is NO difference between the f-wad above and any other under-performing thief trying to save his skin by telling ideological bamboozlers "the lies they need" to perp their scam.

Read Curveball's Wikipedia account... and weep.

Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi, aka "Curveball"

Teach your children that Uncle Sam is a bloody warmonger and - judging from America's experience in Vietnam and Iraq -- should be presumed guilty until proven innocent. 


Cheney's Lucid 1994 Rationale For NOT Invading Iraq. Conservatives "Must" See This

"Bush's Toxic Legacy In Iraq"


Excerpt: "Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi, code-named Curveball by German and American intelligence officials who dealt with his claims, has told the Guardian that he fabricated tales of mobile bioweapons trucks and clandestine factories in an attempt to bring down the Saddam Hussein regime, from which he had fled in 1995... "I tell you something when I hear anybody – not just in Iraq but in any war – [is] killed, I am very sad. But give me another solution. Can you give me another solution? Believe me, there was no other way to bring about freedom to Iraq. There were no other possibilities.""

Defector Admits To Lies That Triggered Iraq 

The defector who convinced the White House that Iraq had a secret biological weapons programme has admitted for the first time that he lied about his story, then watched in shock as it was used to justify the war.
Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi, codenamed Curveball by German and American intelligence officials who dealt with his claims, has told the Guardian that he fabricated tales of mobile bioweapons trucks and clandestine factories in an attempt to bring down the Saddam Hussein regime, from which he had fled in 1995.
"Maybe I was right, maybe I was not right," he said. "They gave me this chance. I had the chance to fabricate something to topple the regime. I and my sons are proud of that and we are proud that we were the reason to give Iraq the margin of democracy."
The admission comes just after the eighth anniversary of Colin Powell's speech to the United Nations in which the then-US secretary of state relied heavily on lies that Janabi had told the German secret service, the BND. It also follows the release of former defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld's memoirs, in which he admitted Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction programme, 
The careers of both men were seriously damaged by their use of Janabi's claims, which he now says could have been – and were – discredited well before Powell's landmark speech to the UN on 5 February 2003.
The former CIA chief in Europe Tyler Drumheller describes Janabi's admission as "fascinating", and said the emergence of the truth "makes me feel better". "I think there are still a number of people who still thought there was something in that. Even now," said Drumheller.
In the only other at length interview Janabi has given he denied all knowledge of his supposed role in helping the US build a case for invading Saddam's Iraq.
In a series of meetings with the Guardian in Germany where he has been granted asylum, he said he had told a German official, who he identified as Dr Paul, about mobile bioweapons trucks throughout 2000. He said the BND had identified him as a Baghdad-trained chemical engineer and approached him shortly after 13 March of that year, looking for inside information about Saddam's Iraq.
"I had a problem with the Saddam regime," he said. "I wanted to get rid of him and now I had this chance."
He portrays the BND as gullible and so eager to tease details from him that they gave him a Perry's Chemical Engineering Handbook to help communicate. He still has the book in his small, rented flat in Karlsruhe, south-west Germany.
"They were asking me about pumps for filtration, how to make detergent after the reaction," he said. "Any engineer who studied in this field can explain or answer any question they asked."
Janabi claimed he was first exposed as a liar as early as mid-2000, when the BND travelled to a Gulf city, believed to be Dubai, to speak with his former boss at the Military Industries Commission in Iraq, Dr Bassil Latif.
The Guardian has learned separately that British intelligence officials were at that meeting, investigating a claim made by Janabi that Latif's son, who was studying in Britain, was procuring weapons for Saddam.
That claim was proven false, and Latif strongly denied Janabi's claim of mobile bioweapons trucks and another allegation that 12 people had died during an accident at a secret bioweapons facility in south-east Baghdad.
The German officials returned to confront him with Latif's version. "He says, 'There are no trucks,' and I say, 'OK, when [Latif says] there no trucks then [there are none],'" Janabi recalled.
He said the BND did not contact him again until the end of May 2002. But he said it soon became clear that he was still being taken seriously.
He claimed the officials gave him an incentive to speak by implying that his then pregnant Moroccan-born wife may not be able to travel from Spain to join him in Germany if he did not co-operate with them. "He says, you work with us or your wife and child go to Morocco."
The meetings continued throughout 2002 and it became apparent to Janabi that a case for war was being constructed. He said he was not asked again about the bioweapons trucks until a month before Powell's speech.
After the speech, Janabi said he called his handler at the BND and accused the secret service of breaking an agreement that they would not share anything he had told them with another country. He said he was told not to speak and placed in confinement for around 90 days.
With the US now leaving Iraq, Janabi said he was comfortable with what he did, despite the chaos of the past eight years and the civilian death toll in Iraq, which stands at more than 100,000.
"I tell you something when I hear anybody – not just in Iraq but in any war – [is] killed, I am very sad. But give me another solution. Can you give me another solution?
"Believe me, there was no other way to bring about freedom to Iraq. There were no other possibilities."
"Cheney Calls For International Ban On Torture Reports"

"The Iraqi Liar Who Started The War. Let's Torture Willing Informants To Get The Truth?
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-iraqi-liar-who-started-war-torture.html

Full Text Of John McCain's Torture Address From Senate Floor
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/full-text-of-john-mccains-anti-torture.html

"The CIA's First Detainee Spent 266 Days In A Box The Size Of A Coffin"
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-cias-first-detainee-spent-266-days.html

Water Boarding: A Clear Explanation
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/water-boarding-clear-explanation.html
"Torture Report Articles (Great Wonkblog Compendium)
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/torture-report-articles-great-wonkblog.html

CIA Torture Report: 'Torture Is A Crime And Those Responsible Must Be Tried'
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/cia-torture-report-torture-is-crime-and.html

Cheney's Lucid 1994 Rationale For NOT Invading Iraq. 
Conservatives "Must" See This
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/08/cheneys-lucid-1996-rationale-for-not.html

"Bush's Toxic Legacy In Iraq"

Torture Report Articles (Great Wonkblog Compendium)

$
0
0
1. Misrepresentations and failures

"Dysfunction, disorganization, incompetence, greed and deception... In more than 500 pages, the summary, released on Tuesday, paints a devastating picture of an agency that was ill equipped to take on the task of questioning Al Qaeda suspects, bungled the job and then misrepresented the results." Scott Shane in The New York Times.
Primary sources: The report; the CIA's response.

To design the program, the CIA relied on two contractors with no experience. The psychologists were paid $81 million, although they had no knowledge of counterterrorism, al-Qaeda or any other qualifications to speak of. Robert Windrem for NBC.

The evidence that led the CIA to Osama bin Laden did not come from torture. The agency found bin Laden's courier through a combination of digital surveillance, spycraft and information one man gave them before they began torturing him. Zack Beauchamp at Vox.

Michael Hayden gave inaccurate or misleading testimony to Congress. In classified briefings, the former director of the agency assured lawmakers that detainees would not be waterboarded more than four hours a day, that detainees would not be forced to defecate in diapers and that no detainee was seriously injured. These assurances and others were untrue. One detainee died in custody, possibly of hypothermia. Denise Lu, Swati Sharma and Christina Rivero in The Washington Post.

Some detainees were subjected to involuntary rectal feeding. The antiquated technique is typically used on patients who cannot feed themselves but urgently need to eat, such as a hiker who was rescued in the Nepalese mountains a few years ago. But agency employees used it as a form of torture. Brady Dennis inThe Washington Post.

What's not in the report are questions about whether the program was legal or ethical. "The Senate text is largely aimed at shaping how the interrogation program will be regarded by history. The inquiry was driven by Feinstein and her frequently stated determination to foreclose any prospect that the United States might contemplate such tactics again. Rather than argue their morality, Feinstein set out to prove that they did not work." Greg Miller, Adam Goldman and Julie Tate in The Washington Post.

2. Moving forward

Fifty-four countries around the world assisted in the U.S. program of torture and rendition. Here's a map. Max Fisher at Vox.

But European courts might try to prosecute Bush administration officials. The legal principle of universal jurisdiction gives courts worldwide the authority to prosecute certain violations. For example, a Spanish court indicted Chilean dictator Augosto Pinochet in 1998. Eli Lake and Josh Rogin for Bloomberg.


No one at the CIA will be prosecuted. A legal memorandum from Bush's White House advancing a radical theory of executive power under which the president could ignore Supreme Court precedent and acts of Congress will protect employees of the agency from criminal prosecution, who can claim they thought their actions were lawful. Noah Feldman for Bloomberg.

Nor is the CIA likely to lose its power or influence in U.S. government. The agency's history is riddled with scandals and failures, from the Bay of Pigs onward. "The Senate report is a substantial blow to the CIA’s reputation, one that raises fundamental questions about the extent to which the agency can be trusted. And yet, as in those previous instances of political and public outrage, the agency is expected to emerge from the investigatory rubble with its role and power in Washington largely intact." Greg Miller and Dana Priest in The Washington Post.

3. Looking back


Committee staff spent seven years working on the project. Two aides in particular sorted through reams of documents, despite the agency's opposition and the political sensitivity of their work. Adam Goldman and Ellen Nakashima in The Washington Post.

President Obama must confront an old political problem once again. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) suggested the president form a truth-and-reconciliation commission like the one South Africa established after apartheid. Others suggested the executive branch issue its own report. Obama rejected these proposals, wanting to avoid divisive hearings and to leave the past behind. Now it's returned. Steven Mufson in The Washington Post.

The program dates to Sept. 17, 2001. That's when Bush authorized the CIA to capture and interrogate suspected terrorists. Here's a timeline. Julie Tate in The Washington Post.

4. Taking stock


The CIA "stained our national honor," Sen. John McCain said. The Republican from Arizona was tortured as a prisoner of the Viet Cong in Hanoi. The Economist.

FRIEDMAN: Torture is itself a danger to American society. Part of what makes us Americans and what earns us the admiration of people around the world is our respect for civil liberties and our ability to confront our failures. The New York Times.

Former employees and some Republican lawmakers are defending the agency. They say the committee, which was able to review documents but not to interview employees, committed errors of fact and that the report emphasizes the agency's failures while ignoring its successes. Scott Shane in The New York Times.

Obama should have brought the torture "into a courtroom." Instead, he wrongly chose to not to punish those who had been involved. The New York Times.

Waterboarding. During waterboarding, water fills a subject's nose, mouth, and throat, and the subject cannot breathe. The subject does not drown, however, because his upper body is inclined toward his head and the water does not reach his lungs. The Washington Post.


"Cheney Calls For International Ban On Torture Reports"

"The Iraqi Liar Who Started The War. Let's Torture Willing Informants To Get The Truth?
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-iraqi-liar-who-started-war-torture.html

Full Text Of John McCain's Torture Address From Senate Floor
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/full-text-of-john-mccains-anti-torture.html

"The CIA's First Detainee Spent 266 Days In A Box The Size Of A Coffin"
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-cias-first-detainee-spent-266-days.html

Water Boarding: A Clear Explanation
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/water-boarding-clear-explanation.html
"Torture Report Articles (Great Wonkblog Compendium)
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/torture-report-articles-great-wonkblog.html

CIA Torture Report: 'Torture Is A Crime And Those Responsible Must Be Tried'
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/12/cia-torture-report-torture-is-crime-and.html

Cheney's Lucid 1994 Rationale For NOT Invading Iraq. 
Conservatives "Must" See This
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/08/cheneys-lucid-1996-rationale-for-not.html

"Bush's Toxic Legacy In Iraq"


Viewing all 30150 articles
Browse latest View live