Quantcast
Channel: Pax on both houses
Viewing all 30150 articles
Browse latest View live

Pitiigliano: Tuscany's 'Little Jerusalem' Opens The Doors To Jewish History, NPR

$
0
0
The medieval town of Pitigliano is perched atop a massive volcanic rock, looking out over vineyards and olive groves. It was once home to a vibrant Jewish community, treated with civility or cruelty depending on who was in charge of the city; now, the town works to preserve and share the cultural history of Italian Jews.
The medieval town of Pitigliano is perched atop a massive volcanic rock, looking out over vineyards and olive groves. It was once home to a vibrant Jewish community, treated with civility or cruelty depending on who was in charge of the city; now, the town works to preserve and share the cultural history of Italian Jews.
Audio File:http://www.npr.org/blogs/parallels/2014/09/14/348002796/italys-little-jerusalem-opens-the-doors-to-jewish-history
Twenty-seven European countries are marking the European Day of Jewish Culture on Sunday — an initiative aimed at opening the doors of Jewish communities, heritage sites and culture to the non-Jewish world, as well as deepening Jews' own knowledge of their history in Europe.
One of the most enthusiastic participants is Italy, where some 70 towns and cities are holding festivals, exhibits and concerts linked to Jewish traditions.
Outside of Israel, Italy is believed to have the oldest continuing Jewish presence of any country – more than 2,000 years — with catacombs and a synagogue from ancient Rome, as well as synagogues from the Middle Ages, to the Baroque period and the 20th century.
One of the most unique sites is a medieval town in Tuscany — Pitigliano, also known as Little Jerusalem.
Times Of Tolerance, Times Of Persecution
Pitigliano soars majestically over vineyards and olive groves. Its centuries-old multi-storied buildings seem carved out of a massive volcanic tufa rock first settled by the Etruscans.
In the 16th century, while Venice, Rome and Florence were locking Jews up in ghettos, the Orsinis, enlightened rulers of the independent state of Pitigliano, welcomed Jewish traders and craftsmen to boost the local economy.
A sign in Pitigliano points towards "A Piccola Gerusalemme," or "Little Jerusalem," as well as several restaurants located in the old ghetto.
Sylvia Poggioli/NPR
"They gave them chances to work and open a bank and trading especially in textiles", says tourist guide Paola Blanchi, "and therefore starts this double presence, Jews and Christians all together in a small state".
But Blanchi says that state of civility ended when Pitigliano came under the rule of the Medicis of Florence, who were allied with the Papal State in persecuting Jews.
"[Jews] had to leave their own private property and go and live inside the Jewish quarter, so their trade was no longer so free as it was earlier," he says. And "they had to carry a sign, a yellow sign or tunic."
Pittgliano's best-known delicacy is a stick of pastry filed with honey and walnuts. It's called sfratto — Italian for eviction, recalling the sticks used by Medici officers to knock on Jewish doors and order Jews from their homes and into the ghetto.
A century after the Medicis arrived, Pitigliano again came under enlightened rule. The Grand Duchy of Tuscany granted Jews freedom to live and work where they pleased. At their peak, Jews made up a quarter of Pitigliano's population and enjoyed what came to be known as their golden period.
But by 1938, when the Fascist regime imposed anti-Semitic laws, only 70 Jews were left in Pitigliano.
Today, they're down to four or five.
But every year, tens of thousands of visitors — Jewish and non-Jewish — descend steep stone stairs to visit the Little Jerusalem Association.
Walking Through History And Heritage
The cultural organization comprises the restored synagogue, dating from 1598, and the ritual bath, slaughterhouse and bakery — all three carved out from the tufa rock centuries ago.
In her book Classic Cuisine of the Italian Jews, Edda Servi Machlin recalls her childhood in the 1930s, when the communal oven was in operation only for the week before Passover.
She describes the dangerous but exciting descent down slippery stone steps to a vault-like room that bustled with activity:
"All the Jews of the village would gather, a few families at a time, and prepare their own matzot and all varieties of cookies, sweets and cakes used during the eight days of Passover celebration. Mountains of eggshells would pile up in a few seconds, as everyone went to work with precision and dexterity ... For a few days a procession of enormous wicker baskets full of these goodies would make its way from the cave to the various Jewish residences, leaving a delicious fragrance hovering over the narrow streets — a spectacle that always drew mobs of Christian children to the gateway of the ghetto,"
Judith Elkin, from Poughkeepsie, N.Y., came to visit Pitigliano trying to fill a gap in her knowledge about her Jewish heritage — what came between the stories of the Torah and the time her grandparents emigrated to the U.S. from Europe.
"Out in the diaspora, how did they keep going?" she asks. "I think that is what brings me here. I feel attached — how did they keep going here?"
But most visitors to Pitigliano are not Jewish, like Claudia Malgara, from Milan. Her visit is motivated more by curiosity. "We do not know really the Jewish culture, so it is interesting," she says. "And the memory come back to the people that lived here and now are they dead."
Remembering Jewish Life — Not Just Jewish Deaths
Ruth Ellen Gruber, who writes frequently about Jewish cultural and heritage issues in Europe, says that everything most Italian non-Jews know about Jews is linked to World War II: "You talk about the Holocaust, you talk about death," she says.
Gruber says that Pitigliano is the perfect illustration of the aim of the European day of Jewish Culture — to celebrate Jewish life instead.
Also, she says, it's meant "to promote the idea that Jewish culture is part of European culture, it's not something that is something else. Jews have lived in Europe for centuries, in Italy for millennia — and what developed here is part of the Italian reality, just as the Jewish culture in other parts of Europe is part of European culture."
The day of Jewish Culture has been attracting growing numbers of visitors throughout Europe – last year, 1,000 different events drew close to 100,000 visitors across the continent. And organizers see the annual event as a crucial response to the current surge in anti-Semitism in many parts of Europe.

  • Comments:

I have a Jewish cookbook that credits many of the Italian vegetarian dishes to the ancient Jewish communities in Italy. The use of eggplant and lots of the dairy free desserts it claims were Jewish contributions to the food culture.


  • RuthEllen Gruber  an hour ago

    To see more about Jewish heritage in Europe, explore the web site that I coordinate (as a project of the Rothschild Foundation Europe) --www.jewish-heritage-europe.eu It's a clearing house for information and news about synagogues, Jewish cemeteries, old Jewish quarters and other sites in 48 countries.

  • Hope NoGood  8 minutes ago

    Why are such communities (Jewish or otherwise) dissappear over time?
    This happens to them all over the world .....
    Is it because those communities exclude the rest of local communities due to their religion, etc?
    I am no expert, but may be someone who specialize in this type of
    cultural history could shed some light ....


Harvard Prof. Steven Pinker On Slight Uptick In Violence In A Much More Peaceful World

$
0
0

Harvard Professor Steven Pinker Says We Live In The Least Violent Of All Times
TED Talk

***

"The Better Angels Of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined," Steven Pinker

***

"Shark Attacks Rise Worldwide: Risk Assessment And Aquinas' Criteria For Sin"

***

The Summer Of 2014 Has Been A Messy Time For The World


Audio File:http://www.npr.org/2014/09/13/348286463/the-summer-of-2014-has-been-a-messy-time-for-the-world?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=storiesfromnpr


Syria, Iraq, Ukraine, Liberia, Ferguson: Summer 2014 has been full of terrible news. NPR's Arun Rath talks to Harvard's Steven Pinker to try to answer the question: Is the world getting more messy?
ARUN RATH, HOST:
All recent news about wars, not just in Syria and Iraq, but in Ukraine, Gaza and elsewhere probably has you wondering are things as bad as they seem? Have they ever been this bad? Steven Pinker is a psychologist who spent a lot of time and energy researching the history of human violence, quantifying our rates of killing each other over the millennia. He laid out his findings in a nearly 800-page book, "The Better Angels Of Our Nature" and to skip right to the end, he says we're living in the most peaceful time in human history, but that book came out three years ago.
I asked Pinker, given the more recent situations worldwide, if anything about his findings had changed.
STEVEN PINKER: The major trends of violence have continued to decline, not to reverse. Homicide is down world-wide and its important to remember that homicide kills about five times as many people as wars. More countries and states have abolished capital punishment. Rates of child abuse are down, rates of rape are down, rates of domestic violence are down and when I say down I mean down now compared to four years ago - let alone the preceding decades which saw even greater declines.
Now there's only one category in which the rate of violence has gone up and that's rate of deaths in war, which has crept up a bit because of Syria. But remember that since news is about the stuff that happens, it's not about the stuff that doesn't happen, you don't hear about all the parts in the world where civil wars have fizzled out and have not restarted and that's why even with the horrors of Syria the death rate in war has not gone up by very much. If I could just mention some numbers - during World War II, for example, the rate of death in war was about 300 per 100,000 per year, during the Korean War it was in the twenties, during the Vietnam war in the teens, during the '80s and '90s it was in single digits. In the 2000s, it fell to less than one. Now it's crept up to a tiny bit more than one. That means that its still a 300th of the rate during World War II and a 25th of the rate during the Korean War.
RATH: Steven, do you have faith that violence will continue on this downward trend or what is there to prevent humanity from falling back into a cycle of violence?
PINKER: Well, how likely is it that we're going to start throwing virgins into volcanoes to get good weather or that you're going to have a return of slave markets to New Orleans? I think pretty unlikely. So I don't have faith, but in any of these trends, but I think that there are a number of them that are very likely to continue. I don't think the country is going to put up with the high rates of violence that were tolerated in the '60s and '70s. We now know how to bring it down and we're not going to backslide. I don't think there's going to be a return of great power war. I mean, a lot of what you're seeing in Ukraine as the result of the fact that not even the most hawkish of American hawks are proposing that we fight Russia on the battlefield like great powers did prior to World War I.
On the other hand, there are certain categories of violence that are quite unpredictable and here I would not be willing to predict that the trends would necessarily continue. Civil wars are a lot harder to control than wars between countries. There are only about 200 countries in the world and that's a small number of actors to decide that war is a stupid way to resolve disputes. On the other hand, in a world of seven billion people there's no end to the number of popular liberation fonts that could pop up, get their hands on lots of semi-automatic weapons and create mayhem in some local part of the world. Likewise I don't think that terrorism is going to vanish because again in a world of seven billion people it's very easy for some disaffected, 25-year-old men to decide to raise hell and get a lot of attention to this or that cause, so very much depends on the category of violence.
RATH: That's Steven Pinker, author and professor of psychology at Harvard. Steven, thank you so much.
PINKER: Oh, thanks for having me.

Shark (Scroll To The Right To Get Full View)

Wisdom In The Information Age And The Decisive Importance Of Storytelling

$
0
0

Wisdom in the Age of Information and the Importance of Storytelling in Making Sense of the World: An Animated Essay

by 
Thoughts on navigating the open sea of knowledge.
For my part in the 2014 Future of Storytelling Summit, I had the pleasure of collaborating with animator Drew Christie — the talent behind that wonderful short film about Mark Twain and the myth of originality — on an animated essay that I wrote and narrated, exploring a subject close to my heart and mind: the question of how we can cultivate true wisdom in the age of information and why great storytellers matter more than ever in helping us make sense of an increasingly complex world. It comes as an organic extension of the seven most important life-learnings from the first seven years of Brain Pickings. Full essay text below — please enjoy.
We live in a world awash with information, but we seem to face a growing scarcity of wisdom. And what’s worse, we confuse the two. We believe that having access to more information produces more knowledge, which results in more wisdom. But, if anything, the opposite is true — more and more information without the proper context and interpretation only muddles our understanding of the world rather than enriching it.
This barrage of readily available information has also created an environment where one of the worst social sins is to appear uninformed. Ours is a culture where it’s enormously embarrassing not to have an opinion on something, and in order to seem informed, we form our so-called opinions hastily, based on fragmentary bits of information and superficial impressions rather than true understanding.
“Knowledge,” Emerson wrote, “is the knowing that we can not know.”
To grasp the importance of this, we first need to define these concepts as a ladder of understanding.
At its base is a piece of information, which simply tells us some basic fact about the world. Above that is knowledge — the understanding of how different bits of information fit together to reveal some truth about the world. Knowledge hinges on an act of correlation and interpretation. At the top is wisdom, which has a moral component — it is the application of information worth remembering and knowledgethat matters to understanding not only how the world works, but also how it should work. And that requires a moral framework of what should and shouldn’t matter, as well as an ideal of the world at its highest potentiality.
This is why the storyteller is all the more urgently valuable today.
A great storyteller — whether a journalist or editor or filmmaker or curator — helps people figure out not only what matters in the world, but also why it matters. A great storyteller dances up the ladder of understanding, from information to knowledge to wisdom. Through symbol, metaphor, and association, the storyteller helps us interpret information, integrate it with our existing knowledge, and transmute that into wisdom.
Susan Sontag once said that “reading sets standards.” Storytelling not only sets standards but, at its best, makes us want to live up to them, to transcend them.
A great story, then, is not about providing information, though it can certainly inform — a great story invites an expansion of understanding, a self-transcendence. More than that, it plants the seed for it and makes it impossible to do anything but grow a new understanding — of the world, of our place in it, of ourselves, of some subtle or monumental aspect of existence.
At a time when information is increasingly cheap and wisdom increasingly expensive, this gap is where the modern storyteller’s value lives.
I think of it this way:
Information is having a library of books on shipbuilding. Knowledge applies that to building a ship. Access to the information — to the books — is a prerequisite for the knowledge, but not a guarantee of it.
Once you’ve built your ship, wisdom is what allows you to sail it without sinking, to protect it from the storm that creeps up from the horizon in the dead of the night, to point it just so that the wind breathes life into its sails.
Moral wisdom helps you tell the difference between the right direction and the wrong direction in steering the ship.
A great storyteller is the kindly captain who sails her ship with tremendous wisdom and boundless courage; who points its nose in the direction of horizons and worlds chosen with unflinching idealism and integrity; who brings us somewhat closer to the answer, to our particular answer, to that grand question: Why are we here?

C.S. Lewis On True Friendship

$
0
0

C.S. Lewis on True Friendship

“What is so delicious as a just and firm encounter of two, in a thought, in a feeling?”Emerson marveled in his exquisite meditation on friendship. But what, exactly, is at the heart of this "just and firm encounter"?
In his insightful 1960 book The Four Loves(public library), C.S. Lewis picks up where Aristotle left off and examines the differences between the four main categories of intimate human bonds – affection, the most basic and expressive; Eros, the passionate and sometimes destructive desire of lovers; charity, the highest and most unselfish spiritual connection; and friendship, the rarest, least jealous, and most profound relation.
In one of the most beautiful passages, he considers how friendship differs from the other three types of love by focusing on its central question: "Do you see the same truth."
Lewis writes:
Lovers seek for privacy. Friends find this solitude about them, this barrier between them and the herd, whether they want it or not.
[...]
In a circle of true Friends each man is simply what he is: stands for nothing but himself. No one cares twopence about anyone else’s family, profession, class, income, race, or previous history. Of course you will get to know about most of these in the end. But casually. They will come out bit by bit, to furnish an illustration or an analogy, to serve as pegs for an anecdote; never for their own sake. That is the kingliness of Friendship. We meet like sovereign princes of independent states, abroad, on neutral ground, freed from our contexts. This love (essentially) ignores not only our physical bodies but that whole embodiment which consists of our family, job, past and connections. At home, besides being Peter or Jane, we also bear a general character; husband or wife, brother or sister, chief, colleague, or subordinate. Not among our Friends. It is an affair of disentangled, or stripped, minds. Eros will have naked bodies; Friendship naked personalities.
Hence (if you will not misunderstand me) the exquisite arbitrariness and irresponsibility of this love. I have no duty to be anyone’s Friend and no man in the world has a duty to be mine. No claims, no shadow of necessity. Friendship is unnecessary, like philosophy, like art, like the universe itself... It has no survival value; rather it is one of those things which gave value to survival.
The Four Loves is a superb read in its entirety, provocative at times but invariably thoughtful throughout. Complement it with Andrew Sullivan onwhy friendship is a greater gift than romantic love and a curious history ofthe convergence of the two in "romantic friendship," then revisit Lewis onsuffering and what free will really meansthe secret of happinessthe key to authenticity in writing, and his ideal daily routine.


Anne Truitt On Compassion, Humility And How To Cure Our Chronic Self-Righeousness

$
0
0

Yeshua Excoriates Fellow Pharisees: "The Woe Passages"

***

Anne Truitt on Compassion, Humility, and How to Cure Our Chronic Self-Righteousness

by 
“Love … is the honoring of others in a way that grants them the grace of their own autonomy and allows mutual discovery.”
Countless great minds have attested to the creative and psychological value of keeping a diary, but few have manifested that more beautifully than artist Anne Truitt — perhaps in large part because Truitt’s formal training as a psychologist before she turned to art gave her higher-order powers of introspection and self-awareness, which, coupled with an artist’s penchant for patient observation, produced a true masterwork of psychological insight.
In one particularly poignant sequence of diary entries Daybook: The Journal of an Artist(public library) — the same soul-stretching collection of reflections on the creative life that gave us Truitt on the difference between doing art and being an artist — she examines the art of humility and the perils of self-righteousness as a gateway to true human connection, the elixir that makes possible what Adrienne Rich would so memorably describe mere months later as “an honorable human relationship.”
In early August of 1974, 53-year-old Truitt recalls a symbolic moment from her childhood and considers how we inadvertently engineer our own myths, and not always healthy ones, by letting others define us:
As I work to understand my life, its scale seems to diminish, as a tree I gaze up into flattens when I walk up a mountain and look down on it. Humility is really more natural than pride, which seems to me always to involve a lie.
I remember when this lie began for me. I was in my mother’s bedroom, standing in front of a gold-bordered pier glass. It was early afternoon. The light was sunny. It was warm. I had on a white batiste undergarment, all one piece with a drop seat. The neck and arms were edged with narrow lace, and the same lace was on the ruffles gathered by elastic around my legs. I was being dressed for a party. My dress lay on the bed behind me, a translucent white cloud. My mother and my nurse were paying a new kind of attention to me, the same flavor of attention now paid to me at the openings of my exhibits. They were arranging my thin whitish blond hair into a “roach” curl, which was to run from the back of my head along its crown to the center of my forehead. They brushed my hair up, used a little water to hold it, and brushed again. The curl was totally artificial and had to be forced into being. Admonished to stand still, puzzled by their excited determination (very unlike the usual matter-of-fact tenor of the household), I addressed my image in the mirror.
I had never, to my recollection, seen myself before. I looked all right to myself in general; my feeling for my body seemed pretty well matched by what I saw. In fact, I was interested and would have been glad to have been left alone to look. But the chirps about the curl went on and on, and I began to feel uncomfortable. Something was being added to me. They wanted me to be more, and the “more” was the curl. I began to want the curl too, and I remember the first sick feeling of anxiety as they worked to get it to stick there. My healthy self felt whole without it, and recognized quite clearly that I was being made a fool of. But I was fascinated by being praised. The whole room danced with how cute I was. I knew I had done nothing except to stand there. I hadn’t made the hair to begin with, much less the curl. But there it was; I began to want to please in order to get praise. I began to participate in the lie that I was something special, to take that role, to accept what I did not want and did not even think right for myself, in order to taste the sickly sweet flavor of praise.
I remember turning around from the mirror to the bed as they lifted the dress and held it out for me to step into. I held my head stiff with pride.
[...]
The roach curl is the earliest remembered strand of a web I wove to add on to what I was, what others wanted me to be. The idea that I must meet arbitrary requirements caught fire from my clear recognition that I was very small and powerless; and it coalesced into the fear that if I failed to meet these mysterious requirements I would be abandoned.
Truitt observes that we turn the same tendency outward, in how we relate to and assess others, indulging a dangerous and presumptuous compulsion to impose on their identity our own shoulds, adding to history’s most elegant definitions of love:
Unless we are very, very careful, we doom each other by holding onto images of one another based on preconceptions that are in turn based on indifference to what is other than ourselves. This indifference can be, in its extreme, a form of murder and seems to me a rather common phenomenon. We claim autonomy for ourselves and forget that in so doing we can fall into the tyranny of defining other people as we would like them to be. By focusing on what we choose to acknowledge in them, we impose an insidious control on them. I notice that I have to pay careful attention in order to listen to others with an openness that allows them to be as they are, or as they think themselves to be. The shutters of my mind habitually flip open and click shut, and these little snaps form into patterns I arrange for myself. The opposite of this inattention is love, is the honoring of others in a way that grants them the grace of their own autonomy and allows mutual discovery.
[...]
Compassion is one of the purest springs of love.
Illustration by Maurice Sendak from 'We Are All in the Dumps with Jack and Guy,' an unusual story about compassion and love. Click image for more.
Recounting another childhood memory, Truitt reflects on the cruelty of judgmental opinions, which seem to come to us almost automatically — something all the more palpably true half a century later, in our present age when people feel increasingly entitled to passing public judgment on others, in a culture where it’s so much easier to be a critic than a celebrator. This tragic automation of the human psyche, Truitt suggests, is constantly conditioned by peer pressure — one that good-personhood requires we actively counter:
Why didn’t Miss Perry marry Mr. Lockhart, who sat in the sun outside his hardware store all day? And I could make people laugh by saying, “Because he’s too fat,” tickling myself with pleasure while feeling sick because I never passed him without feeling deep compassion, so short on his little stool, so round a cannonball of stomach resting on his patiently parted knees. Why doesn’t she marry him, I asked myself in a different part of myself, feeling the sere waste of their lives, his resignation to his lonely stool, hers to her sewing machine and to her stolid, passive mother.
The judgments I copied, then learned to make as I observed others make them, with just enough of myself in them to make them amusing or interesting contributions to conversation, began as fragments. It took time and effort to make them fit into cohesive plaques of personality that would be hailed with little cries of recognition and appreciation. It was a lot more difficult than the curl, but the effect was the same: I had to hold myself stiff, but I got the praise. And saved myself from being outcast.
In a diary entry two days later, Truitt revisits the subject of self-righteousness, distilling with piercing poignancy the essence of compassion and empathy:
I have always been mystified by the speed with which people condemn one another. Feeling as righteous as Christ chastising the money-changers in the temple, they cast their fellows into the outer darkness of their disapproval. This seems to give them intense pleasure. Whenever I am tempted by this pleasure, I remember some impulse in myself that could have led me, granted certain circumstances, into the condemned position. This has caused me to distrust the part of myself that would relish self-righteousness.

Daybook is rich and revelational beyond words from cover to cover. Complement this particular excerpt with Anna Deavere Smith on the discipline of not letting others define you and Anne Lamott on how we keep ourselves small by people-pleasing.

Maurice Sendak’s Darkest, Most Controversial Yet Most Hopeful Children’s Book

$
0
0


Maurice Sendak’s Darkest, Most Controversial Yet Most Hopeful Children’s Book

by 
A moving cry for mercy, for light, and for resurrection of the human spirit at a time of hopeless darkness.
One of Maurice Sendak‘s most misunderstood qualities, yet also arguably the very same one that rendered him one of the most innovative and influential storytellers of all time, was his deep faith in children’s resilience and his unflinching refusal to allow the fears and self-censorship of grownups to sugarcoat the world for children, who he believed possess enormous emotional intelligence in processing the dark — an evolution of Tolkien’s assertion that there is no such thing as writing “for children,” which Sendak echoed in his final interview, indignantly telling Stephen Colbert: “I don’t write for children. I write — and somebody says, ‘That’s for children!'”
But while many of Sendak’s books have been deemed controversial precisely out of this misunderstanding, from the banning of In the Night Kitchen to the outrage over his sensual illustrations of Melville, no book of his has drawn a thicker cloud of controversy than the 1993 masterwork We Are All in the Dumps with Jack and Guy (public library) — an unusual fusion of two traditional Mother Goose nursery rhymes, “In the Dumps” and “Jack and Gye,” reimagined and interpreted by Sendak’s singular sensibility, with enormously rich cultural and personal subtext.
Created at the piercing pinnacle of the AIDS plague and amid an epidemic of homelessness, it is a highly symbolic, sensitive tale that reads almost like a cry for mercy, for light, for resurrection of the human spirit at a time of incomprehensible heartbreak and grimness. It is, above all, a living monument to hope — one built not on the denial of hopelessness but on its delicate demolition.
On a most basic level, the story follows a famished black baby, part of a clan of homeless children dressed in newspaper and living in boxes, kidnapped by a gang of giant rats. Jack and Guy, who are strolling nearby and first brush the homeless kids off, witness the kidnapping and set out to rescue the boy. But the rats challenge them to a rigged game of bridge, with the child as the prize. After a series of challenges that play out across a number of scary scenes, Jack and Guy emerge victorious and save the boy with the help of the omniscient Moon and a mighty white cat that chases the rats away.
But the book’s true magic lies in its integration of Sendak’s many identities — the son of Holocaust survivors, a gay man witnessing the devastation of AIDS, a deft juggler of darkness and light.
St. Paul’s Bakery and Orphanage, where the story is set, is a horrible place reminiscent of Auschwitz. In the game of bridge, “diamonds are trumps,” a phrase with a poignant double meaning, subtly implicating the avarice of the world’s diamond-slingers and Donald Trumps in the systemic social malady of homelessness — something reflected in the clever wordplay of the book’s title itself, suggesting that homelessness isn’t limited to the homeless but is a problem we’re all in together, equally responsible for its solution.
Jack and Guy appear like a gay couple, and their triumph in rescuing the child resembles an adoption, two decades before that was an acceptable subject for a children’s book. “And we’ll bring him up / As other folk do,” the final pages read — and, once again, a double meaning reveals itself as two characters are depicted with wings on their backs, lifting off into the sky, lending the phrase “we’ll bring him up” an aura of salvation. In the end, the three curl up as a makeshift family amidst a world that is still vastly imperfect but full of love.
We are all in the dumps
For diamonds are thumps
The kittens are gone to St. Paul’s!
The baby is bit
The moon’s in a fit
And the houses are built
Without walls
Jack and Guy
Went out in the Rye
And they found a little boy
With one black eye
Come says Jack let’s knock
Him on the head
No says Guy
Let’s buy him some bread
You buy one loaf
And I’ll buy two
And we’ll bring him up
As other folk do
In many ways, this is Sendak’s most important and most personal book. In fact, Sendak would resurrect the characters of Jack and Guy two decades later in his breathtaking final book, a posthumously published love letter to the world and to his partner of fifty years, Eugene Glynn. Jack and Guy, according toplaywright Tony Kushner, a dear friend of Sendak’s, represented the two most important people in the beloved illustrator’s life — Jack was his real-life brother Jack, whose death devastated Sendak, and Guy was Eugene, the love of Sendak’s life, who survived him after half a century of what would have been given the legal dignity of a marriage had Sendak lived to see the dawn of marriage equality. (Sendak died thirteen months before the defeat of DOMA.)
All throughout, the book emanates Sendak’s greatest lifelong influence — like the verses and drawings of William Blake, Sendak’s visual poetry in We Are All in the Dumps with Jack and Guy is deeply concerned with the human spirit and, especially, with the plight of children.
Complement this many-layered gem with more of Sendak’s lesser-known work, including his beautiful posters celebrating the joy of reading, his unreleased drawings, his formative, rare vintage illustrations for William Blake’s “Songs of Innocence” and his provocative art for Melville’s Pierre.

New Yorker Cartoon: Hell Is What You Think (And What You'd Never Expect)

$
0
0
 
“I should have known—I hate the beach."

***

Alan: I have not been able to source a decades-old memory of an Islamic saying:
"You will not die until you manifest the faults you find in others."




New Yorker Cartoon: Follow Your Bliss

New Yorker Cartoon: Every Man Needs A Stunt Double

$
0
0
“As my stunt double, you’ll be doing all of my press conferences, court appearances, and family reunions.”



New Yorker Cartoon: Wait Til You See The Underbelly You Can't See

New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest, September 15, 2014

$
0
0
"Get thee behind me, Satan!"

The aftermath.



Building A Toaster From Scratch. Armageddon Cheerleaders & Shoulders We Stand On

$
0
0

More From This Episode

About Thomas Thwaites' TED Talk
Designer Thomas Thwaites explains what compelled him to build a toaster, literally from the ground up.
About Thomas Thwaites
Designer Thomas Thwaites works on projects that look deeply at the science behind technology, such as his Toaster Project, where he set out to build his own toaster from scratch, and Policing Genes, a thought experiment around amateur genetics. He's also working on a project investigating counterfactual histories in science, supported by the Wellcome Trust.

Vermont's Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders May Seek U.S. Presidency In 2016

$
0
0
U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs Chairman Senator Bernie Sanders leads a hearing on ''The State of VA Health Care'' on Capitol Hill in Washington, September 9, 2014.   REUTERS/Jim Bourg
U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs Chairman Senator Bernie Sanders leads a hearing on ''The State of VA Health Care'' on Capitol Hill in Washington, September 9, 2014.




(Reuters) - Bernie Sanders, one of the Senate's leading liberals, said on Sunday he is thinking about running for U.S. president in 2016 as either a Democrat or an independent in a move that could complicate Hillary Clinton's path to the White House.
Sanders, an independent from Vermont, could pose a challenge from the left to Clinton, widely seen as the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination. She has not officially said she is a candidate but has acted very much like one.
"I think anybody who speaks to the needs of the working class and the middle class of this country and shows the courage to take on the billionaire class, I think that candidate will do pretty well," Sanders told the NBC program "Meet the Press," giving a possible preview of his message in the 2016 campaign.
Sanders is serving his second six-year term in the Senate. He has cultivated a following among some American liberals, especially on economic issues like the growing income disparity between rich and poor and corporate greed. He is a self-described socialist who caucuses with Democrats in the Senate.
"I am thinking about running for president," Sanders said, adding that he must decide whether to run as an independent or wade into the fight for the Democratic nomination.
Sanders is testing the waters in Iowa, a state that holds an important early contest in the nomination process.
"One of the reasons I'm going to Iowa is to get a sense of how people feel about it," he said of his candidacy. "Look, the truth is (there is) profound anger at both political parties, more and more people are becoming independent. The negative is: how do you set up a 50-state infrastructure as an independent?"
Sanders said he has "a lot of respect" for Clinton, but said, "The issue is not Hillary."
With Clinton mindful of the need to appeal to moderates in any general election battle against a Republican in 2016, a Sanders candidacy could force her to the left in the Democratic primaries to head off his challenge.
Conversely, if he runs in the general election as an independent, he could siphon away from her votes from liberals that she could need to beat any Republican nominee.
American liberals have expressed disappointment with President Barack Obama on a range of issues, most recently on his decision to postpone any executive action on immigration even as Republican leaders in the House of Representatives block action on a bipartisan Senate-passed plan.
Sanders said that he has "a lot of disagreements" with Obama, adding: "I think he has not tapped the anger and the frustration that the American people feel on many, many issues."

Cops Handcuff "Django Unchained" Actress Because They Assumed She Was A Hooker

$
0
0
Danièle Watts arrest Facebook
An African-American actress and her white boyfriend have accused two Studio City policemen of detaining her after watching her make out with him, believing she was a prostitute with a client.
Danièle Watts, star of Quentin Tarantino’s Django Unchained, wrote on her Facebook page that she was handcuffed and thrown into the back of a police cruiser after failing to provide the officers with ID, according to The YBF.
In her posting, Watts wrote, “Today I was handcuffed and detained by 2 police officers from the Studio City Police Department after refusing to agree that I had done something wrong by showing affection, fully clothed, in a public place. When the officer arrived, I was standing on the sidewalk by a tree. I was talking to my father on my cell phone. I knew that I had done nothing wrong, that I wasn’t harming anyone, so I walked away. A few minutes later, I was still talking to my dad when 2 different police officers accosted me and forced me into handcuffs.”
According to Watts, she refused to show officers ID  — saying she had done nothing wrong — before being placed, crying, in the back of a police cruiser only to  eventually be released.
Writing on his own Facebook page, her boyfriend, Chef Brian James Lucas elaborated,  “Today, Daniele Watts & I were accosted by police officers after showing our affection publicly. From the questions that he asked me as D was already on her phone with her dad, I could tell that whoever called on us (including the officers), saw a tatted RAWKer white boy and a hot bootie shorted black girl and thought we were a HO (prostitute) & a TRICK (client).”
Lucas also included a photo  of an injury to Watts’ arm the result of being roughly cuffed by the officer.
Watts, who also appeared on Showtime’s Weeds and will be seen in Partners with Martin Lawrence and Kelsey Grammer on FX, said she sat in the back of the cruiser remembering when her father had been harassed due to his skin color.
“I remembered the countless times my father came home frustrated or humiliated by the cops when he had done nothing wrong, ” she wrote. ” I felt his shame, his anger, and my own feelings of frustration for existing in a world where I have allowed myself to believe that “authority figures” could control my BEING… my ability to BE!!!!!!!”
According to Lucas, who believes that they were singled out because they are a mixed-race couple,  they have been in contact with 3 lawyers, the ACLU, and the NAACP.



Maruchan Ramen: My Go-To Comfort Food

$
0
0

 "Welfare Noodles"
My favorite brand and flavor.

***

10 Interesting Facts About Instant Ramen 

Posted: 
Everyone loves ramen these days. Classic ramen restaurants populate the country's biggest cities, and people love the instant stuff so much they have turned it into a hamburger bun, a lobster roll and even a burrito. We just can't get enough of the salty and addictive noodles.


And as we all learned in college, instant ramen noodles are there for you, waiting to be cooked and ready to be eaten in just five minutes. Here are 10 things you never knew about your favorite go-to food, even if you eat it every day.
1. The first instant ramen was considered a luxury item in supermarkets.
476964185
Although today it's considered a college staple and something you eat if you're broke,instant ramen used to be quite expensive in Japan. Momofuku Ando, the creator of Nissin ramen products, invented "Chicken Ramen," an instant snack that could be eaten easily and anywhere in 1958, when he noticed food was scarce after World War II. But when it arrived on Japanese supermarket shelves, it was seen as a very expensive product since fresh udon noodles sold for one-sixth the cost of "Chicken Ramen."
2. It's the best-selling item at Rikers prison.
The commissary at Rikers Island in New York needs to always make sure it is stocked up on Cup Noodles. It sells for 35 cents and, according to the New York Post, it's the most popular food item sold. Prison guards provide the prisoners with hot water to eat their beloved ramen. And sometimes, inmates discard the noodles and use the intense seasoning packets to flavor the bland prison cafeteria food.
3. Only the "Oriental" and "Chili" flavors of Nissin Top Ramen are vegetarian.
It may be hard to believe that the Nissin seasoning packets in the "Chicken,""Beef" and "Shrimp" flavors actually contain animal products, but they do. The "Chicken" flavor includes chicken fat and/or powder, the "Beef" flavor includes beef fat and/or powder and the "Shrimp" flavor includes shrimp powder. Remember: We're only talking about the Nissin brand, not Maruchan.
4. Some people (like David Chang) like to eat ramen without even cooking it.
Chang, founder of the Momofuku restaurant empire, explains in "Mind of a Chef,"the appeal of biting into a chunk of uncooked ramen sprinkled with seasoning as an after-school snack:
"I think I was around eight years old. I'd come home from school and instead of having Hot Pockets and stuff, I had ramen. I didn't know it was bad for you to consume as a kid. I thought it was good for you."
5. Ramen is the Japanese word for Chinese "lo mein."
The Japanese owe it to the Chinese for the trendy food's name. According to "Being Japanese American," by Gil Asakawa, ramen is the Japanese pronunciation of the kanji characters for "lo mein" or "lau mein" in Chinese. However, there are competing theories, and other authors feel the most likely etymology is "lamian." Whichever is the case, it's no surprise that ramen is inspired by lo-mein, another boiled noodle dish invented centuries ago.
6. And China eats instant ramen more than any other country.
tongnoodle
China's global demand for instant noodles is the highest, according to the World Instant Noodles Association (yes, that's a real thing). In 2013, China consumed more than 46 billion packets of ramen. Tong-Yi Instant Noodles, a popular Chinese brand, is sold almost everywhere, from Walmart to street stalls.
7. According to one survey, the Japanese consider ramen their best invention.
Aside from all the technology Japan has gifted the world, in 2000 the Fuji Research Institute stated that Japanese people are the proudest of introducing instant noodles to the world. They feel this way because instant noodles truly "represent 'Made in Japan,'" by not only being a national food but a global one.
8. It would cost you only about $140 a year if you ate ramen for every meal.
It's a fact that instant ramen is cheap. Maybe that's why businesses are considered "ramen-profitable" when they are taking in more money than they are spending. And since it usually costs the consumer about 13 cents a package (depending on where they live), it will only cost you $142.65 dollars a year if you decide to live off of it. To put this in perspective: The average American spends $7,852 on food a year.
9. There's a whole museum in Osaka, Japan dedicated to Cup Noodles.
It's called the CupNoodles Museum, and it's dedicated to the history of the product and the mind of Momofuku Ando. The museum showcases a "My CUPNOODLES Factory," where visitors can make their own ramen concoctions and include cute customized naruto (fish cake) pieces with animals printed on them. The museum website states that there are 5,460 flavor combinations.
10. The first noodles ever consumed in space were instant ramen noodles.
manking
Momofuku Ando wanted to make ramen portable and easy to eat not only on earth, but also in space, and he succeeded in 2005. Two years before he died, Ando created "Space Ram," a vacuum-packed ramen made with smaller noodles (so they can be cooked without using boiled water) and a thicker broth (to prevent dispersal). It was made for Japanese astronaut Soichi Noguchi's trip in the Discovery space shuttle.
Bonus: Justin Timberlake's hair in the '90s was an unintentional advertisement for instant ramen.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/10/ramen-facts_n_5784632.html



Why Obamacare Remains Unpopular (At Least With The Wealthy)

$
0
0
Alan: If wealthy Americans don't want higher premiums as part of the Affordable Care Act's plan to subsidize The Common Good they can "repeal and replace" Obamacare with a single payer system which will cut everyone's healthcare cost in half. 


"Obama's Preference For Single Payer"

***

"Progressives And Conservatives Agree: Single Payer Is Inevitable"

***

Obamacare's failure to collapse doesn't mean success. "It’s true: Obamacare isn’t collapsing. But in the real world, we don’t measure the success of the 'Affordable Care Act' by its failure to collapse. We measure it by looking at the underlying affordability of American health care....The story is more complicated than either side would like you to believe. It is a good thing that premiums on Obamacare’s exchanges aren’t rising rapidly for 2015. But premiums did go up a lot in 2014. And they may go up again, as the 'three R' program phases out. The bottom line is that if you shop for coverage on your own, and you don’t qualify for Obamacare’s subsidies, you’re probably paying a lot more for insurance today than you did before. And that’s why Obamacare remains unpopular." Avik Roy inForbes.


***

"Nearly Three Quarters Of Americans With Individudal Plans Qualify For Obamacare Subsidies"
11/21/12013

***




The Economic Elite's Insistence On Global Warming

$
0
0
The coast is clear.

***

"What is wrong with us? I think the answer is far more simple than many have led us to believe: we have not done the things needed to cut emissions because those things fundamentally conflict with deregulated capitalism, the reigning ideology for the entire period we have struggled to find a way out of this crisis. We are stuck, because the actions that would give us the best chance of averting catastrophe — and benefit the vast majority — are threatening to an elite minority with a stranglehold over our economy, political process and media." Naomi Klein in The Guardian.



Almost Every American Has Been Mugged And Robbed By Smiley-Faced Felons

$
0
0

"The Smirk-Smiley Face Of America's Most Despicable Felon"

***

The roughed-up American. "The gap applies to countless middle-class Americans. Having been roughed up, they face years of catch-up to get to where they once were. They feel poorer because they are poorer. They feel less secure because they are less secure. The crisis’s severity — and the fact that it surprised most 'experts'— shocked them. The large income and wealth losses compounded their sense of vulnerability. Their stubborn caution makes forecasting the economy’s future harder. The financial crisis and Great Recession have powerfully affected the national psyche — for the worse. We will be living with that legacy for a long time." Robert J. Samuelson in The Washington Post.


Ferguson Seems To Have Mobilized A New Civil-Rights Era

$
0
0
Chicago Mayor Richard J. Daley in the wake of 1968 DNC riots

***

"Bad Black People"
Why Bill O'Reilly Is Wrong Even When He's Right

***

Ferguson spawned a new civil-rights era? "Evidence suggests that Ferguson both disturbed and mobilized a nation....Officers around the country and in Ferguson are donning body cameras, and communities...are giving back their military-grade hand-me-downs. Moreover, a new generation of activists, who were not weaned on the nonviolence of the Civil Rights Era, is coming to the fore and looking to a different protest model....To be sure, the combination of protests, riots, and looting were hardly unifying. Whites continue to be far more likely to condemn the looting than are blacks. But there seems to be more agreement on one thing: Large shares of both blacks and whites thought police went too far in their response." Patrik Jonsson in The Christian Science Monitor.


Viewing all 30150 articles
Browse latest View live