Quantcast
Channel: Pax on both houses
Viewing all 30150 articles
Browse latest View live

Right-Leaning Marine Vet Explains Why He Hates Trump: "Let Me Count The Ways" (A Quora Response)

$
0
0
Image result for pax on both houses trump lies
"Trump Is A Bald-Faced Liar: There Is No Other Word For It"

Pulitzer Prize Winner David Cay Johnston
"Trump Is Not A Loyal American... There Is A Traitor In The White House"

Why are people so hostile towards President Donald Trump? A question asked on Quora...and here is the best response I've seen or heard so far....

Thank you to Chris O'Leary...Please take the time to read (a little long I know, but worth it.)


Chris O'Leary, former 10 years of Active Duty at U.S. Marine Corps (1989-2000)

I’ll take a stab at this. Before you pass my answer off as “Another Liberal Snowflake” consider that 1.) I’m a right-leaning centrist who has voted Republican way more often than Democrat, and 2.) if you want to call someone who spent the entire decade of his 20’s serving in the Marine Corps a snowflake, I’d be ready to answer the question what did you do with your 20’s?


Why Liberals (and not-so liberals) are against President Trump.


A.) He lies. A LOT. Politifact rates 69% of the words he speaks as “Mostly False or worse” Only 17% of the things he says get a “Mostly True” or better rating. That is an absolutely unbelievable number. How he doesn’t speak more truth by mistake is beyond me. To put it in context, Obama’s rating was 26% mostly false or worse, and I had a problem with that. Many of Trump’s former business associates report that he has always been a compulsive liar, but now he’s the President of the United States, and that’s a problem. And this is a man who expects you to believe him when he points at other people and says “They’re lying”. (Check Politifact for detailed info.)

B.) He’s an authoritarian populist, not a conservative. He advances regressive social policy while proposing to expand federal spending and federalist authority over states, both of which conservatives are supposed to hate.


C.) He pretends at Christianity to court the Religious Right but fails to live anything resembling a Christ-Like Life.


D.) His nationalist “America First” message effectively alienates us and removes us from our place as leaders in the international community.


E.) His ideas on “Keeping us safe” are all thinly veiled ideas to remove our freedoms, he is, after all, an authoritarian first. They also are simply bad ideas.


F.) He couldn’t pass a 3rd-grade civics exam. He doesn't’ know what he’s doing. He doesn't understand how international relations work, he doesn’t understand how federal state or local governments work, and every time someone tries to “Run it like a business” it’s a spectacular failure. See Colorado Springs’ recent history as an example. And that was a businessman with a MUCH better business track record than Trump. We are talking about a man who lost money owning a freaking gambling casino.


G.) He’s unethical and always has been. As a businessman, he constantly left in his wake unpaid contractors and invoices, litigation, broken promises, whatever he could get away with.


H.) He is damaging our relationships with our best international friends while kissing up to nations that do not have our best interests in mind. To his question “Wouldn't’ it be great to have better relations with Russia?” The answer is Yes. But RUSSIA has to be the ones who earn that, who must stop doing the things that are damaging to that relationship, or we are simply weaker for it.


I.) He has never seen a shortcut he didn't like, and you can’t take shortcuts in government. “Nuclear Option, Remove the Filibuster, I’ll change the Constitution by Executive Order…Don…what happens when you remove the filibuster and the other side retakes the majority in the Senate? Suddenly want that filibuster back? What happens if you manage to change the Constitution by Executive Order and an Anti-2A President wins the next election?


J.) He is and always has been an unabashed racist. Yes, I’ve seen your favorite meme that claims he was never accused of racism before the Democrats…Absolutely false. See the Central Park 5, the lawsuits and fines resulting from his refusal to lease to black tenants, the 1992 lost appeal trying to overturn penalties for removing black dealers from tables, his remarks to the house native American affairs subcommittee in 1993. The man sees and treats racial groups of people as monoliths.


K.) He is systematically steamrolling regulations specifically designed to keep a disaster like the 2007 subprime mortgage crisis from happening again.


L.) He speaks and acts like a demagogue. He sees the Legislative and Judicial branches of government as inconveniences, blows up at criticism no matter how deserved and actively tries to countermand constitutional processes, not to mention attempts to blackmail and coerce people who are saying negative things about him.


M.) His choices for top positions, with the exception of Gen. Mattis, who is a gem, have been horrendous. A secretary of Education without a resume that would get her hired as a small town grammar school principal, A secretary of Energy who didn't know the Department of Energy was responsible for nuclear reserves, an EPA head whose biggest accomplishments to date had been suing the EPA on multiple occasions, an FCC head who while working for Verizon actively lobbied to kill net neutrality, and an Attorney General who thinks pot is “nearly as bad as heroin” and asked Congress for permission to go after legal pot businesses in states where it is legal. (There goes that great Republican States rights rally cry again, right? *Crickets*) An Interim AG after Firing his First AG who’s appointment is probably unconstitutional.


N.) He denies scientific fact. Ever notice that the only people you hear denying climate change are politicians and lobbyists? 99% of actual scientists studying the issue agree that it’s real, man-made and caused by greenhouse gasses. Ever notice that every big disaster movie starts with a bunch of politicians in a room ignoring a scientist's warning?


O.) He does not have the temperament to lead this nation. He is Thin Skinned, childish, and a bully, never mind misogynistic, boorish, rude, and incapable of civil discourse.


P.) He still does not understand that the words he speaks, or tweets, are the official position of 1/3 of the US government, and so does not govern his words. He still thinks when he speaks it’s good ol’ Donald Trump. It’s not. It’s the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. You have probably spread a meme or two around talking about how no president’s every word has ever been dissected before…YES, THEY ALWAYS HAVE. It’s just that every other president in our lifetime has understood the importance of his words and took great care to govern his speech. Trump blurts out whatever comes to his mind then complains when people talk about what a dumb thing that was to say.


Q.) He’s unqualified. If you owned a small business and were looking for someone to manage it, and an unnamed resume came across your desk and you saw 6 bankruptcies, showing a man who had failed to make money running CASINOS, would you hire him? He is a very poor businessman. This is a man it has been estimated would have been worth $10 BILLION more if he’d just taken what his father had given him, invested it in Index Funds and left it alone.


R.) He is President. But he refuses to take a leadership position and understand that he is everyone’s President. Conservatives complain about liberals chanting “Not my President” while Trump himself behaves as if no one but his supporters matter.


S.) He’s a blatant hypocrite. He spent 8 years bitching Obama out for his family trips, or golfing, or any time he took for himself, and what does he do? He was already on his 20th golf outing in APRIL of his 1st year in office. He constantly rants about respect for the military, yet can’t be bothered to attend the 100th anniversary of Armistice Day because of a little rain. (And that excuse about Marine One not being able to fly in the rain is HILARIOUS.)

I could go on, but I’m risking Carpal Tunnel, and I’m not sure how much longer I’ll have health insurance.


Edit:
Ok, Ok. Based on the most common feedback in the comments (Including the offer of a Marriage Proposal - - my wife was not amused) I’ll see what I can do about T-Z


T.) He’s a misogynist. It's not really ok in this day and age to be a misogynist, but it’s not a huge deal if you’re a private citizen. It’s a pretty big deal if you hate half the people you’re elected to lead. The disdain for women seeps out of his …whatever…. and he just can’t hide it.


U.) Face it. In any other election “Grab Em’ By the Pussy” would have been the end of that candidate’s chances. Back in the 90’s I used to marvel about how Teflon Bill Clinton was. I no longer do. The fact that he managed to slip by on that is as much a statement about how much people hate Hillary Clinton as it is about what is wrong with politics in this country right now.


V.) He has one response to a differing opinion. Attack. A good leader listens to criticism, to different points of view, is capable of self-reflection, tries to guide people to his point of view, and when necessary stands his ground and defends his convictions. Any of that sound like Trump? His default is not to Lead, its’ to attack. Scorched Earth. The Jim Acosta reaction is a good example. There was no defense of his convictions when Acosta was asking him repeated questions about his rhetoric on the caravan. His response was to attack Acosta.


W.) He takes credit for everything positive while deflecting blame for everything negative. Look at him with the Stock Market. He’s been bragging about it since day one, and to give credit where credit is due, speculation on coming deregulation early in his presidency did fuel some rapid growth, but to pretend that it’s all him, that we’re not in the 9th year of the longest bull market in history and THEN, when the standard market volatility that deregulation inevitably brings about starts to show up? Yeah. Look at yesterday. Hey! Stock Markets losing because the Democrats won! Do I need to bring out the Stock market chart for the last 10 Years again?

X.) He emboldens the worst among us. Counter-protesters are slammed into by a car while countering actual Nazi rally, and the response is there’s fault on “Both Sides” The media is at fault for a nut job sending them and Donald’s favorite targets pipe bombs. The truth is not all Republicans, not all Trump Supporters are racist, fascist lunatics. Many are just taken in by the bombastic personality and are living in an information bubble made worse by the fact that they unfollow anyone and ignore any source of information that makes them feel uncomfortable. People on the left do that too. The Biggest problem the right has right now is that the worst of the Right is the loudest and the most in your face, and the actual right, especially the Freaking PRESIDENT needs to be standing up and saying No. Those are not our values.


Y.) He seems to think the Constitution of The United States, the document that IS who we are, the document he took an oath to support and defend is some sort of inconvenience. He demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of Constitution, from believing he can alter the 14th through executive order, to Thinking The practice clause in the first amendment somehow supersedes the establishment clause (not that he really understands either) or that the practice clause only applies to Christians. Or his attacks on freedom of expression and the press. He repeatedly makes it clear that if he’s read them, he does not understand Articles 1–3, and that’s something he really should have before he took the job, because they’re not going away.


Z.) I’ll use Z for something I do blame him for, but the rest of us have to carry the blame too. Polarization. This country is more politically polarized than I can remember in my lifetime. Some of you who are a few years older than I may remember how it was in the late 60’s when construction workers in New York were being applauded for beating up hippies, I think it’s pretty close to that right now, but that was before my time. And he is the cause of much of the current level polarization, but also the result. It didn't’ start with Trump. We’ve been going down this road I think since the eruption of the Tea Party in the early years of the Obama Administration. I do hope the tide turns before it gets much worse because the thing that scares me more than anything is what if that keeps going the way it has been?”



Image result for pax on both houses trump full of shit



Warren Buffett: "A Rich Family" Takes Care Of Its Own And The United States Should Too"

$
0
0
Image result for warren buffett wealth inequality quotations
Warren Buffett On Wealth Inequality: "A Rich Family" Takes Care Of Its Own And The United States Should Too"

Related image

VIDEO: Pulitzer Prize Winner Reveals Evidence Of Trump's Extensive Mafia Ties


David Cay Johnston: "Trump Is Not A Loyal American... There Is A Traitor In The White House"
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2018/07/david-cay-johnston-trump-is-not-loyal.html 

"Trump's Blinding Blizzard Of Bullshit": A Compendium Of Best "Pax" Posts


Ex-Trumpista Ann Coulter Lambastes Trump's "Joke Presidency Scam" - "No Legacy Whatsoever"
https://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2018/12/ex-trumpista-ann-coulter-decries-trumps.html



Donald Trump Is An Asshole

David Brooks: "Medicare For All": The Impossible Dream

$
0
0

Image result for medicare for all

Alan: David Brooks concludes his article titled "Medicare For All" by saying the implementation of Medicare for All would "require" the undoing of The American Revolution.

I say such undoing is likely to be a good thing.

Indeed, if the nascent United States had not poisoned its national wellspring with unnecessary bloodshed against the British, but instead had exhibited Canadian restraint by never invoking violence, we would have evolved into a civilized country rather than "re-incorporating" as The United States of Barbaria under Donald J. Trump, a political - and personal - monstrosity of epic proportion. 

Furthermore, as witnessed in Trump's "revolution," 40% of Americans are fully prepared to trash American democracy, substituting our system of governance with political forms that are markedly more absolutist and heavy-handed, if not totalitarian. 

Indeed it is the diehard intent of Trump's "revolution" to trash Truth itself. http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2015/12/donald-trump-and-denise-de-rougemont.html

In recent years, Brooks has moved to the left if only because his authentic conservative instincts are understandably outraged by the moral and ideological bankruptcy of the Republican Party which David recently compared to Caligula's Rome.

Ever since Reagan's "Me Generation," the GOP has epitomized -- or perhaps I should say "brought to light" -- the bedrock truthfulness of John Kenneth Galbraith's observation:

Image result for "pax on both houses," galbraith
Notably, Galbraith (a JFK advisor) was born and raised Canadian.

Pax On Both Houses: Blog Posts About Canada

‘Medicare for All’: The Impossible Dream

There’s no plausible route from here to there.
David Brooks
Opinion Columnist
The Brits and Canadians I know certainly love their single-payer health care systems. If one of their politicians suggested they should switch to the American health care model, they’d throw him out the window.





  1. Founder Of Canada's Single Payer Healthcare System Is "The Greatest Canadian Ever"

  2. Canadian Letter To The Editor: "You Americans Have No Idea How Good Obama Is"

  3. Pax on both houses Canada's Fiscal Success 

  4. Pax on both houses: Canada - America's Reminder That Civilization Is Possible

So single-payer health care, or in our case “Medicare for all,” is worth taking seriously. I’ve just never understood how we get from here to there, how we transition from our current system to the one Bernie Sanders has proposed and Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris and others have endorsed.
Despite differences between individual proposals, the broad outlines of Medicare for all are easy to grasp. We’d take the money we’re spending on private health insurance and private health care, and we’d shift it over to the federal government through higher taxes in some form.
Then, since health care would be a public monopoly, the government could set prices and force health care providers to accept current Medicare payment rates. Medicare reimburses hospitals at 87 percent of costs while private insurance reimburses at 145 percent of costs. (Alan: WTF!?!?!)

Charles Blahous, a former Social Security and Medicare public trustee, estimates that under the Sanders plan, the government could pay about 40 percent less than what private insurers now pay for treatments.
If this version of Medicare for all worked as planned, everybody would be insured, health care usage would rise sharply because it would be free, without even a co-payment, and America would spend less over all on health care.
It sounds good. But the trick is in the transition.
First, patients would have to transition. Right now, roughly 181 million Americans receive health insurance through employers. About 70 percent of these people say they are happy with their coverage. Proponents of Medicare for all are saying: We’re going to take away the insurance you have and are happy with, and we’re going to replace it with a new system you haven’t experienced yet because, trust us, we’re the federal government! 

Alan: Brooks fails to ask how many Americans have no insurance at all and how many Americans have shitty insurance but won't realize their coverage is crap until they experience a signficant medical crisis. 

And what about the 30% of insured Americans who are already unhappy with their private insurance? Not a peep from Brooks - just the assurance that Canadians and Brits are happy with single payer but we Americans can't possibly make it work.

Like many other American conservatives, Brooks does not ask important questions because a central feature of conservative ideation is that many people are, at bottom, n'er-do-wells who don't deserve insurance. (Brooks may not harbor this view but his lifelong conservatism has saturated him with the disposition that some people deserve care and others do not.)

"The undeserving poor" - as George Bernard Shaw described "the unwashed masses" in his play "Pygmalion," the progenitor of "My Fair Lady."

If "the undeserving poor" only get shitty insurance, then shit is what they deserve. 

Of course, the suppositions that underly this complex of attitudes-and-beliefs is as "valid" as Hitler's belief that dirty, traitorous, theiving Jews deserved to die. 

It is high time that Americans scrutinized the underpinnings of all their belief system - religious and political. 

Just because people can "justify" monstrosity does not mean they themselves are not monsters.

Given that several dozen other "developed nations" -- each of them with wildly divergent histories -- have found ways to enact the equivalent of "Medicare for all" -- reveals Brooks despair as consistent with the values of a true conservative which is to say someone whose economic selfishness impels him to cowardly ideology and justification of uncharitable acts that cause people -- chiefly "the undeserving poor" -- to die unnecessarily, and to experience needless pain en route to their early graves. 

Warren Buffett: "A Rich Family" Takes Care Of Its Own And The United States Should Too"


(Brooks resumes...)

The insurance companies would have to transition. Lots of people work for and serve this industry. All-inclusive public health care would destroy this industry beyond recognition, and those people would have to find other work.
Hospitals would have to transition. In many small cities the local health care system is the biggest employer. As Reihan Salam points out in The Atlantic, the United States has far more fully stocked hospitals relative to its population and much lower bed occupancy than comparable European nations have.
If you live in a place where the health system is a big employer, think what happens when that sector takes a sudden, huge pay cut. The ripple effects would be immediate — like a small deindustrialization.


Doctors would have to transition. Salary losses would differ by specialty, but imagine you came out of med school saddled with debt and learn that your payments are going to be down by, say 30 percent. Similar shocks would ripple to other health care workers. (Alan: Notably, Brooks makes no comment about other societies which have long been structured to accommodatre lower physician salaries.)
The American people would have to transition. Americans are more decentralized, diverse and individualistic than people in the nations with single-payer systems. They are more suspicious of centralized government and tend to dislike higher taxes. (Alan: Brooks makes no comment about the toxicity of "rugged indivividualism" and "cowboy capitalism" and does not question whether these characteristics are public health "pathogens" which a healthy society would seek to mitigate if not eradicate.)
The Sanders plan would increase federal spending by about $32.6 trillion over its first 10 years, according to a Mercatus Center study that Blahous led. Compare that with the Congressional Budget Office’s projection for the entire 2019 fiscal year budget, $4.4 trillion. That kind of sticker shock is why a plan for single-payer in Vermont collapsed in 2014 and why Colorado voters overwhelmingly rejected one in 2016. It’s why legislators in California killed one. In this plan, the taxes are upfront, the purported savings are down the line. (Alan: Several dozen countries make "single payer" work and the citizens of those countries are considerably happier with their healthcare than Americans are.)
Once they learn that Medicare for all would eliminate private insurance and raise taxes, only 37 percent of Americans support it, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation survey. In 2010, Republicans scored an enormous electoral victory because voters feared that the government was taking over their health care, even though Obamacare really didn’t. Now, under Medicare for all, it really would. This seems like an excellent way to re-elect Donald Trump. (Alan: Are Americans too dimwitted to realize that single payer is preferred by societies that have actually enacted it? Yes, I know... They are...)
The government would also have to transition. Medicare for all works only if politicians ruthlessly enforce those spending cuts. But in our system of government, members of Congress are terrible at fiscal discipline. They are quick to cater to special interest groups, terrible at saying no. To make single-payer really work, we’d probably have to scrap the U.S. Congress and move to a more centralized parliamentary system. (Alan: Perhaps Brooks is making a case that the United States "deserves" to fail in its efforts to become a livable, genorous, caring society. I wonder how "all this" looks through the eyes of "God" as Judeo-Christianity has traditionally conceived God.)
Finally, patient expectations would have to transition. Today, getting a doctor’s appointment is annoying but not onerous. In Canada, the median wait time between seeing a general practitioner and a specialist is 8.7 weeks; between a G.P. referral and an orthopedic surgeon, it’s nine months. That would take some adjusting.
If America were a blank slate, Medicare for all would be a plausible policy, but we are not a blank slate. At this point, the easiest way to get to a single-payer system would probably be to go back to 1776 and undo that whole American Revolution thing.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on FacebookTwitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.


































David Brooks has been a columnist with The Times since 2003. He is the author of “The Road to Character” and the forthcoming book, “The Second Mountain.”

Warren Buffett: "A Rich Family" Takes Care Of Its Own And The United States Should Too"

Congressional Testimony Makes Clear That Trump's Tax Plan Incentivizes American Companies To Move Offshore

Tucker Carlson Praises White Men For "Creating Civilization And Stuff"

$
0
0
Image result for tucker carlson quotes
"So many attacks???"
Name 3.

Americans Are 9 Times More Likely To Be Killed By A Policeman Than A Terrorist

American Cops Fire More Bullets At One NYC Man Than All German Cops Fire In A Year
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/09/85-shots-us-cops-use-more-ammo-per-man.html

1 Small Town's Cops Have Killed More People Than Combined Police Of Germany And U.K.
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2015/02/1-small-towns-cops-have-killed-more.html


In 2008, Carlson lamented that “everyone’s embarrassed to be a white man," before stating that white men deserve credit for “creating civilization and stuff.” The audio was compiled by Media Matters for America.By Michael Brice-Saddler and Eli Rosenberg  •  Read more »

There's Never Been A Safer Time For Cops Nor A More Dangerous Time For Criminals

http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/11/theres-never-been-safer-time-to-be-cop.html

What Second Amendment Evangelists Fail To Understand About Their Opposition

"Gun Cartoons and Gun Violence Bibliography"

"The Brink," New Steve Bannon Documentary: "I'm About One Thing - Winning"

$
0
0

Plowshares And The Kings Bay Naval Submarine Base: 25 Years For Trying To Save The Planet

$
0
0

Image result for plowshares, pax on both houses

Hi Friends -- While 25 years is the maximum sentence. We will not receive that much time. Keep us in your prayers. Peace, Patrick

25 Years in Jail for Protecting the Planet?

The Kings Bay 7 were trying to put an end to the threat of nuclear war. Now they face a quarter-century behind bars.

By Frida Berrigan

February 18, 2019

Kings Bay Plowshares Activist Patrick O'Neill's Testimony Re: Destruction Of Nuclear Sub Base



Twenty-five years in prison.

That is the possible fate of seven Catholic anti-nuclear activists awaiting trial for their action on April 4, 2018, at the Kings Bay Naval Submarine Base in St. Mary’s, Georgia—the largest base of its kind in the world.
The Kings Bay 7 chose to act on the 50th anniversary of the assassination of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., in order to lift up King’s analysis of the “triple evils of militarism, racism and materialism.” There are six Trident submarines based at Kings Bay, Each submarine can carry 24 submarine-launched ballistic missiles  designated Trident II D-5. Each of those missiles can carry up to eight 100-kiloton nuclear warheads (about 30 times the explosive force of the Hiroshima bomb). Plowshares activist Patrick O’Neill, one of the co-defendants, called Trident “the most insidious and evil weapon of mass destruction ever constructed.” 

Carrying hammers and baby bottles filled with their own blood, the seven attempted to transform weapons of mass destruction using the ancient metaphors of “swords into plowshares” and “spears into pruning hooks” from Hebrew Scriptures. With their action, they hoped to call attention to the ways in which nuclear weapons kill every day, by their mere existence and maintenance. They are charged with three federal felonies and one misdemeanor for their actions.

It bears repeating: They could face 25 years in prison if convicted on all counts.

On Sunday, nearly 200 people came to Fordham University’s Lincoln Center campus to hear from the four of the Kings Bay 7 who are out on bond. Clare Grady, Martha Hennessey, Patrick O’Neill, and Carmen Trotta were all able to participate in the event. Father Steve Kelly, Mark Colville, and Elizabeth McAlister (my mother) remain jailed in Brunswick, Georgia.

The event began with a 15-minute excerpt of The Nuns, The Priests and the Bombs. The film focuses on two Plowshares actions—one at a naval base near Seattle in 2009 and another at the Y-12 nuclear facility in Tennessee in 2012—and the role of the Catholic conscience in spurring the activists to this radical form of action.

Helen Young, one of the filmmakers, was present at the event. She hopes her film encourages the public to pay closer attention. “Sadly,” nuclear weapons have “become the purview of security experts and activists, while the public has remained largely disengaged,” she said, “or not engaged on a level commensurate with the existential threat we face. I believe we all owe a debt of gratitude to the activists featured in this film who have put their lives on the line in an effort to wake us all up and pull us back from the nuclear brink.”

The 2012 action at Y-12 drew widespread media attention and triggered congressional hearings because it highlighted lapses in nuclear-weapons-complex security. As William D. Hartung, the director of the Arms and Security Project at the Center for International Policy noted on Sunday, “The mainstream media coverage and the reaction in Congress were more about how to protect the weapons from protesters than to protect us from the weapons. This rhetoric about safety and security of the weapons complex, and protecting ‘special materials’—a euphemism for ingredients for bombs that can end life as we know it—distracts from the real issue: These are weapons of mass slaughter that must be eliminated before they eliminate us.”

The Kings Bay Plowshares action has not garnered the same kind of front-page, bold-type treatment from the mainstream media, and the event on Sunday was the first time the defendants have been able to appear together and speak publicly about their action.

Carmen Trotta, a longtime member of the New York Catholic Worker, shared that he had never committed a felony before. “I could notnot do it,” because they “were all dear friends” and he felt compelled to act. The April 4, 2018, action was the most recent of more than 80 nonviolent Plowshares disarmament actions that have been carried out since 1980. Trotta said that with each action the message is the same: “Nuclear weapons are necessarily evil.” That “message is not what the courts want to hear. But that is the message that we keep bringing.”
Patrick O’Neill, a Catholic Worker and father of eight from Garner, North Carolina, told the audience, “At present, we seven are in a lengthy pretrial holding pattern as we await the government’s response to our various motions that argue our actions were a legal response to US deployment of weapons of mass destruction that stand at the ready to bring to an end the human experiment. We and our great team of lawyers are arguing our case on the basis of US law, international law, necessity and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, to name a few.” 

Martha Hennessey splits her time between her family’s farm in Vermont and the New York Catholic Worker, which was founded by her grandmother Dorothy Day. She shared that she was motivated to participate in the action by her time in Iran and Korea and spending time with the people labeled the “enemy” by the United States. After prayer and discernment, “I came to a place of having to personally look at my life, my privilege and where I stand in the world” and take “responsibility for this situation.” The action was “incredible” and the “greatest test of my faith,” she said. 

Clare Grady, a mother of two and Catholic Worker activist from Ithaca, New York, participated in the Griffiss Plowshares in 1983 (Elizabeth McAlister was also a member of that action) and talked about the difference between those two actions 35 years apart. Her motivation this time around was “not just the fear of if these weapons are launched,” but also her growing awareness that nuclear weapons “kill every day in the mining and testing on Native lands.” She continued that “We have awakened to the need to attend to something we have neglected,” namely, the intersections of militarism, racism, and materialism. 

As the four activists spoke, the larger context of their action came into sharp focus. There is an international, grassroots movement toabolish nuclear weapons, and a landmark global agreement to ban nuclear weapons, known officially as the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, was adopted in July 2017. But none of the nine nuclear states participated in the negotiations.

Nuclear-weapons spending in the United States continues to rise, and President Donald Trump’s threatening bombast and willful ignorance puts a new, sharper edge on the sword of Damocles President John F. Kennedy warned against so long ago. And, as many of those gathered remarked, anti-nuclear demonstrations are not drawing the million people who crowded Central Park in 1982.

Bill Moyers, celebrated journalist and conscientious newsman, was at the Fordham event and remarked that as the United States is withdrawing from international arms-control treaties and moving us all closer to nuclear midnight, Plowshares actions are an “essential reminder that there is an alternative—a radical alternative—for the protection of the planet.”

The defendants, their legal team, their wide circle of supporters, their families (together, the defendants have 20 children and 16 grandchildren), all hope they can accomplish these critical aims without spending the next 25 years in prison. 

Frida Berrigan, a TomDispatch regular, writes the Little Insurrections blog for WagingNonviolence.org, is the author of It Runs In The Family: On Being Raised By Radicals and Growing Into Rebellious Motherhood, and lives in New London, Connecticut.


The Endgame Of White Supremacy Is Always Death: A Catholic Considers Christchurch

$
0
0
Image result for brenton tarrant

The Endgame Of White Supremacy Is Always Death:  A Catholic Considers "The Near Occasion Of Sin"
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/03/new-zealand-shooting-white-supremacy.html

How Alleged New Zealand Mosque Shooter Went From World Traveler To Hatemonger
The New York Post
https://nypost.com/2019/03/15/how-alleged-new-zealand-mosque-shooter-went-from-world-traveler-to-hatemonger/
"The Massacre In New Zealand, White Nationalism, And The Christian Response"
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/henrykarlson/2019/03/the-massacre-in-new-zealand-white-nationalism-and-the-christian-response/

New Zealand Mosque Attacks And The Scourge Of White Supremacy
Al Jazeera
https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/zealand-mosque-attacks-scourge-white-supremacy-190315090752857.html

New Zealand Mosque Assassin Praised Trump In His Writings
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/03/zealand-mosques-attack-suspect-praised-trump-manifesto-190315100143150.html




"Rare In New Zealand": My Reply To Fred Owens' Post About The Christchurch Mosque Carnage

$
0
0
Image result for brenton tarrant
Alan Archibald “Rare in New Zealand”... but to a significant extent “Made in America” where mass murder is our daily bread.
https://m.dailykos.com/.../-New-Zealand-shooter-called...


New Zealand shooter called Donald Trump 'a symbol of white identity' as he murdered 49 people
DAILYKOS.COM
New Zealand shooter called Donald Trump 'a symbol of white identity' as he…

Alan Archibald I invite conservative readers to weigh in. Really want to hear what you have to say.
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/.../reprise-must-see...

Reprise: "Must-See" Video Mashup Of Trump's Racism
PAXONBOTHHOUSES.BLOGSPOT.COM
Reprise: "Must-See" Video Mashup Of Trump's Racism

Fred Owens: "We Live In A Good Country"

$
0
0
We live in a good country. I love almost everybody in it.
  • Alan Archibald America's widely-held belief in its own goodness is largely a function of having "cornered" global markets for over a hundred years. The resulting surfeit of wealth enabled us to undertake a tremendous amount of philanthropy which resulted in widespreaSee More



    • Fred Owens alan, you make this too complicated

    • Alan Archibald It IS complicated. Or, we could cut through the elaborate matrix of interactive facts and say that "white privilege sucks and has always sucked." Like it or not, America is surrendering the torch to dark-skinned peoples... and Trump with his prostrate See More

    • JGB: Buckle up!

    • Alan Archibald I agree with Kennedy. We have become “The United States Of Barbaria.”
      Image may contain: 1 person, text

NY Judge Denies Request To Allow Unvaccinated Waldorf School Students To Return To School

Robert Reich: Warren Is Correct About Breaking Up Big Tech

"The Love Of Money Is The Root Of All Evil," Patheos

Discussion With Frog Hospital's Fred Owens About Elite Schools And The Quality Of Leadership

$
0
0
Image result for leona helmsley quotes
An elite school is a place where a very large amount of academic resources are focused on a very small number of students. Is that a valid description?
Comments



The Conspiratorial Mindset: A Comment On My Post, "Colorado Gun Sales Spike After Batman Slaughter"

$
0
0

The following comment by Blood Eagle 88 was attached to my blog post, "Colorado Gun Sales Spike After Batman Slaughter"
  1. Mass shootings are all hoaxes put on by crisis actors and there is more then enough evidence to prove it.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Compendium Of Best Pax Posts About Conspiracies And Conspiracism

  3. Image result for pax on both houses carl sagan
  4. Alan: At bottom, conspiracists need conspiracy theories -- no matter how unhinged those theories are -- to bolster "identities, value systems and world views" which Reality has begun to threaten at the level of bedrock premises.
  5. Image result for pax on both houses carl sagan


White Nationalism's Deep American Roots: An Excavation Of The Book Hitler Called His "Bible"

Big League Banker Jamie Dimon Says "We've Split The Economy, Leaving The Poor Behind"

$
0
0
Image result for jamie dimon quotes
Big League Banker Jamie Diamond Says "We've Split The Economy, Leaving The Poor Behind"

Image result for laura ingraham quotes
Duh.
Warren Buffett: "A Rich Family Takes Care Of Its Own And The United States Should Too"
https://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2019/03/warren-buffett-on-wealth-inequality.html

Image result for "The Pitchforks Are Coming For Us Billionaires"

Nick Hanauer: "The Pitchforks Are Coming For Us Billionaires"

Image result for "The Pitchforks Are Coming For Us Billionaires"
... and Trumpista lickspittles are too dimwitted to know they've been had.

Image result for "The Pitchforks Are Coming For Us Billionaires"



False Flag "Expert" Analyzes Christchurch Attack

$
0
0
Image result for pax on both houses carl sagan
False Flag "Expert" Analyzes Christchurch Attack 
(His Bill Of Particulars Exhibits The Intellectual Rigor Of A Washington Swamp Slug)

Compendium Of Best Pax Posts About Conspiracies And Conspiracism
  1. Alan: At bottom, conspiracists need conspiracy theories -- no matter how unhinged those theories are -- to bolster "identities, value systems and world views" which Reality has begun to threaten at the level of bedrock premises.
  2. Image result for pax on both houses carl sagan



Trump's Reply To Elizabeth Warren's Suggestion That We "Get Rid Of The Electoral College"

$
0
0
Viewing all 30150 articles
Browse latest View live