Quantcast
Channel: Pax on both houses
Viewing all 30150 articles
Browse latest View live

Republicans' Growing Enthusiasm For Tearing Down Church-State Wall

$
0
0
"American Theocracy"
Kevin Phillips

***

Alan: In the absence of intellectual rigor and studious investigation of history, the "idea" of theocracy seems inimitably sublime. 

Imagine! 

Putting God Himself in charge. 

Such humility! Such devotion! Such godly submission to The King of Kings


Lamentably, theocracy provides common cover for projecting human prejudice onto God "Himself." 

Once theocracy is established, it becomes increasingly self-reinforcing, "true believers" at liberty to construe Divine Will and Divine Judgment as coincident with their own feelings and convictions. 

Theocracy's persistent contempt for "infidels" results in dispossession, injury and slaughter rained down on anyone outside the fold - anyone not "chosen" - anyone who will not submit to the imposition of (presumed) Truth.

***

"Santorum, Savonarola And The Pending Apocalypse Of The Republican Party"


***

Republicans show growing enthusiasm for tearing down the wall between church and state.

***

"The terrible thing about our time is precisely the ease with which theories can be put into practice.  The more perfect, the more idealistic the theories, the more dreadful is their realization.  We are at last beginning to rediscover what perhaps men knew better in very ancient times, in primitive times before utopias were thought of: that liberty is bound up with imperfection, and that limitations, imperfections, errors are not only unavoidable but also salutary. The best is not the ideal.  Where what is theoretically best is imposed on everyone as the norm, then there is no longer any room even to be good.  The best, imposed as a norm, becomes evil.”  
"Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander,” by Trappist monk, Father Thomas Merton

More Merton Quotes



Alan: Theocrats do not believe in Democracy - certainly not in majority rule.
Typically, theocrats are unaware of their opposition to democratic process, convinced that "God's Truth" -- under their careful guidance -- will become fully apparent to everyone, except those who deserve death, or better yet, eternal damnation. 

The SAT Gets Makeover. Designers Stick It To Test-Prep Industry

$
0
0

Teenage students taking examinations

Another major change to the prominent college entrance exam is headed students' way as The College Board, which created the test, is reverting back to its old 1,600-point based scoring system and making the essay portion optional for students beginning in 2016

The prominent SAT college entrance exam will return to its previous 1,600-point scoring system and the essay portion will be optional starting in 2016, the group that creates the test said Wednesday, the biggest makeover in almost a decade for an exam familiar to any high school student with an eye on college.
The group that makes the test, the College Board, also announced a unprecedented test-preparation partnership with the online Khan Academy that could cut deep into the lucrative business of the existing test-prep industry. Under the new test format, which last underwent an overhaul in 2005, no points will be deducted for wrong answers, encouraging students to take a chance if they’re unsure of the answer. Students will be able to choose whether or not they complete the essay portion of the test, and for those who don’t, the top score will go from 2,400 back to the older 1,600. And vocabulary words will be more practical words like “synthesis,” instead of the archaic SAT vocabulary words that have long pained cramming high school students, but rarely occur in normal conversation. Students will also be able to take the test on a computer.
And in a bid to expand access to college, qualifying low-income students who take the test will get their application fees waived in applying to four schools.
“What this country needs is not more tests, but more opportunities,” College Board president David Coleman said in a statement. “The real news today is not just the redesigned SAT, but the College Board’s renewed commitment to delivering opportunity.”
Coleman also announced a new partnership with Khan Academy to provide free, online test-prep. In a dig at the test-prep industry, Coleman said the status quo promotes inequality by charging high fees for testing secrets.
“If there are no more secrets,” he said, “it’s very hard to pay for them.”


Does Religion Make Practitioners More Moral? New Evidence Suggests "No"

$
0
0

Alan: Religion is unusually attractive to people who want pre-certified confirmation of their own personal "salvation." 

Since such self-interest is principally predicated on fear of damnation, morality tends to become a pro forma performance (disproportionately exhibited within one's own sect or cult) rather than heartfelt commitment to the wellbeing of the entire Human Family. 

Thus preoccupied with religious forms rather than the actual "work of love" (love so disinterested that it even embraces one's enemies), the everlasting Pharisaic impulse takes hold, preempting mercy, compassion and forgiveness while replacing these qualities with the showy flourish of ostentatious display. 

Televangelism characterizes the latter, while mean-spirited preachments by conservative Christian political illustrate preemption of the former. 


***

This is not to say that religion is bad. Indeed, religion is an excellent "spiritual technology" for millions of people. 

However, religion - particularly in its fearful manifestations - lends itself to confirmation of personal bias. 

As Jesuit priest Tom Weston put it: "You can safely assume you’ve created God in your own image when it turns out God hates all the same people you do."

***

"The work of heaven alone is material; the making of a material world. 
The work of hell is entirely spiritual."  
G.K. Chesterton paraphrase

***

Yeshua Excoriates Fellow Pharisees: "The Woe Passages"

***

It’s Official: Religion Doesn’t Make You More Moral

A recent study comparing views on morality of religious and non-religious people found something surprising: Religion doesn’t make our everyday lives more moral.

Suppose you actually do have an angel over your shoulder telling you the right thing to do. That angel probably wouldn’t tell you anything you didn’t already know. A recent study in Science aimed at uncovering how we experience morality in our everyday lives suggests that religious people are no more moral—or immoral—than non-religious people. Whether or not we believe that divine precepts give us guidance, our behavior is remarkably similar.
The fact that atheists are apparently as moral as believers will be counterintuitive to some. In Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov, Dmitri Karamazov famously worries, “But what will become of men then…without God and immortal life? All things are lawful then, they can do what they like?”
In late 2007, when Mitt Romney was still uncertain whether he could win the GOP presidential primary, he made a speech on religion to reassure a leery electorate. His Mormon faith was no reason to reject his candidacy, he argued. What really mattered was that he was religious, and thus had the same moral beliefs as other religious people. “Freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom,” he said, insinuating that a free but godless people might form an unruly mob. Later in the speech, he added, “Whether it was the cause of abolition, or civil rights, or the right to life itself, no movement of conscience can succeed in America that cannot speak to the convictions of religious people.”
Yet Dmitri Karamazov and Mitt Romney are likely wrong. People who don’t fear that justice will be meted out in an afterlife are apparently no more vicious, cruel, or licentious than a believer.
The current study breaks new ground in a few different ways. Perhaps most importantly, previous psychological studies of moral responses relied on observations in laboratory settings. This study, however, uses a method that allows researchers to escape the lab and catch glimpses of how participants think about morality as they go about their lives. Researchers using the method, known as “ecological momentary assessment,” periodically contact participants to report their feelings.
In this study, over 1,200 people were texted five times a day over the course of three days. The texts asked if they’d committed, experienced, or heard moral or immoral acts in the previous hour. If a participant answered yes, there were follow-up questions that prompted him or her to describe the event and some of his or her reactions to it. The researchers collected over 13,000 responses, almost 4,000 of which described a moral or immoral event. The acts ranged from the mundane to the unexpected: Assisted a tourist with directions because he looked lost. At work, someone stole my partner’s nice balsamic vinegar while he was off shift and most likely took it home with them. Hired someone to kill a muskrat that’s ultimately not causing any harm.
While both groups reported experiencing similar moral emotions, such as shame and gratitude, religious people who described their feelings were somewhat more intense.
“There have been hundreds of morality studies, and the vast majority have involved presenting people with hypothetical scenarios or dilemmas and directly asking them to make moral judgments,” wrote Jesse Graham, assistant professor of psychology at the University of Southern California, in an email to The Daily Beast. “This has told us a lot, but it hasn’t told us much about how morality plays out in daily life. This study’s use of smartphone technology allows for a more ecologically valid picture of what kinds of moral events and situations people actually encounter outside the lab.”
Daniel Wisneski, a collaborator on the study and assistant professor at St. Peter’s University, said that “heightened ecological validity was a goal of the study.” He added that “the method is not a better method, but complementary to other methods.” Eric Schwitzgebel, a professor of philosophy at University of California at Riverside who maintains a blog on the philosophy of psychology, wrote in an email, “Since the literature on moral cognition has so far been dominated by laboratory studies and online surveys, with relatively few studies of moral behavior sampled in everyday contexts, I think it’s exciting to see researchers expanding their methodology in this direction.”
The main notable difference between religious and non-religious people was that while both groups reported experiencing similar moral emotions, such as shame and gratitude, religious people who described their feelings were somewhat more intense.
But there is reason to be cautious about the results. The study relies on the participants in the study to self-report honestly and accurately, and participants might be embarrassed to reveal immoral acts. People also have a tendency to overestimate how moral they have been. Schwitzgebel believes that there are inherent problems with self-reported studies, but they can offer valuable research nonetheless. “It’s a matter of weighing concerns about the inaccuracy of self-report against concerns about how representative laboratory behavior is of behavior in non-laboratory contexts,” he said.
Wisneski agreed that the concern about self-reporting is a “valid critique” of his study. He observed, however, that many participants report committing immoral acts such as adultery, which is encouraging (at least as far as the accuracy of the study is concerned).
The study did not limit itself to comparing views of religious and non-religious people. It also compared the views of people with different political ideologies. According to one recently proposed psychological theory, the Moral Foundations Theory, there are several different grounds for finding an act moral or immoral. One act may be considered immoral because it harms someone. Another act, however, may be considered immoral not because it is harmful but because it evinces disloyalty. Previous laboratory experiments using the Moral Foundations Theory framework had shown that liberals and conservatives emphasize different moral foundations. For example, conservatives are more likely to cite acts that exhibit respect for authority as moral, while liberals are more likely to consider acts that exhibit fairness as moral. The current study confirmed these differences between liberals and conservatives outside the laboratory, but not to a striking degree. “Moral Foundations Theory found some support in theoretically predicted directions, but this was dwarfed by a huge amount of overlap between liberals and conservatives,” said Wisneski. “If we watch Fox or MSNBC, we might think that liberals are from Mars, conservatives are from Venus. But there are far more similarities.”
The researchers deliberately refrained from defining “moral” and “immoral” for study participants. Leaving the definition of “morality” open enabled the researchers to see the variety of acts that some people considered moral or immoral. “There’s always the tradeoff between the clarity of telling participants exactly what you’re looking for, and the risk of missing important aspects of their moral lives,” said Graham. “For instance, if I think morality is fundamentally about fairness and justice, and define it as such for participants, then I will get a more precise and specific set of moral events from them, but I will miss a lot of what they find morally good or bad.”
There’s some reason, though, to think most people were pretty much on the same moral page. All the moral and immoral acts that participants texted to researchers were each independently rated by several judges who did not know the purpose of the study nor anything about the participants. There was a remarkable level of agreement. The judges in aggregate differed from the participant in their opinion of the morality of an act less than 1 percent of the time.
In all, Schwitzgebel thinks that this study has been an important step forward in empirical research of morality. “In studying as complex a phenomenon as moral and immoral behavior, one wants to employ a wide variety of different methods with their various complementary advantages and disadvantages. There’s not going to be any one single perfect method,” he said. “So it’s terrific to see the literature expanding in new methodological directions like this.”

Alan: Ironically, it has been my own experience that most American Christians find it easier to feel good about the death of "enemies" than most secular humanists. 


The Pleasure And Satisfaction Of Winter Squash

$
0
0

'Tis the season for winter squash. Kathy Gunst has a number of recipes and tips and a guide for tasting and selecting squash. (Choo Yug Shing/Flickr)

‘Tis the season for winter squash. Kathy Gunst has a number of recipes and tips and a guide for tasting and selecting squash. (Choo Yug Shing/Flickr)
http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2014/09/23/winter-squash-gunst

Delicata. Golden Nugget. Orange Hubbard. Turks’ Turban. Hopi Orange. Lady Godiva. Kabocha. Poetry? Well yes, but these are also some of the names of the many varieties of winter squash.
Fall has begun and that has Here & Nowresident chef Kathy Gunst thinking about winter squash.  As Gunst tells Jeremy Hobson, though many winter squashes are harvested in the late summer, their very hard rinds keep them fresh and available for cooking through winter.
Winter squash needs to be stored in a dry, cool, dark spot where they can last for up to 3 to 6 months, depending on the conditions. Store winter squash at around 50 degrees—when it’s warmer the squash tends to deteriorate and freezing temperatures can ruin its firm texture.
Choose hard-shelled squash without any soft spots. The colors should be bright, vibrant and fresh looking. And when you look for squash – from a farmers market or the supermarket—pick ones that feel heavy in your hand. This is a sign that there is a good deal of edible flesh. The yellow-orange flesh inside winter squash contains plenty of vitamin A, vitamin C, niacin, phosphorous, and potassium.

Winter Squash and Sage Risotto

0923_gunst-squash1Comfort food at its best: a creamy rice dish with beautiful chunks of winter squash accented with fried sage leaves.
Serves 4.
Ingredients1 1/2 tablespoons olive oil
1/2 cup chopped yellow or red onion3 tablespoons thinly sliced fresh sage2 cups peeled, and chopped winter squash (about 1/2-inch cubes)Salt and freshly ground black pepper1 cup Arborio or risotto rice2 1/2 cups chicken or vegetable stockAbout 1 cup grated Parmesan cheeseSage leaves for garnish or fried sage leaves for garnish
Instructions
In a medium pot heat the oil over low heat. Add onion and sauté 5 minutes. Add half the sage and the squash and cook, stirring occasionally, for 10 minutes, the squash should be almost tender. Season with salt and pepper.
Add the rice and stir to coat all the rice grains with the vegetables. Add the remaining sage. Slowly add about 1/2 cup stock at a time, stirring well until the stock is incorporated. The risotto should still have a “bite,” and not be soft and mushy. Be sure not to overcook it as it will continue to cook when you remove it from the heat.
Remove from the heat and stir in the cheese. Taste for seasoning and serve hot topped with sage leaves or the fried sage leaves (see below).

Roasted Butternut Squash Salad with Arugula and Yogurt-Tahini Dressing

0923_gunst-squash2A delicious autumn salad filled with Middle Eastern flavors. The dressing can be made ahead of time and is delicious on all kinds of salads.
Serves 4.
InstructionsFor the SquashOne 2-pound butternut or winter squash, peeled, deseeded, and cut into 1/2 inch slices or wedges
Salt and freshly ground black pepper2 tablespoons olive oil
1/4 cup maple syrup
1 teaspoon Za’tar* or ground cumin
2 cup arugula or fall greens
1/3 cup chopped scallions for garnish
For the Yogurt-Tahini Dressing
1/4 cup chopped scallions
1/4 cup yogurt
2 tablespoons tahini
Salt and pepper
1 1/2 tablespoons lemon juice or white wine vinegar
3 tablespoon olive oil
1/4 cup cold water
InstructionsFor the SquashPreheat the oven to 400 degrees. Toss the squash slices with salt and pepper and oil over and spread on a cookie sheet, baking tray or shallow oven pan. Roast on the middle shelf for 12 minute.
Raise heat to 450 degrees and drizzle on maple syrup and sprinkle on the za’tar and bake another 10 minutes, or until tender when tested with small sharp knife. It shouldn’t be falling apart tender but should still hold its shape. Remove and let cool to room temperature.
For the Dressing
In a bowl mix the scallions and yogurt. Stir in the tahini until smooth. Add salt, pepper, lemon juice, olive oil and water and stir to mix into a smooth sauce. Place in a covered jar and refrigerate for up to 3 days. Makes about 3/4 of a cup.
To serve: arrange arugula or spicy fall greens on a plate. Arrange squash slices on top. Sprinkle with scallions and juices from the bottom of the baking sheet. Lightly dress the green and serve dressing on the side. Serve at room temperature.
*Za’tar is a spice blend found in many Middle Eastern and specialty food shops. It can also be ordered online.

Winter Squash Soup with Fried Sage Leaves

The pale orange color of this creamy, soothing soup is spectacular, particularly when topped with fried green sage leaves. The soup can be made using virtually any type of winter squash and can be prepared 24 hours ahead of time. It can also be frozen for several months.
Look for a small sugar pumpkin or firm butternut or winter squash to make the soup. Many sugar pumpkins and smaller pumpkin varieties (names such as Baby Bear, Jack Be Little, and Wee-B-Little) are marketed as “cooking pumpkins” versus carving or ornamental pumpkins. Sugar pumpkins are sweeter (some are stringless) and a lot easier to cook with, but you can use any type of fresh pumpkin. The smaller the pumpkin, the easier it will be to chop into small pieces.
Makes about 12 cups; serves 10 to 12.
IngredientsFor the soupA 2-pound sugar pumpkin, or acorn, butternut, or any winter squash1 tablespoon olive oil1 teaspoon butter3 leeks, dark green part discarded, white part cut in half lengthwise, rinsed, and cut into 1-inch pieces (about 2 cups)1 tablespoon chopped fresh thyme, or 1 teaspoon dried1 tablespoon chopped fresh sage, or 1 teaspoon dried1/8 teaspoon salt, or to tasteGenerous grinding black pepper7 cups chicken broth, or vegetable broth
For the garnish
About 1 cup heavy cream or crème fraiche, optional
2 cups croutons, optional
Fried sage leaves
InstructionsFor the SoupUsing a large, sharp knife, cut the pumpkin or squash into 2 to 3-inch chunks. Remove the seeds and stringy sections of the pumpkin and discard; or you can save the seeds to roast. Carefully cut the rind off the pumpkin chunks and cut the flesh into 1- to 2-inch pieces. You should have about 8 cups.
In a large soup pot, heat the oil and butter over medium-low heat. Add the leeks and sauté, stirring frequently, for 4 minutes. Add pumpkin chunks, thyme, sage, salt, and pepper. Cover and cook for 5 minutes. Remove the cover, add the chicken broth, and bring to a boil over high heat. Reduce the heat to low, cover, and simmer for about 25 minutes, or until the pumpkin is tender. Remove and let cool slightly.
Working with a blender or food processor, puree the soup in batches. Taste for seasoning, place the pureed soup back into the pot and warm over low heat. Drizzle the cream or crème fraiche into the soup, or swirl into each bowl, and top with a few croutons and the sage leaves, if desired.
For the Fried Sage Leaves
You can use this technique – frying whole herbs in hot oil—with any type of fresh herb, but sage works particularly well. The herbs must be cleaned of any dirt and thoroughly patted dry before frying.
To make the fried sage leaves you’ll need 2 to 3 cups of olive or safflower oil, a bunch of very fresh herbs, and some good sea salt. Carefully snip off and separate small bundles of the sage (about 3 to 4 leaves attached to a small piece of the stem) and set aside.
Heat the oil in a medium-sized heavy skillet over high heat until the oil just begins to smoke and very carefully lower the sage into the hot oil. (The oil is hot enough when the sage leaves immediately being to sizzle.) Fry for about 30 seconds.
Remove the sage with a slotted spoon and drain on paper towels or a clean, brown grocery bag. Don’t make the sage more than 15 minutes ahead of time or it will wilt. Sprinkle the fried leaves with salt (sea salt is particularly good) and use as a garnish for soups, stews, pasta dishes, and salads. Fried sage leaves are also a delicious treat served alongside a martini.

Guest



Educated People Are 3 Times Healthier Than Uneducated People

$
0
0

Alan: If educational attainment translates into a healthy body, one can reasonably conjecture that educational level also results in healthier Body Politic. Needless to say, those citizens who choose to keep themselves stupid through Fox News will resist this hypothesis tooth and nail.
"People Who Watch Only Fox News Know Less Than Those Who Watch No News"
***
Access to health care alone isn't the great equalizer you might think it is.
Analyzing 2011 data among Kaiser Permanente of North California patients, researchers at the Virginia Commonwealth University Center on Society and Health found that even when people have access to the same kind of care, educational achievement still played a huge role in whether people are in good health.
Self-reported health data aren't always the most reliable, but you can see a clear difference in reported health status in the following chart. Adults ages 25-64 who graduated college are more than twice as likely to say they're in very good health when compared to those who didn't complete high school. Even the difference between graduating college and attending some college amounted to 16 percentage points in that age group.
Similarly, the VCU research, supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, found adults in the same age group who didn't graduate high school were almost three times as likely to report having physical health problems interfering with daily activities when compared to college graduates.
There's a number of factors at play here. People with more education have lower disease risk factors, such as smoking and obesity; better education means better jobs with higher earnings and health insurance; and it means better access to healthy food and other services enabling healthier lifestyles. Past research shows that white men and women with 16 or more years of education have a life expectancy about at least 10 years longer than those who didn't graduate high school.
The lesson here, VCU researchers say, is that equal access to care isn't enough to eliminate the disparities in our health-care system.
"Health care reform must be accompanied by changes in social and economic policies that are a 'win-win': creating economic opportunity for families while also saving lives (and costs) from medical illnesses," they write.


Jason Millman covers all things health policy, with a focus on Obamacare implementation. He previously covered health policy for Politico.

After Ferguson, Only 38% Of Americans Believe Justice Is Color-Blind

$
0
0
Alan: Since 2013, the percentage of young adults who believe the American justice system is biased against people of color has risen 58%.

In a post-Ferguson world, Americans increasingly doubt the notion of colorblind justice

Today fewer than 4-in-10 (38 percent) of Americans say that blacks receive equal treatment under the criminal justice system. That's a ten percentage point drop from one year ago, when the public was evenly divided on the question.
This finding comes from the Public Religion Research Institute's latestAmerican Values Survey. It finds growing skepticism among every demographic group over the way the criminal justice system treats minorities. More than 6-in-10 young adults now say that blacks don't receive equal treatment over the law, a number that has skyrocketed nearly 50 percent in the past year. Whites, Republicans and older Americans are less likely to see racial disparities in the justice system, but they are still significantly more likely to say the system treats minorities unequally than they were a year ago.
“Americans are increasingly doubtful that the criminal justice system is colorblind,” said Daniel Cox, PRRI's Research Director. Significantly, most of the responses on this question were collected before the shooting of Michael Brown and subsequent protests in Ferguson, Missouri, which drew national attention to the treatment of blacks by the police and courts. Had the survey been fully conducted after Ferguson, it stands to reason that the drop in confidence in the justice system may have been even steeper.
However, the numbers do allow for some comparison between people who were interviewed before Ferguson, and those who were interviewed after. The events didn't have a large impact on Americans' opinions of racial justice overall - 38 percent said blacks receive racial justice before the shooting, while 36 percent said the same after.
But there were some racial differences. Whites were slightly more likely to believe in equal racial treatment after the Ferguson shooting. The 4 percentage point jump isn't huge and I'd caution against making too much of it. But in the event that it's not just a statistical blip, it would comport with other recent research showing that whites view the criminal justice system more favorably when they learn it perpetuates racial disparities.
More significantly, non-white respondents were about half as likely to believe in equal treatment under the law after Ferguson. Belief in racial equality among this group plummeted from 29 percent before Ferguson to 16 percent after.
As I've noted in the past, black and white Americans tend to have highly divergent experiences with the criminal justice system. So the racial differences on the PRRI survey question are not necessarily surprising, even if they are quite troubling.
But the loss of faith among Americans in the colorblindness of our police and judiciary is new. A slim majority of whites now disagree with the idea that the law treats blacks and other minorities equally. Combined with the growing attention on racial disparity in the post-Ferguson world, these numbers may portend a serious desire for meaningful reform going forward.
Christopher Ingraham is a data journalist focusing primarily on issues of politics, policy and economics. He previously worked at the Brookings Institution and the Pew Research Center.

India's Successful Mission To Mars Cost 30% Less Than Making The Movie, "Gravity"

$
0
0
BANGALORE As India closes in on its destination Mars with the Mangalyaan satellite, many across the world have been dumbstruck at the low cost of India's Mars Orbiter mission. Here are the details on how India achieved this seemingly impossible task, becoming the envy of the world.(India's Mars Orbiter, Mangalyaan Clears Crucial Test)

This golden satellite, approximately the size of a Nano car, and the entire Mars Orbiter mission have been made ready at a record cost ofRs. 450 crore or nearly $67 million dollars. (Watch the Video)

Put together by the Indian Space Research Organisation or ISRO in a record time of 15 months, it has been on a 300-day marathon, covering some 670 million kilometres to reach its destination Mars. This is undoubtedly the lowest-cost inter-planetary mission ever to be undertaken in the world. (In Asian Space Race, India Inches Closer to Beating China to Mars

On his recent visit to India's rocket port in June, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had remarked, "The Hollywood movie Gravity cost more than our Mars mission - this is a great achievement." (Watch: Mission Mars: Countdown Continues, Will India Make History?)

NASA's latest mission to Mars called MAVEN, which incidentally reached the Red Planet on Monday ahead of the Indian satellite, costs ten times more. (NASA's MAVEN Enters Mars Orbit)

"This has been a cheap mission. But we have not compromised; we have done it in two years and ground testing has helped," said K Radhakrishnan, Chairman of ISRO.

The darling of Martian dreamers -- American rover Curiosity which has been sitting on the surface of the Red Planet -- cost over a whopping 2 billion dollars. India's technological capabilities and frugal bills have help cut costs. (PM Modi to Witness Mars Orbiter Insertion at ISRO Facility)  

Mangalyaan is the cheapest inter-planetary mission ever to be undertaken anywhere in the world. It has cost Rs. 450 crores or just about Rs. 4 per person in India. India is paving the way for faster, cheaper and possibly durable inter-planetary missions.

Healthy Lifestyle May Prevent 80% Of All Heart Attacks

$
0
0
By Randy Dotinga
HealthDay Reporter
beating_heart_for_card.jpg
MONDAY, Sept. 22, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Five recommended health behaviors may prevent four out of five heart attacks in men, a new study suggests.
Middle-aged and older men were much less likely to have heart attacks over an average of 11 years if they drank moderately, didn't smoke and did everything right on the diet, exercise and weight fronts, the study found.
Only about 1 percent of men involved in the study fit into this ultra-healthy-living category. But they were 86 percent less likely to have heart attacks than those who ate poorly, were overweight, exercised too little, smoked and drank too much alcohol, the researchers said.
The healthiest men could still eventually die of a heart attack, of course, and the study didn't say if they live longer than others.
Still, "there is a lot to gain and money to be saved if people had a healthier lifestyle," said study lead author Agneta Akesson, an associate professor with the Institute of Environmental Medicine at Karolinska Institute in Solna, Sweden.
Akesson's team wanted to gain insight into the combined effect of different aspects of healthy living. Few studies have examined the overall impact in this manner, Akesson said.
For the study, published Sept. 22 in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, the researchers examined medical records and surveys of more than 20,700 Swedish men who were 45 to 79 years old in 1997. At the time, they had no history of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure or high cholesterol. The researchers tracked them until 2009 to see how they fared.
Eight percent of the men -- 1,724 -- did not practice any of the five healthy behaviors, and 166 of that group wound up suffering heart attacks.
Of the 1 percent of men -- 212 -- who practiced all five healthy behaviors, only three had heart attacks.
Based on their findings, the researchers concluded that all five healthy behaviors together could prevent 79 percent of first heart attacks in men.
Also, each behavior by itself reduced the risk for heart attack. For example, eating a diet rich in beneficial foods such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, reduced-fat dairy and whole grains was associated with a nearly 20 percent lower risk compared to those who practiced none of the healthy behaviors, the study found.
The study has limitations. It doesn't look at how long the men lived. Nor does it offer insight into ethnic minorities, since most of the men in the study were white.
As for women, Akesson is the co-author of a previous study suggesting healthy living has a similar effect on females.
Akesson said the study suggests that men should aim to change their behavior in all five areas analyzed in the study. They can eat better, lose weight, exercise (the healthiest men cycled or walked at least 40 minutes a day), stop smoking and drink only moderately, which was defined as about one drink a day.
One expert said the findings are a good reminder that the benefits of healthy behaviors add up.
"People looking for a magic pill or a modern new technology to prevent heart disease need to be reminded how important lifestyle factors are," said Dr. R. Curtis Ellison, professor of medicine and public health at Boston University School of Medicine.
Ellison praised the study and added that men shouldn't be cavalier about the risk of a heart attack in an era of great medical advances. "It is uncommon for people to die from a first heart attack these days. However, these people are more likely to have future heart trouble," he said.
"Preventing the first heart attack leads to a longer number of healthy years and lower risk of disability as someone ages," Ellison said.
More information
For more about healthy behavior for your heart, visit the American Heart Association.

Fox News Shuts Down Comment Section On Article About Gay Repubican

$
0
0

Fox News Shuts Down Comments On Article About Gay Republican

As the PR division of the Republican Party, Fox News has the massive burden of improving the public impression of a party that is widely viewed as being intolerant of minorities, dismissive of women, advocates for the rich, and proselytizers for a distinctly right-wing flavor of Christianity. While the GOP claims to want to broaden the appeal of the party, their policies work to do just the opposite. This makes the job much more difficult for Fox News who are trying to solicit favor from Latinos while opposing immigration; from women while opposing equal pay; from African-Americans while opposing affirmative action; and from workers while opposing unions, unemployment benefits, and raising the minimum wage.
Add to these groups the LGBT community. This is a particularly tough needle to thread for Fox and the GOP. They want to appear to be open-minded, but their positions are fervently anti-gay. They oppose marriage equality, non-discrimination in the workplace, hospital and survivor benefits, etc. And they are not particularly welcoming to gay Republican groups like GOProud and the Log Cabin Republicans.
Fox News
This isn’t the only thing Fox is afraid of.
Get Fox Nation vs. Reality. Available now at Amazon.
Somehow, Fox News needs to advance its mission of electing more Republicans without alienating their conservative, Tea Party base. In pursuit of that end, Fox ran a story by Dana Perino, former press Secretary for George W. Bush and a Fox News contributor, that sought to expose what she regards as hypocrisy on the part of Democrats. The article was titled “Straight Talk About Gay Republican Congressional Candidate Carl DeMaio,” and questioned why Democrats were withholding their support from a gay San Diego congressional candidate that she thought Democrats should back automatically.
The notion that Democrats have some inherent responsibility to back any candidate on the basis of their sexual orientation is absurd. Democrats will not support gays (or women or African-Americans or Latinos, etc.) who work against the interests of their constituents. To suggest that they should is a remarkably ignorant and narrow-minded view of civic duty. It is also not the course that ethical gays would take. For example, Stampp Corbin, publisher of the San Diego LGBT Weekly, addressed DeMaio’s candidacy saying that
“The Republican Party platform says Republicans ‘reaffirm our support for a constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman.’ The Democratic platform says ‘Gay rights are human rights.’ Could there be more of a contrast? [...] Why would LGBT people elect someone who is part of a party that wants to deny LGBT people basic rights?”
Exactly. DeMaio is running against Democratic incumbant Scott Peters, who has been an outspoken advocate of LGBT rights, despite being straight. This is a concept that Perino and Fox News obviously don’t grasp.
However, they do know their audience. Which is why Fox News is not permitting any of them to comment on this story. Even though Fox News allows comments on all of their other news articles, they have closed off comments for this one. Why would they treat this article differently than all of the others? Perhaps because they are aware that the Fox News audience is likely to post derogatory and obscene insults directed at the candidate they are trying to promote. Fox doesn’t want to see the torrent of anti-gay sentiment that they know would occur if they allowed people to post comments.
The same censorship has been enacted at the lie-riddled Fox Nation website. They posted the same story and also prohibited those readers from commenting. Which is even more egregious since Fox Nation is supposed to be the community site where discussion is encouraged. Their mission statement says that…
“The Fox Nation is committed to the core principles of tolerance, open debate, civil discourse, and fair and balanced coverage of the news.”
We already knew that, contrary to their claim, Fox has no commitment to tolerance, civil discourse, or fair and balanced coverage of the news. And now we know that they also do not tolerate open debate. Have you ever heard of a community forum website that prohibited the community from engaging in a forum discussion? That’s “straight talk”Fox News style.

Congressional Republicans Couple Unabashed Prostitution With Flabbergasting Stupidity

Middle Class Hasn't Gotten A Raise In 15 Years

Islamist Jihad, Absolutism And The Justification Of Slaughter As God's Will

$
0
0
Alan: Among the pathologically oppositional, revenge is the fundamental reaction to perceived insult... or just garden-variety cultural differences.

Everyone must be identical to The True Believer.

The universal imposition of one unvarying identity is the only ground on which "true believers" can be confident that their own brittle identity has worth.

To insure that true believers' fragile sense-of-self is reflected in -- and confirmed by -- the identical belief system of everyone else, ethnic cleansing and genocide are justified as God's Will.

The rationale for monstrosity is no longer "the devil made me do it" but "God made me do it."

Since God is planning infidels' damnation this very moment, why not get an early start?

***

"You can safely assume you’ve created God in your own image 
when it turns out God hates all the same people you do."
Tom Weston S. J.

***

"The terrible thing about our time is precisely the ease with which theories can be put into practice.  The more perfect, the more idealistic the theories, the more dreadful is their realization.  We are at last beginning to rediscover what perhaps men knew better in very ancient times, in primitive times before utopias were thought of: that liberty is bound up with imperfection, and that limitations, imperfections, errors are not only unavoidable but also salutary. The best is not the ideal.  Where what is theoretically best is imposed on everyone as the norm, then there is no longer any room even to be good.  The best, imposed as a norm, becomes evil.”  
"Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander,” by Trappist monk, Father Thomas Merton

More Merton Quotes



Another War In A Region We Don't Understand And Where We Have No Reliable Allies

Withhold NPR Donation Until Management Corrects Egregious Falsification

$
0
0
Alan: It took 24 hours to decide that the Daily Kos news item (below) deserved posting. At first it seemed an overblown grievance. Then, at 4:00 p.m. the day after the massive Manhattan protest -- I heard NPR report that the People's Climate March had been attended by "tens of thousands" of people. This manhandling of truth recalls Pravda during The Gulag's heyday. Keeping in mind that NPR missed the mark by a factor or ten, I encourage NPR sustainers to inform National Public Radio that they will withhold future donation until management retracts its falsehood. 
***

Fox News: "400,000 Protesters Participated in People's Climate March"

Dear Ombudsman,
Today over 300,000 people marched in New York for climate action. Hundreds of thousands around the world joined in solidarity rallies, including myself. The pictures from New York were amazing.
At 5 PM (Pacific) I turned on NPR news to see what they say about the rally.
The lead item was about some US general who said the Ukraine cease-fire is not really there, quoting his analysis of the situation at length. To my knowledge nothing dramatic has happened over there in recent days. The second item was about 1500 firefighters fighting the huge California fires - a worthy item, no question. A slew of items followed, including a re-broadcast of what Rep. King (R-Iowa) had to say on Fox News about the guy who breached security at the White House (but caused no damage).
After 5 minutes, a dozen or so items and still no mention of the climate march, I gave up in disgust and switched to a music station. I find it beyond ridiculous, that the event considered top news by leading media around the world and happening on the very same coast of the US where NPR HQ is located, was nowhere to be found, rather than being the lead item.
I now visited your website, where coverage of the march is currently posted with this lovely title:
"Large Protests In Hundreds Of Cities Vent Ire Over Climate Change"
Ire? Vent?  Do you run a special class to reporters, in how to create dismissive headlines for news items? By the way, the story body was somewhat better, but still taking a "lighter" view of the issue.
I have long suspected - with good evidence - that NPR news does little more than shill for the same interest that dominate our politics and mainstream media, albeit with a high-brow veneer. I think the final proof has arrived today.
Sincerely,
Assaf
Monday AM Update:
Ok... so I literally copy-pasted my letter to the NPR Ombudsman, for a short diary sharing my frustration with NPR. Sunday night... I was thinking 10 recs and 5 comments, max.
As the very first line in the diary says, I was seeking to see whether other people experienced the same with NPR coverage (or lack thereof) yesterday. I only listened to one hourly newscast, which made me very mad.
But the rec list with hundreds of readers? Guess I hit a nerve... so first, thanks for the attention.
Second, without going into specifics, I think some of the comments go overboard to each direction. I can only be responsible for what I wrote.
But it would be nice to know from future commenters, what they heard (or not) on NPR about the march during the day yesterday, as well as tomorrow morning. It will give me and readers a sense of whether that non-mention in the evening hourly news, and the online headline which I still find untrue and insulting, were a fluke - or a pattern that includes NPR and other news outlets. I already saw in one comment that CNN only reported the march online but not on TV (CNN TV is pretty much the default channel in, e.g., airport terminals). Did they really not cover it?
Thanks and happy Monday,
Assaf

Tom Toles: A World In Which "Designated Enemies" Won't Stay Put

$
0
0
Alan: Most often, humans wage war because they like to fight, not because a "designated enemy" deserves designation.

"Why We Fight"
Freely streamable, prizewinning documentary
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/08/dwight-eisenhower-war-is-brutal-futile.html



"Why of course the people don't want war... Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought along to do the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." Hermann Goering, Adolf Hitler's Deputy Chief and Luftwaffe Commander, at the Nuremberg trials, 1946

***

"War, Peace and Political Manipulation"
Quotations




The Fraction Of Americans Who Never Married - 20% - Is At All-Time High

Climate Summit: China Describes A Plan. Richard Nixon Leads The Way

$
0
0
Nixon's Historic "Clean Air Act"

***

"Six Good Things Nixon Did For The Environment"

***
The strongest signal yet China will act... "President Obama spoke bluntly of American responsibility for global warming and pledged that ambitious steps would be unveiled over the next year to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Obama was followed by Chinese Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli, who said that China would put forth a plan in early 2015 to reach a peak in its greenhouse gases 'as soon as possible' and scale back emissions thereafter. The announcements by leaders of the two top emitters of greenhouse gases fed a cautious optimism among many observers that after decades of limited action, the international community is moving to take meaningful steps to address climate change." Neela Banerjee and Kathleen Hennessey in the Los Angeles Times.
...but can the world count on China? "While it’s far from clear...there are at least two good reasons to hope it will. The first is that, to be frank, oppressive, centrally managed states in which leaders have little concern for public perception and where the public has little recourse to challenge policy can change the way they do business much more quickly than a liberal democracy can. The second is that China has a compelling reason to take decisive action: Its current policies are killing its citizens and making its cities unlivable, even if the government won’t publicly acknowledge it. The decision China makes, however, will have effects far beyond its own cities and its own people." Rob Garver in The Fiscal Times.
One thing missing from this whole discussion: Nixon's "Clean Air Act." "There was little discussion of one increasingly obvious observation: The planet might be in better shape today if more countries had followed the lead of the Richard Nixon administration when it and Congress enacted the pioneering Clean Air Act in 1970. World experts credit the act, which was revised in 1977 and 1990, with giving the United States an early lead in fighting air pollution. That’s reflected in health and air pollution measurements in the second decade of the 21st century." John Zarocostas in McClatchy Newspapers.
Bottom line, though: Countries everywhere are missing their emissions targets. "Worldwide greenhouse gas emissions are still rising, driven by a hunger for energy as economies grow. Even many industrialized countries are going to blow through the 2020 emissions targets they agreed to meet at earlier climate summits. The United States can claim some success....Even so, these measures are still not adequate in the view of most climate scientists and energy experts. And U.S. emissions actually rose a bit in 2013." Steven Mufson in The Washington Post.
ICYMI: China, U.S. and India are pushing up global carbon-dioxide emissions. Seth Borenstein in theAssociated Press.
Interactive: How various countries contribute to climate change. The Guardian.
One thing missing from this whole discussion: The Clean Air Act. "There was little discussion of one increasingly obvious observation: The planet might be in better shape today if more countries had followed the lead of the Richard Nixon administration when it and Congress enacted the pioneering Clean Air Act in 1970. World experts credit the act, which was revised in 1977 and 1990, with giving the United States an early lead in fighting air pollution. That’s reflected in health and air pollution measurements in the second decade of the 21st century." John Zarocostas in McClatchy Newspapers.
World leaders may get inspiration from looking at their cities. "Cities could reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that most climate scientists say drive global warming 24 percent by 2030 and 47 percent by 2050, according to a report from U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's Special Envoy for Cities and Climate Change....Cities could reduce global emissions 3.7 gigatons of carbon dioxide equivalent by 2030 and up to 8 gigatons by 2050. For contrast, the International Energy Agency predicts emissions would hit 55 gigatons in 2050, up from 31 gigatons in 2010, if nothing is done to address them." Zack Colman in the Washington Examiner.
Obama's biggest climate victory may have nothing to do with CO2. "Back in June, Obama and Xi agreed to press the case for adding another class of chemicals to the treaty. They're coolants called hydrofluorocarbons, and you might find them in your car's air conditioner. Since there are perfectly good alternatives in many applications, getting rid of hydrofluorocarbons is diplomatically feasible. If the treaty is revised to include them, the earth in 2100 could be cooler by 1 degree Fahrenheit than it would be otherwise....The hope is that by focusing on these other gases, humans can at least put a check on rising temperatures in the near term. One degree Fahrenheit is not nearly enough to make the world safe from climate change, but at least it is something." Max Ehrenfreund in The Washington Post.
And, as we noted yesterday, from businesses. "Forty companies, among them Kellogg, L’Oréal and Nestlé, signed a declaration on Tuesday pledging to help cut tropical deforestation in half by 2020 and stop it entirely by 2030. They included several of the largest companies handling palm oil, the production of which has resulted in rampant destruction of old-growth forests....Companies are playing a larger role than at any such gathering in the past — and issuing a blizzard of promises. Several environmental groups said they were optimistic that at least some of these would be kept, but they warned that corporate action was not enough, and that climate change could not be solved without stronger steps by governments." Justin Gillis in The New York Times.
Oil companies quietly prepare for a future of carbon pricing. "for the first time, the oil majors appeared to be lifting the lid on the accounting sleights of hand that have kept the full costs of oil hidden from public view....None of this suggests that the world's petroleum giants are contemplating a move away from oil. It does, however, signal the emergence of a new era in which oil companies' financial liability for climate change is coming to be more clearly understood." Mark Schapiro and Jason Scorse in Yale Environment 360.
Explainer: Many businesses are making carbon-neutral promises. What does that actually mean? Chris Clarke in KCET.
U.S. joins other nations, groups and firms in deforestation accord. "The 'New York Declaration on Forests'...would reduce between 4.5 billion and 8.8 billion tons of greenhouse gases annually, according to the United Nations Development Program. The effort would be equal to 'removing from the road every car in the world, or not burning a trillion pounds of coal, or turning off every smokestack and tailpipe' in the U.S., the UNDP said. Crafted as a marquee initiative...the new deforestation initiative goes further than previous efforts, in the scope of participation and targets....Yet from the outset, problems in the initiative have emerged. China and India, two of the three largest carbon polluters in the world, have not signed on" Neela Banerjee in the Los Angeles Times.
Climate Change Flooding To Affect One Person In Forty By End Of Century: Another example of how climate change's impact will be unequal. "Across the globe, about one person in 40 lives in a place likely to be exposed to such flooding by the end of the century, absent significant changes. These figures are the result of a new analysis of sea levels and flood risk around the world, conducted by Climate Central....The analysis offers more evidence that the countries emitting the most carbon aren’t necessarily the ones that will bear the brunt of climate change. The United States — one of the world’s largest carbon emitters per capita and historically the overall largest emitter — ranks 34th on the list of risk of flood exposure, between India and Madagascar." Gregor Aisch, David Leonhardt and Kevin Quealy in The New York Times.
PORTER: Hidden benefits of mitigating climate change. "This time, though, advocates come armed with a trump card: All things considered, the cost of curbing carbon emissions may be considerably cheaper than earlier estimates had suggested. For all the fears that climate change mitigation would put the brakes on growth, it might actually enhance it. Whether this can tip the balance toward the global grand bargain that has eluded world leaders so many times depends on a couple of things. The first is to what extent it is true. The second is whether this is, in fact, the issue that matters most to the people making the decisions." Eduardo Porter in The New York Times.
WILLIAMS AND MARTINS: What Rousseau can tell us about challenges facing the marchers. "Recent evidence suggests consequential change in public opinion is possible, for example, in the rapid evolution of views on same-sex marriage. Challenges to established economic interests meet greater resistance, however, and action on climate change threatens disruption to those with the most power to bend public opinion toward their own wills. For Rousseau, it is the sad fate of failing republics that justice is commonly 'bent to the interest of the most powerful.' As such, any democratic solution to the problems introduced by climate change requires a reinvigorated commitment to the egalitarian foundations of democracy itself." David Lay Williams and Brad Mapes-Martins in The Washington Post.
FLAVELLE: Your island sinking? Go to Canada. "There's no obligation under international law to provide asylum to those whose homes are rendered unlivable by rising sea levels, crop failure, severe storms or other consequences of climate change. The 1951 Geneva Convention recognizes as refugees only those who leave their home country out of fear of persecution; anyone who leaves for another reason is a migrant. Refugees are entitled to settlement in other countries; migrants aren’t. Climate change challenges the logic of that distinction, spurring calls to update the 1951 convention or create new agreements. Those efforts may eventually lead somewhere, but there's nothing stopping wealthy countries from acting on their own."Christopher Flavelle in Bloomberg View.


Boring But Important: National Debt Will Swell When Interest Rates Rise

$
0
0
Fed rate hikes could swell the debt. "In the latest economic projections by individual Fed policymakers, the median expectation for short-term interest rates at the end of 2017 is 3.75 percent. Compare that to the CBO's estimate from August of 2.5 percent. For 2016, the Fed is at nearly 3 percent while the CBO is at 1.5 percent. For 2015, the Fed is just under 1.5 percent while the CBO is at 0.6 percent. If CBO based its estimates on interest rate projections that prove to be too low, the effect on the budget outlook could be severe. More interest means more debt, which means more interest." Anthony Mirhaydari in The Fiscal Times



Another Healthcare Success Story - And A Big One!

$
0
0
"Obamacare: Where's The Train Wreck?"

***

A health-care success story. "Today, more than 5.3 million Medicare beneficiaries nationwide are served by more than 360 A.C.O.s, which have helped hold spending hundreds of millions of dollars below Medicare targets for this period. Many primary care physicians — who are responsible for directing the vast majority of health care costs — are forming A.C.O.s, and more private health plans are setting up these reimbursement structures as well. A continued slowing of health care cost growth will owe a good deal to this revolution in how we pay for medical care." Bob Kocher and Farzad Mostashari in The New York Times



Rural Guineans Kill 8 Ebola Aid Workers, Stuff Bodies In Village Latrine

$
0
0

To the uneducated, science looks scary.


At least 8 Ebola aid workers reportedly killed 'in cold blood' by villagers in Guinea

At least eight Ebola aid workers and journalists were reportedly murdered and dumped in a latrine in a remote village in Guinea in a frightening example of the growing distrust locals have of foreigners coming to help stem the mushrooming health crisis.
These deaths are believed to be the first resulting from resistance to international efforts to curb the Ebola outbreak in the region, Reuters reported. Other aid teams have been forced to turn back by crowds in several locations, and a treatment center in Monrovia, Liberia was attacked and looted.
Villagers in an area near the city of Nzerekore used machetes and clubs to attack eight members of a team trying to raise awareness about the disease, officials told the BBC.
"The eight bodies were found in the village latrine," Albert Damantang Camara, a spokesman for Guinea's government, told Reuters on Thursday, adding that they had been "killed in cold blood by the villagers."
Prime Minister Fofana reported that the aid mission included "local administrators, two medical officers, a preacher and three accompanying journalists." They were reportedly attacked by a large crowd, throwing stones, from the village of Wome.
The delegation had arrived on Tuesday to do disinfection work and educate people about preventing Ebola, but residents pelted them with rocks and beat them, according to the Los Angeles Times, citing Guinean radio reports.  The group fled into the bush. One journalist who escaped said she heard people looking for her while she hid, according to the BBC.
On Thursday, the bodies were found in the septic tank of a village school in the village, according to Camara. Six people have been arrested and the village is now reportedly deserted. Although a motive for the murders has not been confirmed, a BBC report says many villagers have accused the health workers of spreading the disease. Others do not believe that the disease exists.
Ebola first surfaced in March in southeastern Guinea, where the attacks took place. Since then, it has spread through the lower continent despite international efforts to combat it.
More than 2,600 people in West Africa have died from the disease.
Complicating efforts is the lack of education in remote areas, where some residents don't believe the virus exists. Last month, in the same area where the aid workers were killed, people rioted out of fear that workers disinfecting a market were contaminating people, according to the BBC.
Security for aid workers, for clinics and hospitals, remains a concern in the region. All of the governments affected and the international agencies fighting the epidemic are trying to reach out to the rural communities where misinformation and fear have prevented effective measures to control the spread of Ebola. Until all of the areas with infections have been reached and controls implemented, a reservoir of Ebola will remain and continue to spread, say experts.
The United Nations Security Council declared the Ebola outbreak in West Africa a "threat to international peace and security" Thursday.  
Since March, the virus has infected at least 5,357 people, according to World Health Organization (WHO), mostly in Guinea, neighboring Sierra Leone and Liberia. It has also spread to Senegal and Nigeria.
It is the world's worst outbreak of Ebola, with officials warning that more than 20,000 people could ultimately be infected.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said on Thursday he will create a special mission to combat the disease and deployed staff in the worst-affected states.
Neighboring Sierra Leone has begun a controversial three-day curfew to try to stop the spread of the disease.

Viewing all 30150 articles
Browse latest View live