Inside the Trump financial statements that Cohen unveiled
THERE’S STILL A BEAR IN THE WOODS: -- Trump inflated his net worth to lenders and potential business partners by producing “Statements of Financial Condition” that included a number of errors about his financial holdings. David A. Fahrenthold and Jonathan O'Connell report:
The documents, which ran up to 20 pages in length, often omitted information about Trump’s debts or exaggerated the properties he owned. “Trump’s financial statement for 2011 said he had 55 home lots to sell at his golf course in Southern California. Those lots would sell for $3 million or more, the statement said. But Trump had only 31 lots zoned and ready for sale at the course, according to city records. He claimed credit for 24 lots — and at least $72 million in future revenue — he didn’t have. He also claimed his Virginia vineyard had 2,000 acres, when it really has about 1,200. He said Trump Tower has 68 stories. It has 58.”
Both the House Oversight Committee and investigators in New York are probing whether Trump’s reliance on these documents could constitute fraud. “Earlier this month, the New York state Department of Financial Services subpoenaed records from Trump’s longtime insurer, Aon. A person familiar with that subpoena ... said ‘a key component’ was questions about whether Trump had given Aon these documents in an effort to lower his insurance premiums.” The probes stemmed from testimony last month by Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen.
“Financial and legal experts said it’s unclear at this point whether Trump will face any legal consequences. They said it depends on whether Trump intended to mislead or whether the misstatements caused anyone to give him a financial benefit.”
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) responds to a letter from House Intelligence Committee Republicans calling for his resignation following the attorney general's summary of the Mueller report.
Fwd: The Washington Post’s Daily 202: What Trump’s reversal on the Special Olympics reveals about his presidency
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
Greetings,
Government has become the Reality TV Show “Empty Man Scam Artist.” (“The Horror” is what “this” says about his followers - mostly white, absolutist and “Christian.”)
An etymological note...
The Spanish word “soberbio” fits Trump to a “T.”
Being “soberbio” refers to a complex of personality traits including arrogance, superciliousness and presumptuousness - all three of them pervaded by blasé overbearingness.
Surely, the root of “sober” is the Latin word “super/supra” meaning “above” or “over.”
And although I suspect “soberbio’s” “bio” component does not derive from the Greek “bios” meaning “life,” such “interpretation” is, nevertheless, well-suited.
“Sober” “bio.”
“Above” “life.”
The one and only ruler of all “biota.”
When the mind is blind, the eyes do not see.
When the mind is blind, the eyes cannot see.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
PS Even if you’ve read Dr. Seuss’ “Yertle The Turtle,” I encourage you to read it again. “Yertle” is available - with two other fine Seuss stories - in a lovely hardbound edition for under $14. The perfect gift for humane politicization of young people. https://www.amazon.com/Yertle-Turtle-Other-Stories-Seuss/dp/0394800877
THE BIG IDEA: The third time wasn’t the charm. President Trump has asked Congress to cut federal funding for the Special Olympics in all three budgets that he has submitted. But, facing a firestorm, he insisted on Thursday afternoon that he didn’t learn about the controversy until that morning. “I have overridden my people,” Trump told reporters on the South Lawn of the White House. “The Special Olympics will be funded. I just told my people: I want to fund the Special Olympics.” This is a textbook case of an unforced error. Congress was never, ever going to get rid of the money for the Special Olympics, a popular program that enjoys bipartisan support and allows people with intellectual disabilities to compete in athletics. Trump’s sudden reversal, after Education Secretary Betsy DeVos spent three days publicly defending the cut, highlighted 10 deeper truths about his presidency: 1.The president vs. the presidency: It actually seems plausible that Trump didn’t know he had signed off on a budget request that cut the Special Olympics until he saw cable news coverage yesterday of people criticizing him for doing so. If he was telling the truth on the South Lawn, it reflects the extent to which he has outsourced most policymaking to conservative ideologues like acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
2. The buck stops with ... who exactly? DeVos released a statement last night insisting that she was against the Special Olympics cuts all along, and her staff blamed the Office of Management and Budget for including the proposal. “This is funding I have fought for behind the scenes over the last several years,” she said. “I am pleased and grateful the president and I see eye to eye on this issue, and that he’s decided to fund our Special Olympics grant.” Even by Washington standards, this took chutzpah. During testimony earlier in the day before a Senate appropriations panel, DeVos defended the cuts as necessary and argued that private donors like her – she married into the billionaire Amway fortune – would step up to fill the gap. Then she took umbrage at Democratic criticism. “I hope all of this debate encourages lots of private contributions to Special Olympics,” she told Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.). “So let’s not use disabled children in a twisted way for your political narrative. That is just disgusting, and it’s shameful.”
Durbin, DeVos clash over proposed Special Olympics cuts
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
3. Trump is constantly looking to get credit for cleaning up messes of his own making: The president declared that he had decided to save the Special Olympics as he left the White House to fly to Michigan for a rally to support his reelection campaign. Then, in Grand Rapids last night, Trump announced that he’s going to make sure the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative is fully funded. Trump’s budget earlier this month proposed slashing that program, which funds the cleanup of the Great Lakes, by 90 percent – from $300 million to $30 million. “We have some breaking news! You ready? Can you handle it? I don’t think you can handle it,” he said, according to the Cleveland Plain Dealer. “I support the Great Lakes. Always have! They are beautiful. They are big, very deep, record deepness, right? And I am going to get, in honor of my friends, full funding of $300 million for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, which you have been trying to get for over 30 years. So we will get it done.” During his first year in office, Trump called for eliminating the program entirely. Last year and this year, he asked Congress to cut it by 90 percent. But Republicans and Democrats on the Hill teamed up to fully fund it over White House objections. This is part of a pattern. Remember when Trump ended the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and then attacked Democrats for not protecting the “dreamers” from deportations that he put them at risk for? Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
President Trump speaks to supporters during a rally at the Van Andel Arena in Grand Rapids, Mich. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
4. Trump, in reelection mode, makes decisions through a political prism: The president has better raw political instincts than the guys on his staff who wear the green eyeshades. He likely recognized that the Special Olympics cut could be used as fodder in campaign commercials to portray him as callous and heartless. The 2020 Democratic candidates have already been driving this argument. Likewise, he’s understandably fixated on winning the industrial Midwest. His opposition to the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative threatened to cost him votes in Michigan and Ohio, where the program is overwhelmingly popular across the ideological spectrum. It’s a fresh reminder of how Trump can turn on a dime. He pivoted effortlessly from portraying Bob Mueller as the leader of a “witch hunt” to describing him as an honorable man, for example. The conventional wisdom that Trump never backs down is also wrong. He often folds when he decides it makes sense politically.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
5. Audacity, always audacity: The president has stocked his political team with operatives who share his zeal for counterpunching. It’s this mentality that prompted the Trump reelection campaign’s deputy communications director, Matt Wolking, to accuse Democrats of hypocrisy yesterday for wanting to fund the Special Olympics while simultaneously supporting abortion rights. “I’m sure Democrats who see abortion as the cure for Down syndrome and other disabilities are sincerely concerned about kids having the chance to be in the Special Olympics,” Wolking tweeted. “The Special Olympics proves people with disabilities can live meaningful, fulfilling lives. It’s a powerful monument to the value of all lives — the same lives Democrats are fine with seeing snuffed out.” These comments offended many Democrats who identify as pro-choice and who have children or relatives with Down syndrome. Moreover, they came just hours before Trump changed course. Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
President Trump holds up the Federal Commission on School Safety report while Betsy DeVos listens during a roundtable discussion in the Roosevelt Room at the White House in December. (Al Drago/Bloomberg)
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
6. No one can really speak for Trump – but Trump: He routinely contradicts or otherwise undercuts his top aides. Trump has often said that his own spokespeople cannot speak for him, which makes it harder for people like Wolking to spin reporters. DeVos is far from the first Cabinet secretary to get thrown under the bus. That makes it hard for presidential emissaries, even Vice President Pence, to negotiate credibly on his behalf when they’re on Capitol Hill or in foreign capitals. When Rex Tillerson was secretary of state, recall how Trump publicly chastised his own diplomat’s efforts to engage with North Korea. He called it a waste of time – a few months before doing so himself.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
7. It’s still not clear that Trump understands how the appropriations process works: “I just authorized a funding,” the president told reporters of the Special Olympics. But Trump does not get to appropriate funds. The Constitution makes clear that this is Congress’s most important function. This has come up recently with the president’s declaration of a national emergency to try building a border wall that a majority of the House has explicitly rejected.
8. Budget proposals are statements of principles and values. By definition, they’re aspirational. And this was just the tip of the iceberg. The Special Olympics line item is only $17.6 million. The Trump budget released this month asked Congress to cut Education Department spending by more than $8.5 billion from this year, or about 12 percent. Among the initiatives that Trump said should go on the chopping block: the Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program, which underwrites school safety efforts, including mental-health services. He also wants to take the ax to after-school activities for children who live in impoverished communities, which are designed to keep at-risk teens off the streets and out of trouble. And he wants a $7.5 million cut to the National Technical Institute for the Deaf, a $13 million cut for Gallaudet University in the District and a $5 million cut for the American Printing House for the Blind, a federal program that produces books for blind students. During a House subcommittee hearing to review the Trump budget on Tuesday, Republican Chairman Tom Cole (Okla.) said that, while some of the proposed reductions make sense, others are “somewhat shortsighted.”
Special Olympics community responds to controversial budget cuts
9.) Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
. “One of the reasons the special education cuts drew fire this week was because DeVos had found money to support her own pet projects,” Valerie Strauss explains. “She proposed creating a controversial new federal tax-credit program, which, capped at $5 billion, would allow the use of public money for private and religious schooling. She also proposed adding $60 million to the Charter Schools Program, which funds the creation and expansion of charter schools. Some critics said they were angered that DeVos found money to support the expansion of alternatives to traditional public school districts, which enroll most U.S. schoolchildren, while cutting special education.” 10. Outside the Education Department, the Trump budget advocates slashing a host of other programs that benefit the disabled. “The administration wants to zero out funding for Department of Health and Human Services programs relating to autism, including a developmental disabilities surveillance and research program, autism education, early detection and intervention, and the interagency autism coordinating committee,” Jacqueline Alemany reports in her Power Up newsletter, citing figures provided by the Arc, a nonprofit advocacy group. “Trump proposed various cuts to Development Disabilities Act Programs within HHS over the past two budgets. His current budget proposal is seeking a 30 percent cut to the Office of Disability Employment within the Department of Labor and a $10 billion dollar cut to Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program, which provides benefits to disable workers. … The 2020 budget also proposes cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, which provides health care coverage to those with disabilities.”
DeVos grilled over proposed cuts to Special Olympics: 'Why are we cutting all of these programs?'
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
-- Overshadowed by the Special Olympics donnybrook: During her Senate appearance yesterday, DeVos also acknowledged that she has not begun implementing an Obama-era regulation designed to ensure children of color are not disproportionately punished or sent to special-education classrooms – despite a judge’s rebukeand a court order to do so. “Three weeks ago, a federal court ruled that the Trump administration must implement the rule immediately,” Laura Meckler reports. “DeVos (said) the Education Department was still ‘reviewing the court’s decision and discussing our options.’ Published in the final days of the Obama administration, the rules were supposed to have taken effect in 2018. DeVos moved last summer to delay them for two years. … Under the regulation, states face tighter rules about how they tabulate data about the demographics and treatment of children in special education to ensure there are not racial disparities.”
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
-- On today’s opinion page, Helaine Olen makes an extended case that DeVos is “the worst member of Trump’s Cabinet.” Not because of the Special Olympics, Olen says, but because of her friendliness toward predatory lenders. The Education Department stalled Obama-era rules intended to make it easier for people who racked up tens of thousands of dollars in student loans attending for-profit colleges that lured them in with phony come-ons and job placement statistics to receive relief, and backed down only when a court stepped in last year, Olen explains: “Now DeVos’s department is moving slower than a tortoise. According to reporting by CNN, the Department of Education did not review any requests for loan dismissal under ‘borrower defense’ provisions between June and September of last year, and is refusing to answer questions about how many it has signed off on since. … “DeVos is also supporting eliminating the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program, which permits borrowers who can show they worked for a nonprofit or the government — think teachers and librarians and firemen — for 10 years while making regular and on-time student loan payments to see the remainder of their balance forgiven. … There is something particularly distasteful about DeVos, whose wealth is inherited, essentially kicking sand in the faces of people who are trying to get ahead by doing what society tells them to do — get an education.”
“We’re diving into a wood chipper,” said longtime Republican strategist Mike Murphy. “I guess that’s the plan — being on the wrong side of issues, on top of the head winds we’re facing, with the House Freedom Caucus and Trump’s ego providing our political compass.”
Trump Makes Batshit Crazy Claim That Illegal Voters Change Into Disguises In Their Cars......... And That's Why Republicans Lose
With Social Program Fights, Some Republicans Fear Being Seen As The Party Of The 1 Percent
March 29 at 5:37 PM
President Trump boasted this week that the Republican Party will soon be known as “the party of great health care.”
But a growing number of Republicans fear that it risks being tagged as the party of the 1 percent instead — handing Democrats a potent political message as the GOP pushes to gut former president Barack Obama’s health-care law and other popular federal programs, including those that help the poor and people with disabilities.
A spate of policy moves in recent weeks by Republican lawmakers and Trump administration officials has driven the party’s agenda hard to the right, giving new fodder to Democratic presidential candidates eager to shift the national debate to such issues as health care and jobs ahead of the 2020 election.
The administration’s budget released this month, for example, includes massive rollbacks of programs including Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security Disability Insurance, as well as cuts to the Special Olympics, Meals on Wheels, and programs related to autism and other developmental disabilities.
Trump signaled his misgivings about some of those cuts in recent days — rescinding a proposal to zero out Special Olympics funding, which had sparked a bipartisan backlash, and promising to protect a cleanup program for the Great Lakes in states that could be crucial to his reelection.
Democrats said the broad efforts by Trump and Republicans to attack programs that aid lower-income and working-class Americans could help blunt the president’s populist appeal and provide voters with more reasons to consider supporting Democratic candidates. The debate bears echoes of Obama’s successful reelection effort in 2012, when Democrats attacked now-Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) as an out-of-touch GOP nominee beholden to the wealthiest Americans.
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Trump, accompanied by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), left, and Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), arrives Tuesday for a Senate Republican luncheon at the U.S. Capitol. (Jose Luis Magana/AP)
On Capitol Hill, “the reaction is: Make my day,” said Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-Ore). “Democrats swept the midterms based on health care, among other key issues. The president is helping us make our case.”
The policy blitz reflects the deeply conservative agenda at the core of Trump’s administration. It is led by many influential aides and appointees who are unflinching ideologues, even as Trump prefers to call himself a “nationalist” or a businessman with “common sense.”
Coupled with fallout from the 35-day government shutdown that ended in January and a GOP tax plan that delivered major benefits to the wealthy, Republicans once again find themselves on the defensive — fending off Democrats who say they’re not just the party of Trump but also of the rich and powerful.
And they face growing questions of empathy on issues including the crush of asylum-seeking families at the southern border and disaster aid to Puerto Rico in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria, which Trump complainedabout in a private lunch Tuesday with Senate Republicans.
“We’re diving into a wood chipper,” said Trump critic and longtime Republican strategist Mike Murphy. “I guess that’s the plan — being on the wrong side of issues, on top of the head winds we’re facing, with the House Freedom Caucus and Trump’s ego providing our political compass.”
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren, shown campaigning last weekend in Memphis, said Republicans were trying to deprive people of a “basic human right” by cutting health care. (Jim Weber/AP)
Trump’s move this week to focus on eliminating the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, also served to shift attention away from what the president and his allies viewed as vindication — the attorney general’s conclusion that a special counsel did not establish a criminal conspiracy between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia.
“He has a penchant for distracting from the news — good or bad, apparently,” House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) said. “This presidency is the most disorganized that I’ve seen — most self-destructive and most impulsive.”
Republicans’ difficult balancing act on health care and other social programs was epitomized by congressional testimony this week from Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, who forcefully defended her agency’s request to cut billions from the budget. Democrats attacked the plan as heartless and damaging to students who need the most help — particularly a proposal to eliminate $17.6 million in funding for the Special Olympics, which gives people with intellectual disabilities the chance to compete in athletics on a global stage.
Trump’s political team was initially combative on the issue. A spokesman for Trump’s reelection campaign, for example, suggested Thursday that abortion rights supporters cannot be “sincerely concerned” about the Special Olympics because they “see abortion as the cure for Down syndrome.”
But the national outcry about the fate of Special Olympics funding — including among Republicans such as Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) — eventually led Trump to back off DeVos’s hard line.
“The Special Olympics will be funded,” Trump told reporters Thursday. “I have overridden my people. We’re funding the Special Olympics.”
Similar Republican divisions flared on health care this week as Trump decided to effectively revive efforts to throttle Obama’s health-care law, which has survived nine years of GOP attempts to kill it even as it has expanded in scope and popularity.
Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, a former conservative firebrand in the House, championed a court filing from the Justice Department on Monday arguing that the law should be thrown out in its entirety — including provisions protecting millions of Americans with preexisting health conditions and allowing young adults to stay on their parents’ plans.
Congressional Republicans, already on edge after seeing Democrats use health care to help win back the House majority, were immediately lukewarm to the move. Although wary of clashing with Trump, many GOP lawmakers don’t see returning to the Affordable Care Act as a smart political play and would rather focus criticism on Medicare-for-all proposals from some leading Democrats.
“Dear GOP: When Democrats are setting themselves ablaze by advocating for the destruction of American health care, try to resist the temptation of asking them to pass the kerosene,” tweeted Josh Holmes, a Republican consultant and former chief of staff to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) privately urged Trump to hold off on trying to destroy Obama’s law through the courts, according to a White House official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk publicly. But the president ignored him and has since been telling Republican lawmakers to come up with a replacement plan.
“If the Supreme Court rules that Obamacare is out, we’ll have a plan that is far better than Obamacare,” Trump told reporters Wednesday.
McConnell, who would need to shepherd any health-care legislation through the Senate, has been muted in his response, telling Politico on Thursday that his priority on the issue is countering Democrats.
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders also showed no signs of backtracking, issuing a statement that railed against Democrats as promoters of a “socialist agenda” who “sold Obamacare on lies and empty promises.”
“The president, when he feels momentum, he leaps,” said Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.). “He feels some wind at his back, he feels some momentum, and he thinks, ‘Hey, let’s take this on.’ ”
But, he added with a laugh, “I’m not sure I’d advise it that way.”
Mulvaney has worked closely with acting White House budget director Russell T. Vought, a former congressional staffer with links to prominent conservative leaders. Vought is also at the center of other attempts to aggressively shrink federal social programs.
An aide to DeVos, for example, said the education secretary opposed Special Olympics cuts but was overruled by the Office of Management and Budget, which Vought runs. DeVos said in a statement Thursday that she welcomed Trump’s reversal and that she had fought behind the scenes to maintain the funding.
Vought also coordinated the rollout of Trump’s sweeping budget plan, which seeks significant spending cuts, including a 5 percent reduction across a range of programs dealing with foreign aid, environmental protection and transportation, among other initiatives.
Democrats, meanwhile, saw an opening this week to win new attention for their domestic policy agenda following the end of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s Russia probe — and to court voters who may be unsettled by the GOP. Pelosi rolled out legislation aimed at shoring up Obama’s health-care law and preserving the Paris climate accord.
Still, health care has been treacherous territory for both parties. It took eight years for Obama’s health-care law to transition from a political burden for Democrats to a potential political lifeboat. Numerous 2020 presidential candidates also want to go further than Pelosi toward achieving universal health-care coverage, including various Medicare-for-all proposals that Republicans see as ripe political targets.
But for now, Democrats in Congress and on the campaign trail are rallying against Trump and the Republicans on traditional — and preferential — battlegrounds such as health care, social programs and federal spending.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said Republicans were denying many Americans a “basic human right,” while South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg said the Trump administration wants to “take away your health coverage, with no sign of a plan to help you if they win and you lose.”
Laura Meckler, Damian Paletta and Felicia Sonmez contributed to this report.
Robert CostaRobert Costa is a national political reporter for The Washington Post. He covers the White House, Congress, and campaigns. He joined The Post in January 2014. He is also the moderator of PBS's "Washington Week" and a political analyst for NBC News and MSNBC. Follow
Dan Price, owner of Gravity Payments, center, visiting a customer with a member of his sales team in Seattle. Ruth Fremson/The New York Times
Nicholas Kristof: The company that pays everyone $70,000
Do you remember that four years ago a company in Seattle, Gravity Payments, announced that it was going to pay everybody a minimum salary of $70,000 a year? At the time, Rush Limbaugh predicted that the company would collapse, and Fox News called the owner a “lunatic.” I flew to Seattle to find out what had happened at the company — and discovered that employees were now able to buy homes, start families and live better lives, even as the company thrived. Here’s what I found.
One reason for my interest in Gravity is that American capitalism manifestly has some profound problems. One of the most striking examples is the way drug companies helped manufacture (or, more generously, amplify) a pain crisis that they offered the solution to, in the form of prescription opioids. Some 80 percent of people with opioid addictions in the U.S. started with prescription pain killers, and it’s difficult to distinguish ethically between some pharma CEOs and Colombian drug lords. New York State just this week filed a suit alleging that the Sackler family of Purdue Pharma moved assets around to protect them from opioid litigation; the family denies it. Now here’s my column on what happened when a company raised its minimum salary to $70,000 for even the humblest employee. There are some lessons here for other companies. Please read!
Remember the Guy Who Gave His Employees a $70K Minimum Wage? What Happened Next?
A Story about Sage, Part Four. Sage comes home and joins the group at the dinner table. We learn a little about what she is like and how she looks. Read on ......
Sage did what she wanted. She wasn’t born doing what she wanted. I believe that self-awareness came to her some time after she turned twenty and gave birth to her son Eric. She married Eric’s father and became dependent on him. Well, she didn’t like that and somehow, over a period of time or maybe all at once she burst out of her cage and strode forth a free woman, albeit one burdened with an infant son and no visible means of support. She left Eric’s father and resolved to ignore him. Stumbling her way along the freedom trail she managed to get pregnant again --- it can be that easy – and gave birth to another son, Sean, whose father basically never showed up at all. Two kids and no money. Move back in with her parents in San Jose? Why not just lie down in the freeway and get run over by a truck. I never heard her describe any saving angel who came along to steer her forward. She found her own way. Got on welfare and food stamps. Enrolled in San Jose Community College. She wasn’t really a feminist, she never read the manual, or followed the program or went to the meeting. She just did what she wanted. Not reckless or careless or selfish, but with a sense of responsibility --- she did pay her bills. But she had this joy in her that was her most telling attribute. She lived with joy and it filled the room. The house where she lived in Piedmont, this group of hippies and her two kids, the furniture and the polished wood floor, the kitchen that could have been cleaner, it was a place of quiet joy and affection and Sage did that. Sage was a hugger. I was one of many huggees. She went round the evening table hugging and touching and then sat down across from me and filled her plate. “That’s Fred,” someone said. “He’s staying on the couch.” Sage nodded and smiled. I felt a little awkward. We were not being presented to each other, unless we were and didn’t know it. John, the soft-spoken man from rural Iowa, began to speak. He sounded like me when he talked, but slower. He had an easy sound on his vowels. Maybe it was the mustache hanging over his upper lip that benefited his acoustics. One of the few mustaches I ever liked. On his head brown hair like a mop, but combed and clean. My height, somewhat slighter in figure. “I was in the Peace Corps for two years, in Afghanistan. Of course I didn’t know what to expect when I got there, except I was bursting with the best intentions to do right and save the people. Peace Corps training was minimal, they just wanted to see if you could tolerate a strange life in a faraway country and live in primitive circumstances. “I could do that, and I could introduce progressive farming practices like we had on some farms back in Iowa, with soil conservation and crop rotation. Afghanistan was a paradise when the apricot trees bloomed. All the people were friendly. I had a little house with a kerosene lamp. I had a shaded front porch with a comfortable rattan chair. That was enough. The Peace Corps just left me there and I loved it. “I would have loved it without the hashish, but it was better with the hashish. I had never smoked pot or anything until I got to Afghanistan and they offered me a toke on the pipe one evening. The hash brought me into a state of bliss, I guess you could say. And it was the end of all my Peace Corps intentions, the program part anyway. Basically I got my own pipe and my own stash and there went the next two years, stoned, sitting on the porch, greeting the neighbors as they paced by, and representing the best of America --- peacefully. No war, no bombs, no troops, no invasion, no napalm, just me on the porch leaning back on the rattan chair,” John said. “You made good use of your time, “ I said. “I have friends who mail me hashish from Afghanistan. If you like we can clean up the kitchen and then smoke a bowl in the living room,” John said. Sage agreed. She said, “I need to round up these children and get them started toward bedtime, so I’ll join you guys later.” Sage stood up from her plate at the table and for the first time I got a good look at her. The evening light was soft. The dining surface was sweetly strewn with brown rice crumbles and tamari soy sauce drips over bits of chopped celery. John started clearing plates. Sage stretched her arms wide as if to hug the world, but she was looking at me. She was looking at me and that flattered my ego, but I didn’t want to be a show off and make antics. And I didn’t want to rub my eyes with a closed fist like a small baby. “I like your house here, “ I said. “We like it too,” she said. No chit-chat. The moment felt important, except important wasn’t the right word. She had fine light brown silky hair, curly and down past her hears but not down to her shoulders. Combed easily. No makeup. Small earrings, pretty blue eyes under light-brown eye brows. She wasn’t a looker, but her face was expressive and unguarded. Smiles came easily, sorrow showed with blotchy red flushes on her cheeks, and tears jut as easy as her smile. It’s hard to describe what she looked like, and much easier to describe how I felt when I looked at her – and I felt good. She was my size, maybe an inch shorter, square in the shoulder, firm breasts, wide hips. Untucked flannel shirt and jeans, often barefoot. She looked at me too and made her own description in her memory bank. No, no. She didn’t have a memory bank like me. She didn’t hold on to the image and file it away under broad categories to be sorted and treasured like a collection of coins. She was no mental hoarder like me. But she looked at me and then turned away, saying “I’ve got to read my kids a story and sing them to sleep. I won’t be long.” So I went to the living room and sat on the couch. John was there and Nick, the astrologer, was there too. Listening to a Cat Stevens record and waiting for her to join us. “Did you say were a Cancer?” Nick said. Sage came in at this and said quickly, “Gemini. I’m Gemini.” “Gemini and quick as a flash, for you Sage,” Nick said. “But Cancer is deep water for you, Fred. Now let us pursue the dangerous course of making comparisons. Think Gemini. Feel Cancer…..Shall I continue?”
Please note the typo in your phrase "down past her hears."
Also note that a word is missing in "Did you say were a Cancer." (I'd also re-work the last paragraph which - as it stands - ends this "chapter" on a weak note.)
I just uploaded the following post whose subject matter has predisposed me to think how Americans are acculturated to assume that lots of people should be poor because they're n'er-do-well failures. This same orthodoxy holds that the piggish rich deserve everything they've got - even crooks like Mafia Don.
And so Sage -- a hard-working, loving Mom (arguably the world's most important occupation) -- should have had adequate wherewithal simply by virtue of "society's structure" rather than defaulting to strip joint dancing.
The nearly ubiquitous American belief that "Life is a Lottery" and that we're all "waiting for our number to come up" to spare us from penury, is just suckhole barbarism and ideological bottom-feeding.
Trump as dopamine for dimwits.
But here is how it could work -- except for the real haters who NEED "the undeserving poor" just like some people need a dog to kick -- and they need to have humans-reduced-to-doghood more than they need civilization itself. Shame on us. https://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/.../nicholas-kristof...
High-profile police killings caught on video often point to a probable legal outcome. But the outrage they engender is outpaced by a justice system that critics say favors police.
No one ever accused Trumpistas of being the brightest bulbs in the closet.
Sure, they are smart enough to wreak havoc -- and sophomoric enough to think they're "saving" America.
But their real "genius" is destruction, not creation.
And so these deconstructionists are opposed cultural phenomena (like NPR and The National Endowment For The Arts) whose essence is uplifting rather than trashing.
Their motto is: "We are all in this... alone."
Dear F,
Eventually empires collapse under their own dead weight.
Who knows?
Demise of The American Empire could be the best thing that has happened to the planet since Uncle Sam began his 1.) continental... 2.) hemispheric... and 3.) global... swashbuckling.
1.) Native American genocide
2.) The Monroe Doctrine
3.) Dropping the Atomic Bomb twice - both times on deliberately chosen large civilian populations.
However, since empires do not surrender easily, the "only" question is whether Trump will orchestrate (whether consciously or unconsciously) a nuclear war - either out of hostility, or, to cover up his failure as a person, a president and a businessman.
In the context of your recent email, why all the kerfuffle about Biden when there is trivial kerfuffle about this?
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.
"In Her 1990 Divorce Deposition, Ivana Trump Accused Donald Of Raping Her"
(American "conservatives" admire the fact that Trump is rich enough to buy whatever "reality" he wants. They admire his self-deception because it confirms their own.)
...and we still have to consider and be concerned about Biden being to affectionate that it made one Bernie, Beto woman ,Lucy Flores ,uncomfortable in 2014..
Not abusive but inappropriate and admittedly a political claim.
This nutsism (my new word)is going to bury us. We don't need any more eggshells to walk on. Dems giving fodder to hector is unconscionable.
With astonishing frequency, American conservatives are not happy unless they’re being cruel. It is to liberalism’s credit that we give the barbarians too much credit. They give none, not even to their own humanity which is eagerly sacrificed to prove that human beings are incorrigible fallen creatures who need to be stomped on and stomped down. Make no mistake. Legions of neo-Nazis — almost always white Christians (and often daily church-goers) are “inside the gates.” https://www.rawstory.com/2019/03/conservative-writer-suffered-white-hot-meltdown-embarrassing-story-marriage-spread-online/ Sent from my iPhone
Clik here to view.